20 W. Fourth St.

20 W. Fourth St. is at the center of a decades-long legal battle.

The former owner of a condemned town house in downtown Frederick continues to challenge the city’s ownership of the property.

In the latest motion of a decades-long legal battle over the house at 20 W. Fourth St., former owner Allan Pickett asked the Maryland Court of Special Appeals to reconsider his ownership rights to the property. In its Oct. 6 opinion, the Court of Special Appeals upheld the March 2014 decision of then-Frederick County Circuit Judge Danny Brian O’Connor, letting the city foreclose on Pickett’s right to redeem property ownership.

Paul Jorgensen, the attorney representing Pickett before the Court of Special Appeals, filed a motion for reconsideration Thursday, the last possible day in the 30-day window after the court released its opinion. City of Frederick legal staff received the motion Monday, and provided The News-Post with a copy Tuesday.

As stated in the motion, Pickett has asked the court to reconsider the case based on O’Connor’s alleged conflict of interest.

In the original appeal, Pickett argued that O’Connor should have recused himself. O’Connor previously served as a court-appointed mediator between Pickett and the city in a separate condemnation case regarding the same property in 2005.

The Court of Special Appeals had dismissed this argument because Pickett had no evidence showing O’Connor had personal bias or prejudice against him. These are the grounds for a judge to disqualify himself or herself from a proceeding, according to the Maryland Code of Judicial Conduct.

The motion to reconsider, however, states that the Court of Special Appeals “misquoted and distorted the appropriate legal standards for recusal.” It also states that O’Connor “had a lengthy prior involvement with the parties as a mediator, and was exposed to their heated disputes, personalities and motives.”

The city cannot respond to the motion unless asked to by at least one of the three judges who concurred in the opinion, according to state code.

Because the city hadn’t been asked to file a response as of Tuesday morning, Assistant City Attorney Scott Waxter declined to comment except to say he saw no record or evidence that O’Connor participated in mediation to the extent the motion describes.

Jorgensen and O’Connor also declined to comment on the pending request for reconsideration.

The Court of Special Appeals hadn’t issued a mandate for its opinion, which would close the case and trigger a 30-day window for Pickett to appeal the decision to the Maryland Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court. The Court of Special Appeals must now decide to grant or deny the reconsideration request before it can issue that mandate, according to state code.

The motion comes on the heels of the Circuit Court opinion from a separate appeal Pickett filed to stop the city from tearing down the rear wing of the house. Frederick County Circuit Judge Theresa M. Adams last week upheld the city Historic Preservation Commission’s decision to allow demolition of the structurally unsound rear wing. Pickett may appeal or ask the court to reconsider its decision within 30 days of the Nov. 4 opinion.

The house was built in 1865, according to state property tax records. Pickett bought the property for $41,000 in 1982, and lived there for one week before renting it out, according to court records.

The city condemned the property in 1996 after Frederick police and officials found the building open and unsecured, filled with trash and feces. There was evidence of fires.

It then tried unsuccessfully to sell the property at a tax sale in 2004, but the prospective buyer backed out after several years of legal challenges from Pickett. After a second tax sale in 2011 yielded no offers, the city paid to have the tax certificate assigned to it.

Follow Nancy Lavin on Twitter: @Nancy_Lavin228.

Nancy Lavin covers social services, demographics and religion for The Frederick News-Post.

(2) comments

shiftless88

Some people! Is Pickett just ornery or actually crazy? How much has he spent in court, vs how much it would have cost him to fix the place. And people wonder why government costs so much.

pappyjoe

There has to be another story involving this property and it would be nice if the FNP found out what it is. Had the owner took the money he has spent on lawyers and invested into this property he could have made it a respectable place to live in or rent.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.