BG Midair crash file 5

An investigator photographs debris from the downed Robinson R-44 at the Frederick Self Storage facility on Monroe Avenue the day after the 2014 crash. Most of the wreckage came to rest between two buildings on the site.

An air traffic control contractor is challenging the claim that pilots involved in a deadly midair crash over Frederick couldn’t have seen each other.

In the ongoing wrongful-death trial against Midwest Air Traffic Control Services, attorney William Conroy called flight experts to the stand on Wednesday. They had created a simulation that purported to show the plane was in the helicopter’s field of view with enough time to avoid the air disaster.

Robert Winn, of the engineering and scientific investigation firm Engineering System Inc., said he used data from the National Transportation Safety Board, the plane’s computer, radar data, radio communications and an inspection of the wreckage to reconstruct the crash.

Ultimately, Winn used a virtual reality system programmed to represent the events that led to the crash. A pilot, Gerry Ventrella, then used the simulator to determine whether an experienced helicopter pilot could have avoided the crash.

A plane was visible in the simulation shown in court Wednesday.

An attorney for the crash victims’ families questioned the methodology behind the simulation. Bruce Lampert asked if a pilot in the real world would need to be scanning his instruments and suggested there was no way to tell where the pilot was looking at any given time.

“I was depicting what was there to be seen,” Winn responded.

Christopher Parsons, 29, of Westminster, and William Jenkins, 47, of Morrison, Colorado, were killed on Oct. 23, 2014, when a Cirrus plane and their helicopter crashed. Parsons was an instructor. Jenkins, a licensed pilot, was training on the helicopter to rent it.

Families of the men are now involved in a wrongful-death suit against Midwest Air Traffic Control Services, the contractor staffing the control tower at the airport.

Breandan MacFawn, 35, of Cumberland, a passenger on the helicopter, also died in the crash, but his family is not part of the suit.

One key piece of the families’ case is that Parsons and Jenkins could not have seen the plane and that it was the duty of the air traffic controller to keep the aircraft a safe distance apart.

Aviation experts hired by the plaintiffs created flight simulations showing it was impossible for the men flying the helicopter to see the plane.

Robert Michael, another attorney for the families of the men who died, asked Ventrella if he did the simulation alone. When Jenkins was piloting the helicopter, Parsons was seated next to him, so Michael asked if that could have affected Jenkins’ field of vision.

Ventrella said he did the simulation alone, but having two people should have made the situation safer because more eyes would have been on the sky.

Ventrella, who was testifying for the first time as an expert witness, said that after he reviewed information related to the crash, he believed Jenkins and Parsons could have avoided the crash.

“I would not say they were scanning properly, or they would have seen the airplane,” he said.

He said that about two minutes before the crash, the air traffic controller mentioned over the radio that helicopters were in the traffic pattern of the airport and a plane was coming in from the west. The pilots should have used that information to stay vigilant and avoid other aircraft, he said.

The trial is expected to continue through the week.

Follow Kelsi Loos on Twitter: @KelsiLoos.

(2) comments

DickD

There is an article in News magazine, March 2017, where two men, Romero and Lamm, developed a warring system for Idaho, to warn drivers about deer, elk, etc. on the roads. The old system Idaho had just notified drivers there was something on the highway and drivers ignored the warnings. There were too many false warnings - leaves, branches, etc. on the road. The two men developed a new system with algorithms that identified the object as being animal or not. After it was installed, accidents due to animals on the road went to zero.

The two men now have a company, Skynet, which is developing warnings for aircraft, due to drones becoming a problem. Seems like this would work just as good at an airport to warn planes and helicopters of the prescience of each. The fear is drones could be used by terrorists.


https://www.wired.com/2017/02/sky-net-illegal-drone-plan/

After reading the article, I tried to fond the company on the Internet. There are some other references to Skynet, but none seem to be this company. (Looks like they have a new company name, Black Sage.

Here is their web site for anyone wanting to contact them.
https://www.blacksagetech.com/contact/

Another we've site explaining how tit can be used against terrorists.
http://topratedquadcopters.com/this-brilliant-plan-could-stop-drone-terrorism-too-bad-its-illegal/

Observer10

Every accident seems to be seen as an opportunity to reap financial rewards by filing suit and claiming damages. This soils the memory of the deceased as their memory becomes an opportunity for a money grab. Even the parents of the poor children of Sandy Hook Elementary saw their passing as an opportunity to become a little richer. Shameful.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.