Efforts to address long-standing issues related to vacant and blighted city properties will pick up where they left off with the revival of an ad hoc committee.

Frederick Mayor Randy McClement said Wednesday that he will reconvene the Blighted and Vacant Ad Hoc Committee created more than three years ago. City residents, former committee members and elected officials have called for renewed efforts to address long-standing blight and vacancy issues.

The committee — nine voting members and four ex officio, or nonvoting, members — formed in 2012 to recommend ways to regulate and create programs to help the city handle blighted and vacant commercial and residential properties, The News-Post has reported.

The committee disbanded after submitting its two sets of recommendations, most recently in December 2012.

Public perceptions

Although the city implemented all of the committee's recommendations, some community members said efforts to combat blight have stalled.

"We're really looking for a higher degree of accountability from the city," said Darcy Richards, a coordinator for Neighborhood Advisory Council 11. "There's degrees of effectiveness."

Kathryn McKenzie, a member of the 2012 committee and a residential real estate broker, said some recommendations could have been better implemented.

Specifically, McKenzie pointed to the group's recommendations for creating incentive and assistance programs to give property owners the necessary financial support to bring properties up to code.

Others named properties plagued by habitual vacancies, but not necessarily blighted in terms of code violations, as an issue deserving more attention. Several mentioned the former Asiana building at 123-125 N. Market St. as an example. All violations on the property have been addressed, according to the city enforcement database, but the building remains vacant and without basic utilities required for occupancy.

"Buildings come off the watch list all the time because somebody painted or replaced the window, but you still have that vacancy," said resident Bruce Albaugh, also a NAC 11 coordinator. "The problem I see is that the city hasn't really looked at or taken a strong enough approach to habitual vacancy."

Ned Bond, a local resident and activist in community-driven efforts to combat blight, agreed in an interview Thursday. 

"It's like somebody took a bunch of rotten wood and put a coat of paint on it," he said.

Tamar Osterman, another member of the original ad hoc committee, suggested separating the issues of vacancy and blight. Osterman said vacancy should be addressed through an economic development lens, while blight could be reviewed by a committee specific to that topic.

Call for a new tool

Discussion of the problems and possible solutions with blight and vacancy issues stemmed from a new committee Alderman Josh Bokee proposed. Bokee on Wednesday outlined the details of his suggestion for a Blighted and Vacant Properties Review Board. 

Unlike the ad hoc committee, which was intended to dissolve after making recommendations, Bokee's proposal called for a long-term group tasked with reviewing and making recommendations on both vacant and blighted properties.

As proposed, the seven-member board would include two at-large city residents and one each from the following fields: residential real estate, commercial real estate, community development, banking and finance, and commercial law. The board would review the properties on the city's blighted property and property watch list at least quarterly. It would also submit an annual report examining the scope of blighted and vacant city properties through a more comprehensive lens.

Bokee described his proposal as an additional tool for the city to address a complex issue while involving the local community.

Other members of the Board of Aldermen, however, expressed concern with various aspects of this committee. Alderwoman Donna Kuzemchak said she didn't oppose the idea, but wanted to clarify that as a recommending body, the committee would be powerless to effect actual change.

As elected officials, Kuzemchak said, she and the other aldermen and mayor bore responsibility for making that change happen.

"Let's just pretend there's a property downtown we've had complaints on for 15 to 20 years," she said, referencing the Asiana building. "If we haven't done something to put legislation in place that helps with that issue ... that's on us. That's absolutely on us."

Alderwoman Kelly Russell cautioned that the proposed committee could be a slippery slope for what ad hoc committees can address for private property owners. She said she was concerned with the amount of city staff time and energy needed to assist the committee.

McClement echoed her concerns, pointing to city codes and state regulations on code enforcement and blight as the authority to inform city action on the problem, not a group of local residents.

Ad hoc group revisited

As the liaison alderman to the prior ad hoc committee, Alderman Michael O'Connor countered with a proposal of his own — bringing back the original ah hoc committee.

As the creators of the recommendations, O'Connor said, these members could best evaluate the city's effectiveness in translating recommendations into action. And though they met three years ago for a short-term review, they may want to reconvene and continue their work, O'Connor said.

"I think if they were all sitting here today, they might very well have said, 'You know what? We shouldn't disband this group. Somebody ought to hold the city's feet to the fire, and we're the people that should do that,'" O'Connor said.

McClement agreed with O'Connor's suggestion. He said he planned to contact former committee members to determine who were interested in continuing the work.

At least two former members, Osterman and McKenzie, said they were interested in serving on the reconvened committee.

After the meeting, McClement said he was open to tasking the commission with also examining and making recommendations on vacant, but not blighted, properties. However, he said that in the last 10 years of city work and various committees that looked at the issue, there has been no consensus.

"You'll always find every group has come up split," he said. 

Asked if previous stalemates were reason to give up, he added, "that doesn't mean you don't keep trying."

Richards declined to comment on the mayor's declaration to reconvene the committee, saying she wanted to wait until members began meeting again. 

"If the mayor were to have followed their suggestions to heart [in previous recommendations], I think we would have gone a long way," she said.

Bond was more skeptical.

"He [McClement] ignored everything the ad hoc committee did previously," Bond said. "He can do that again."

Follow Nancy Lavin on Twitter: @Nancy_Lavin228.

Nancy Lavin covers social services, demographics and religion for The Frederick News-Post.

(4) comments


City hall is back to the blighted properties again, this will keep them busy for awhile. Probably the golf course will come up next again. It will be business as usual, nothing will accomplished on any issue. The voters need a new mayor and BOA.




IF, after the last two decades, our elected governance continues to pass the buck to yet another UNKNOWN Committee membership, what's to be gained by another Committee that was disbanded 3 years ago? What is it about BLIGHT in Frederick, Maryland that has CHANGED over the last 3 years other than to go around the same CIRCLE and AGAIN arrive back at the same point we started from.

We played this same game with our ETHICS BOARD for years, who were PRESENT but never empowered to do anything more than pay lip-service to the subject of CORRUPTION, while riding out the same corruption that has existed in Frederick and the REGION and waiting for the public to go back to sleep.

This article is at best a teaser for things to come, while manipulating the current conversation on BLIGHT that has existed for decades and generations into another chapter of doing nothing.

This is a game strategy that has been played out for just as many decades anyone in this REGION can recall. We find a STALL STRATEGY, like the one being presented here and on faith alone believe our elected officials will EVENTUALLY run out of excuses and strategic manipulation of the public who are caused to witness 1st hand that nothing in Frederick, Maryland has really changed at all when it comes to BLIGHT.

Anyone ever play LIARS POKER? Isn't that what we are doing now and AGAIN with the FNP staging yet another bluff, that our elected officials are providing for THEIR partners, which doesn't included the public domain?


Y-A-W-N!!!!!! As a downtown property owner who has looked out from my living room window at not ONE but TWO properties that are falling apart and have been empty since I purchased my property in 1999, I have lost ALL confidence in our local government. This is just MORE talk and will continue to be so until these properties just continue to fall down and hopefully NOT hurt or kill someone in the process. If nothing has changed at next election, I will not vote for any incumbent that currently serves. This is ridiculous, embarrassing, and just sad. I'd like to be optimistic, but why should I be after 16 years with NO change to the properties I have watched day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year, and a decade plus. DO SOMETHING!!!!!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.