Home | Electronic Edition | Subscriptions | Archives | Calendar | Sitemap | Customer Service | Help Register | Login   
FrederickNewsPost.com
Frederick, Maryland

55ºF SUNNY | View 5 day forecast | Traffic Report
NewsOpinionSportsBusinessArt/LifeLocalClassifiedsSpecial SectionsWatchdogAround FredCoMarketplaceNewspaper In Education
   Fri, November 20, 2009     WEB ONLY: RSS | Email Alerts | Multimedia | Columns | Blogs | Forums | Wireless
Local News
Home > Local News
Consignment owners say new law puts burden on them
Originally published January 09, 2009


By Ike Wilson
News-Post Staff

Consignment owners say new law puts burden on them
Photo by Graham Cullen


Jennifer Knill looks through a rack of clothes at Lucy’s Consignments for Kids and Moms-to-Be in Mount Pleasant on Thursday. Knill, from Fairfield, Pa., drives to Lucy’s to sell and buy clothes for her children. She has already called to complain to her congressional representative about the new law that curbs the sale of used children’s clothing without lead testing.
After 10 years operating consignment shops, Ginny Baird was afraid her businesses would no longer exist after a new consumer protection law goes into effect Feb. 10.

If enforced as written, the new law would have far-reaching economic implications, putting consignment shops out of business and exacerbating a depressed economic climate, several business owners said Thursday.

The rash of recalls in 2007 due to inadequate product testing resulted in new legislation intended to enforce tougher testing requirements and lower acceptable limits of lead and phthalates.

The law will prohibit the sale of any used clothing or merchandise for children under 12 that has not been tested and labeled in accordance with new standards.

Baird said she initially dismissed the report as false. But since she realized the law was real, she vowed not to go down without a fight.

She and other consignment shop owners launched a letter-writing campaign to the federal Consumer Product Safety Commission and congressional leaders.

"The immediate implication of this bill is that all children's consignment shops would be shuttered immediately," said Baird, owner of two Lucy's Consignment shops, in Frederick and Mount Airy .

Jennifer Guenther, CEO of Enkore Kids LLC in Boonsboro, joined the fight to save thousands of American businesses.

"Both as a mom and a children's business owner, I applauded the bill when it passed as I understood it then," Guenther said.

The fierce response from consignment shop owners prompted a clarification on Thursday afternoon from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, which said in a press release that consignment shop owners do not have to pay for lead testing and are not required to certify that those products meet the new lead limits.

"The new law requires that domestic manufacturers and importers certify that children's products made after Feb. 10 meet all the new safety standards and the lead ban," the report stated.

"Sellers of used children's products, such as thrift stores and consignment stores, are not required to certify that those products meet the new lead limits, phthalates standard or new toy standards.

"The new safety law does not require resellers to test children's products in inventory for compliance with the lead limit before they are sold," according to the commission.

The CPSC also said that beginning Feb. 10, children's products cannot be sold if they contain more than 600 parts per million total lead. Certain children's products, manufactured on or after Feb. 10, cannot be sold if they contain more than 0.1 percent of certain specific phthalates or if they fail to meet new mandatory standards for toys.

"This is not an acceptable answer" from the CPSC, Guenther said. "Though it says resellers, etc., are not required to test, it also reiterates that resellers will have to adhere to the new standards. So unless I test, how will I know?"

The unfortunate side effect of the law as the Consumer Product Safety Commission intended to enforce it, Guenther said, is to put the burden of testing all children's products made before November 2008 on the current owner before they could be legally sold or donated -- even to foreign countries -- after Feb. 10.

Guenther said the law's sweeping testing requirements will also put out of business all children's handcrafters and small businesses that cannot afford testing. She said children's items -- clothing, books, blankets, strollers, toys, school supplies -- everything a child under 12 may use will be deemed hazardous, unless proven otherwise.

"This will cause financial hardship for families looking to buy secondhand items for their children or sell their children's outgrown items to make ends meet," Guenther said.

"We need to fix this law so it still protects the children, but 'grandfather' all legally produced goods made before November 2008, unless they are specifically recalled," she said.

Guenther said the CPSC still needs to address small "mom and pop" manufacturers such as those making children's hairbows and cloth diapers out of their homes.



Your comments Post your comments »

24 comments

January 09, 2009 @ 05:56 AM: lag8

Great.. clothes and other children's items that have been worn, used, or not - can't have a 2nd life and help those who depend on 2nd hand clothes, strollers, toys, etc... I have an attic full of gently used and never used summer clothing for babies and toddlers that was going to a consignment shop this spring - so what now, do I have to just throw this all away? Does the Frederick County Landfill have a way to deal with all of this? Can the recycling center deal with all the stollers, toys, high chairs, etc... that can't be donated or sold in a consignment shop? What is Goodwill going to do - and most important what are people going to do who can't afford to shop for their kids at a a regular store - they depend on Consignment shops and Goodwill. Somebody needs to look at this - I can understand not reselling clothes that have the painted characters on them and were made in another country, but cotton shirts and pants - come on.... FNP - you could have added the actual law as written in your article, or explained it better, or even better yet - provide a link for more information.

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 06:46 AM: lilbay

Man I pray they do something to appease these Soccer Moms i have never seen so many ranting on something in my life all over the net they are Peeved. Yet at the same time let one of their little ones take home one of the toys or outfits and get lead poisoning and they will be all over the place laying Blame. Just more proof no one is ever happy.

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 07:58 AM: srbmgr

Terrible law, not thought out. The law of "unintended consequences" says, no more yard sales for you! Unless...PUT UP A SIGN ON ALL OF YOUR CLOTHING AND BABY FURNITURE THAT CLEARLY STATES: "THIS MERCHANDISE IS FOR SALE TO KIDS OVER 13 YEARS OF AGE ONLY!"...That should get you out of your 5 year jail time penalty, and liability! --Steve Berryman.

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 08:05 AM: dr-wayne

If there is a danger in a product, then don't sell it. If that means you return those toys, clothing or whatever to those bring them in, then do it. If your only concern is taking a percentage of the sale for items sold and not in the safety of children then you don't belong in business. Consumer safety is paramount in any wholesale or retail business. Yes hard economic times are here and the need to save on clothing makes it attractive to shop at second hand stores, but as you wouldn't but ripped, torn or dirty items, do you really want unsafe items? find a way to work within the law protecting all of us and not how to ease the burden of responsible for you own wellbeing.

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 08:10 AM: dcg326

More controls,not needed just a job for the cpsc who couldn't run a garbage collection agency.

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 08:15 AM: poohkitty9

Once again.."Stupid Government Is, As Stupid Government Does"....

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 08:20 AM: enkorekids

Thanks, Ike, for covering this! In response to a request for the link itself to the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act - CPSIA - see: http://www.cpsc.gov/cpsia.pdf - I warn you though: the law is 62 pages long! You can also go to my blog: http://www.enkorekids.blogspot.com to find more relavant links and what you can actually do to help amend this poorly written law. In response to dr-wayne's comment: as a responsible business owner, I do check the CPSC's website to ensure the items we accept have not been recalled. The problem is, the CPSC will not be issuing a recall of these older products, So how are we just supposed to magically know if they have too much lead? And yet they still want to hold us responsible. This doesn't just affect businesses, it affects parents reselling stuff at their yard sale and on eBay, too!

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 08:20 AM: susan.e.bowman

lag8- I agree-these shops really can save a family that is broke and still wants to have pride in the way their kids look at school- Lucy's sells awesome clothes from high quality brand name places like Limited 2 and Aeropostale etc. I do agree we do not want the "lead clothes" but aren't these the same clothes that were bought new and some kid wore it a couple of time at best and it somehow all of a sudden, when we have dealt with 2d hand clothes and toys for like 100 years, it is not safe..it think it is getting a little too paranoid around here. It is funny because you can give the clothes to a friend and give their kid this supposed lead transfer but not a strangers kid? Plus what about people that donate and use as a much needed tax deduction? Will there be yard sale police? This sounds like a terrible idea-well intentioned maybe but it could hurt a lot of people in this ecomony.

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 08:21 AM: kirbydelauter

dcg & poohkitty - good points. But we keep elected the nit wits that create these laws. Actually, bureaucrats that sit around and think up this stupid crap, go to the nit wits we elect, then it becomes a law nobody ( but the bureaucrats ) want.

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 08:36 AM: millerjuliee1974

Actually, resellers can sell the clothing but it still has to be tested and can only contain a specific level. See the real information on the regulations at sys-con.com/node/803920. What's really even more unfortunate is how broad the law is written, and there is no intention for them to revisit. Even further, that there weren't controls in place a long time ago to measure the levels (or to just say the material cannot be used to fabricate any materials that go into clothing production).

REPORT TO MODERATOR

Frederick Weddings   

FNPWeddingPlanner.com

Start your wedding planning with our Frederick Maryland wedding planner for brides. Search for Frederick area wedding photographers, caterers, and reception halls. Find wedding tips, checklists, Frederick bridal events... all the resources you need to plan your wedding.


January 09, 2009 @ 08:51 AM: rstull49

OK what about garage sales? Is someone going to check all that stuff too?

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 09:06 AM: patmandan

Please remember that if you are unable to "sale" your items, they can still be "given" to someone. If you have not already done so check out "Freecycle" it's awesome! You can give your items to someone who in need of the item you have and you can find some really great stuff too. LOVE IT!!! and YES the county dump also has an area located in the "free" recycle area for clothes that are not in wearable condition. Please recycle...dont throw it away.

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 09:28 AM: susan.e.bowman

I would be interested to know the amount of deaths from lead in kids clothes. Does anyone have this? We have a great deal of resourceful posters here, maybe some one can locate this LOL

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 09:29 AM: mike.rowley

Is there not a list of products that have been deemed substandard or dangerous? If not, the CPSC needs to get busy and do they are being paid to do.

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 09:39 AM: enkorekids

I love freecycle. We use it alot both to get and to give. Unfortunately, in response to what patmandan said, it will not be allowed under the law to freecycle these potentially hazardous kids things, either. The law states it's forbidden to "manufacture, sell, or distribute". You can't even donate it to your favorite charity to be exported to the poor in Africa as its explicitly forbidden to export this stuff, too!

REPORT TO MODERATOR

Frederick Pets   

FNPpets.com

Sniff around, fluff your feathers... Search for Frederick area pet sitters, pet accessories, pet photographers, and Frederick vets. Find pet training tips, the latest Frederick pet news and gossip, Frederick pet events, and even make new friends.

All the treats you need to pamper your pet can be found right here on Frederick Maryland's Online Pet Playground.


January 09, 2009 @ 10:03 AM: lcjjsmsc

This law does not apply to consignment shops and resellers like ebay or garage sales. http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09086.html

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 10:09 AM: crisisofethics

No, the law applies. Specifically the news release says: "The new safety law does not require resellers to test children’s products in inventory for compliance with the lead limit before they are sold. However, resellers cannot sell children’s products that exceed the lead limit and therefore should avoid products that are likely to have lead content, unless they have testing or other information to indicate the products being sold have less than the new limit. Those resellers that do sell products in violation of the new limits could face civil and/or criminal penalties. " So, while it says they don't have to test, they cannot violate the limit, which means they won't know unless they test. With that kind of doublespeak, the CPC head must be shooting for a job in the new administration.

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 10:21 AM: crisisofethics

See, lcj, you fell into an Obama-like dodge of the question. You read "...is not required to certify" as "not covered." In fact, it says "they are covered". So, what they're saying is "you don't have to certify, if you're omniscient, and know that what you're selling is ok...however if you don't absolutely know, you either need to test or feel like a gambler, because if we catch you, we're hanging your sorry behind by the tallest branch we can find so you can be an example to those who believe sanity should be part of government."

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 10:36 AM: flynnd

Firefighters have a significantly higher rate of some cancers, such as testicular cancer, perhaps because of fire retardants used in their clothing. On the other hand, the CPSC requires all children's pajamas to be fire retardant. Sometimes I think we need a good civil war and a reboot.

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 10:36 AM: lcjjsmsc

LOL. I hope to NEVER fall for an Obama-dodge.... Anyway, I see it kind of like the mattress law - its illegal to see used mattresses but how many of those do you see on Craigs list or at Goodwill. Its one of those laws that no one enforces. I thought this was CPSC's way of covering their butts. They certainly can't say its ok to sell lead laden products, so they say sell anyway, but be aware that we can't actually condone it. I plan on continuing to buy and sell through ebay. I mean really - is the CPSC going to knock on my door because I just bought 5 pairs of jeans for my daughter (got name brand at a really good price BTW).

REPORT TO MODERATOR

  

New! FrederickHomefinder.com

Are you looking to relocate to the greater Frederick, Maryland area? Expand your search to include Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Virginia and all of Maryland. Research area communities and schools, find a real estate agent, and much more on Frederick HomeFinder. more »


January 09, 2009 @ 11:14 AM: susan.e.bowman

per lcjjsmsc... if it does not pertain to consignment shops why is this article saying it will? very strange. I hope Lucy's does not close!!!

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 11:15 AM: catcher

Wow. Two needless swipes at Obama concerning a story that has nothing to do with him or his policies. Thanks for the preview of what things are going to be like around here for the next eight years. Yes, I said eight. Enjoy yourselves.

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 01:15 PM: chmelik

Just another example of Big Brother sticking it's nose in, and now how many more people will they hire for inspectors because of this. It is time to take back our Government! The Bard had it right!

REPORT TO MODERATOR

January 09, 2009 @ 03:08 PM: tripttik

catcher, It will take eight years to actually get his "true" birth certificate.

REPORT TO MODERATOR

Story Tools
Top Headlines

Top Jobs View all »

Frederick Businesses


Advertisements










Home | Sitemap | Customer Service | Electronic Edition | Subscribe


Please send comments to webmaster or contact us at 301-662-1177.
351 Ballenger Center Drive • Frederick, MD 21703

Copyright 1997-09 Randall Family, LLC. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form.
The Frederick News-Post Privacy Policy. Use of this site indicates your agreement to our Terms of Service.