Downtown hotel and conference center

An architect’s rendering shows the basic look of Frederick’s proposed downtown hotel and conference center. The hotel and conference center buildings are on the right and building on the left is the former Frederick Railroad Terminal, which most recently housed The Frederick News-Post, and is set to become a retail area through renovation. Architects, designers and developers have worked closely with the city’s Historic Preservation Commission to come up with the initial design of the project.

After months of discussion and tweaking, developers and architects working on Frederick’s proposed downtown hotel and conference center cleared a “major hurdle” Thursday with the city’s Historic Preservation Commission.

“Tonight was a major hurdle that we passed after many, many workshops and a lot of good back-and-forth between the Historic Preservation Commission and the development team,” developer Pete Plamondon Jr. said after commissioners voted 5-1 to approve a Level 1 review of the multimillion-dollar project.

The Level 1 review includes details regarding the height, mass, scale and general layout of the four-story, 180-room hotel, 20,000-square-foot conference center, neighboring retail building and courtyard planned for 200-212 E. Patrick St., along Carroll Creek.

Richard Griffin, the city’s director of economic development, said the approved plans will now go to the city’s Planning Commission. The commissioners will review roads, utilities and other details to help develop a site plan. The plans will then go back to the Historic Preservation Commission for a Level 2 review, which Griffin said includes the finer elements of the design, such as materials, lighting, landscaping and other details.

The commissioners held four workshops since July with architects from Bates Architects and Peter Fillat Architects, and developers with Plamondon Hospitality Partners and gave feedback on various elements of the design and construction, according to the guidelines of the Frederick Town Historic District.

Running parallel to those efforts are meetings between the project partners, key stakeholders, members of local preservation and cultural groups, the state’s Department of Housing and Community Development, and the Maryland Historical Trust. So far one informational meeting was held in late October and was well-attended, according to officials who went. The meetings are required as part of the Maryland Historical Trust Act of 1985’s consultation process, which requires state agencies to consult with the trust on projects receiving assistance. The downtown hotel project is set to receive money from the department.

Several members of the public who spoke at Thursday’s meeting expressed concern that members of the trust and Department of Housing and Community Development have not weighed in on details of the project included in the Level 1 review.

Anthony Moscato, chairman of the Frederick Preservation Trust, a local preservation advocacy group, asked the commissioners to postpone their decision on the review until those officials have full discussions about various studies completed to determine the impact of the building and other mitigation details.

Commissioner Matt Bonin agreed that the trust’s feedback is important to the project and served as the lone opposition vote to the Level 1 approval as a result.

Other speakers from the public expressed concerns about the height and massing of the project. Frederick resident John Menke said the hotel as designed could block the view of the city’s clustered spires. Jane Weir, a longtime opponent of the project, expressed concern about the lack of a solid 3-D design for the project and worries about the hotel taking up the entire area and disrupting the streetscape.

Most of the commissioners said they understand those concerns but do not believe the size is a major issue.

“I’m generally in favor of this project. It’s a hotel, it’s not a house, it’s not a small shop,” Commissioner Stephen Parnes said of the size. “This is [a] major, major structure in our downtown.”

Commission Chairman Dan Lawton agreed with Parnes’ assessment and pointed out that the commission’s job is primarily to ensure the developers do not “plop down a suburban Marriott hotel” in the downtown historic district. He said the architects and developers have listened to the concerns of the commissioners in the many workshops they held, made modifications based on their feedback, and are expected to make more.

The project is set to come to fruition with both public and private dollars. The city, county and state are slated to contribute a total $31 million for infrastructure, parking land acquisition and site preparation, and the developers are set to pay the remaining construction and building costs.

The project has been in the works for years and made significant headway with the unveiling of the first design in the spring and a vote from the Historic Preservation Commission in September to allow demolition of the historic Birely Tannery building on the site. The vote gave the green light for the preferred design, which does not include the tannery.

Plans for preserving the elements of the site will come from the Maryland Historical Trust and Department of Housing and Community Development and will be incorporated into a memorandum of agreement with the city as part of the project plans.

Griffin said the organizations are set to host another meeting Tuesday similar to the one last month at which more mitigation details will be discussed. The invitation-only meetings are not open to the public.

Follow Mallory Panuska on Twitter: @MalloryPanuska.

(23) comments

elymus43

There are approx. 2100 motel/hotel rooms in the Frederick area. After the end of the next 4 years, Frederick will be a mess.

gary4books

The three factors are (1) location and (2) location and (3) location if one is downtown and wants to stay over after a meal or a tasting round or two.

jerseygrl42

Meetings taking place to grab $31 Million of taxpayer money that will be used to enrich two already rich families but meetings NOT open to the public....this bunch has reached new lows in the integrity department...would call it shameful but don't believe they have any

sevenstones1000

If you want to see a beautiful hotel, look at some of the grand hotels built at the turn of the last century. This flat roofed monstrosity looks like a Motel 6. You can just imagined the rumpled, half drawn plastic drapes we’ll all get to look at.

CDReid

A good example is the Summit Inn Resort, built in 1907 and between Farmington and Uniontown, Pa. http://summitinnresort.com/ I took my wife there Memorial Day weekend and she was in awe. They sure don't make 'em like that anymore.

rbtdt5

You could probably call/e-mail Richard Griffin to find out.

rbtdt5

Oops, this was a reply to your comment about how many stars this will get. Somehow I replied to the wrong post.

CDReid

You had me wondering......

Burgessdr

Those who spoke in opposition were clearly uninformed. They complained about details, but this was Level 1 CONCEPT approva. There is a long road ahead regarding details. One of the perennial uninformed and confused weirdly complained about the lack of a 3D model but also complained about the 3D model they had seen. Face palm.

sevenstones1000

That is one ugly building. It will join the new cancer center building at Rose Hill in the Hideous Frederick Architecture Hall of Fame.

gary4books

De gustibus non est disputandum.

jnorcross

And the FCPS Board of Education building.

rbtdt5

I think it looks good. Can't wait to see the finished product.

CDReid

I wonder what it's going to be rated down the road; 3 Star, 4 Star, 5 Star?

gary4books


gary4books
We will see how it works out. I do appreciate that every comment has been to promote a better Frederick. Honest people can disagree on the best way to fund the hotel.

DickD

Honest people wouldn't take our tax money to line the pockets of the Randalls and Plamodons, Gary. No problem if they use their money, but this was done in an underhanded way, even at the State level and you know that.

rbtdt5

You know that no tax money is going toward the hotel, right?

gary4books

[sad]

CDReid

A lime green "Yield to pedestrians in crosswalk" sign is missing from the cross walk.

threecents

31 Million in tax dollars. Hopefully it is a good investment, and we will learn to love it.

public-redux

I hope they insist on lots of trash containers. Littering tourists is one of KellyAlzan's biggest worries.

KellyAlzan

FOOLS

Crusty Frederick Man 64

Kelly let’s not forget, BUREAUCRATS, CLOWNS, and OBLIVIOUS.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.