News that the latest design for the proposed downtown hotel and conference center definitely includes plans to demolish the historic Birely Tannery building attracted a small crowd Thursday to the city’s Historic Preservation Commission meeting.

The agenda for the meeting was rather light, with only one item set for hearing and no consent items or other business listed. That was why it was a little curious that between 10 and 15 people sat inside the City Hall boardroom that night, several of whom stood up during the beginning swearing-in ritual, thus signifying they planned to speak.

After roughly 15 minutes of taking care of regular business, it was time for the public comment period. It was then that eight of the audience members stepped up one by one to the microphone in the name of saving the Birely Tannery building.

The first was Anthony Moscato, chairman of the Frederick Preservation Trust, a local historic preservation advocacy group. Moscato read a prepared statement that summarized the historic significance of the building, which was built in 1909 and was the last operating tannery site in the city of Frederick, according to his research. He pointed out that the Maryland Historical Trust determined the building and site belong on the National Register of Historic Places, thus further proving its historic significance.

Moscato’s push to save the tannery is not a new one, as he has criticized city officials for failing to include anyone with an historic viewpoint on a hotel advisory team that was formed to research the project and other elements of the project as it has moved forward.

Other speakers who advocated for the tannery and Fredrick’s overall history Thursday included Peter Samuel, a local resident and longtime vocal opponent of the downtown hotel project; Richard Jeffries, a Frederick native who recently returned to the city and wants to see Frederick’s history restored; Sam Tressler IV, manager of Archai Media downtown; Vivian Campbell Combs, the owner of an historic home near the tannery site; Beth Anderson, a resident who expressed concerns about commercializing the downtown area; and Rebecca Trussell, a Montgomery College professor who passionately discussed the importance of preserving local history.

The message was clear from the speakers that they want the tannery to remain standing and question the construction of what they believe will be a commercialized hotel that will ruin the historic integrity of the site where it is proposed.

Developers Plamondon Hospitality Partners are planning to construct a four-story, 180-room hotel and 20,000 square-foot conference center at 200 and 212 E. Patrick St. The tannery building and an historic trolley building that once housed The Frederick News-Post are both part of the site. The latest design for the project proposes to demolish the dilapidated tannery building and repurpose the trolley building into a retail center, with plans to keep many of the historic elements.

The developers and architects are planning to submit a request to demolish the tannery building and plans to develop the hotel and conference to the Historic Preservation Commission in the near future. Historic Preservation Planner Lisa Mroszczyk Murphy said Thursday after the meeting that she had not yet received the paperwork.

The audience for the comments Thursday was also a little thin, as only four commissioners were in attendance. The commission is kind of small overall right now, though, with only six sitting members and two open spots.

The commissioners who attended Thursday’s meeting did not respond to the public comments, which is typical. Commission guidelines prevent commissioners from commenting on cases outside of the record.

Call for election judges

Registered voters who want to be part of the city election process from behind the scenes are encouraged to apply to become election judges.

According to a news release from Patti Mullins, the city’s public information coordinator, the city needs election judges for the upcoming primary and general elections and early voting periods. All registered voters can apply, and applications are due by 4 p.m., June 7.

The primary is set Sept. 12, and the general election is Nov. 7. Early voting is Aug. 25 and 26 and Oct. 27 and 28.

Judges must complete training and receive compensation for time spent training and for working during the elections. The election judge application is available online at http://www.cityoffrederick.com/documentcenter/view/8442.

Training will take place in early August, at a date and time to be announced. Further information is available from Phyllis Hane, legislative clerk, at 301-600-2575.

Follow Mallory Panuska on Twitter: @MalloryPanuska.

(6) comments

eswinnette

It is hypocritical at best, sadly scandalous and inappropriate how the taxpayer-enabled Frederick City Department of Economic Development has, while touting Downtown Frederick as a historic destination conspired deeply and uncompromisingly to destroy the last tannery building in the state of MD. This department continues to use its public office, the agencies of public communications including press releases to promote this largely for profit enterprise. And it does this with little regard for another Department of the City's, it's Planning Department's mandate for historic preservation.

Georgia

It's a historic, not "an" historic (viewpoint, whatever). So tiresome proofreading this thing every day . . . without compensation . . .

gary4books

With all due respect to our history, the tannery is unsightly and if not historical would be torn down. If one wants to restore history, I suggest the Mill on Mill Island (Worman's Mill) be a candidate. It has a place and grounds. The tannery is just a mess. The awnings are not to its periods, are other parts of its exterior.

joelp77440

Gary, the opposition is not really about the Tannery. Grew up around here and never knew what it was, just a old, falling down building. It's about the changing Frederick. I have heard a couple of rumors that if the Common Market tries to move into the old Carmack Jays place, there will be similar resistance. It's straight up NIMBY.

rbtdt5

I think the opposition is partly jealous of the parties involved, don't realize the benefits to the city/county and/or are just general complainer/protesters. Just my opinion

gary4books

[thumbup][thumbup]

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.