Microbiologist and anthrax terror suspect Bruce Edward Ivins is still receiving patents for his scientific work nearly five years after his death.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services received a patent for a method to treat or prevent infection caused by a bioterrorism agent to a group of people that included Ivins on July 9.

Monday marks the five-year anniversary of the scientist's death. Ivins died July 29, 2008, at Frederick Memorial Hospital, two days after his wife, Diane, found him unconscious on the bathroom floor of the family's home across the street from Fort Detrick, where he worked for more than 25 years as a scientist at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. He died of an overdose of acetaminophen.

Diane Ivins declined to be interviewed for this story. She has never spoken publicly about the case.

In the days after his death, the Federal Bureau of Investigation named Ivins the person responsible for the 2001 anthrax attacks that claimed five lives and sickened 17 others. Five years later, questions remain about whether the man who volunteered for the American Red Cross was capable of such carnage.

Ivins' death came as the federal government prepared to name him as its suspect in the anthrax case; a curious twist for a man who had devoted much of his career to researching anthrax, and who himself had assisted the bureau in the initial days after letters filled with spores arrived at media outlets and the offices of Democratic Sens. Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy.

The appearance of the letters in the weeks after the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, served to worsen the unease many Americans were already feeling in the aftermath. The case would become one of the longest and most expensive in the FBI's history, going so far as to lead to the draining of a Frederick pond as the bureau sought clues about a possible underground lab.

Jeffrey Adamovicz worked at USAMRIID for 12 years and supervised Ivins from 2003 through 2004. Ivins was a man with nervous energy, a thorough researcher known for quirky poems, Adamovicz said.

“Memories are selective, I suppose, but I remember mainly good things,” said Adamovicz, now at the University of Wyoming.

Initially, U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft named former USAMRIID scientist Steven Hatfill a “person of interest” in 2002. When the case against Hatfill unraveled, the FBI found Ivins an easy scapegoat, Adamovicz said. He said the bureau focused on circumstantial evidence that included personal details about the scientist's peculiarities and fixations.

Ivins' only guilt was “being one custodian of this flask,” Adamovicz said, referring to USAMRIID's RMR-1049 labeled flask that the FBI said contained the source material. Over the years, dozens of other researchers had access to the flask and spores from it had been shared with other labs, he said.

“This is politics at its most disgusting,” Adamovicz said.

Lawmakers' intrusion in the labs and layers of bureaucratic red tape intended to increase safety and security in the aftermath of the attacks made the working environment at the Fort Detrick lab unpalatable for Adamovicz. He left USAMRIID in late 2007.

USAMRIID added biosurety and security measures in the aftermath of the 2001 anthrax mailings, but those changes were made for a variety of reasons, including the need to focus on national security and are not a direct result of the Amerithrax case alone, officials have said.

“USAMRIID personnel participated fully on the Amerithrax investigation but the Institute has no comment on the outcome or conclusion of the investigatory authorities,” spokeswoman Caree Vander Linden said. “While questions may remain, USAMRIID must continue to focus on its research mission and leave the speculation to others.”

Priscilla Wyrick hired Ivins as a postgraduate researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the 1970s. While there, Ivins exhibited an obsession about the Kappa Kappa Gamma sorority, Wyrick said. Other than telling him to knock it off, she found no red flags about what was to come years later, she said.

“The Bruce I knew at that time was sort of goody two-shoes,” Wyrick said.

Wyrick, who lives in North Carolina, struggles with the question of whether the bright, eager man who trained under her could have been responsible. In the months after the attacks, Ivins came to East Tennessee State University, where Wyrick was working at the time, to give a talk about anthrax. Ivins told her not to ask any questions about the investigation, but that was standard, Wyrick said

During his time at UNC that Ivins began to bother Nancy Haigwood, a member of Kappa Kappa Gamma. Haigwood would eventually come forward in response to an appeal for help by investigators to the American Society for Microbiology in December 2001. Haigwood said an email that Ivins sent to colleagues with a picture of himself handling anthrax without gloves was unusual and “very odd behavior for a scientist.” Ivins' unusual behavior and his email led her to believe he “might” be responsible, she said.

Haigwood, an adjunct professor at Oregon Health and Science University, said she “always hoped he was not responsible, but I was worried that he was.”

“I am sorry that we could not get better closure on the case before Bruce took his life,” she said.

As investigators dug deeper, the FBI focused its investigation on those with access to the RMR-1029.

A 92-page summary of the Amerithrax investigation issued by the Justice Department in 2010 noted Ivins' habit of working late into the night and at odd hours around the time of the attacks as well as some unexplained time away from the lab. The summary gave Ivins' professional disappointments as motive — an anthrax vaccine program he'd worked on was in jeopardy — and also referenced his obsession with Kappa Kappa Gamma. The mailbox from which the anthrax letters were sent in Princeton, N.J., was close to a Kappa Kappa Gamma location.

“A GPS device was installed on his car, interviews with his associates were conducted, his trash was regularly searched, and confidential sources were used to gather further information,” the Justice Department report said.

That FBI's evidence is not enough for Henry Heine, now at the University of Florida or Gerard Andrews, now of the University of Wyoming. Heine worked at USAMRIID until 2010 and was one of Ivins' friends. Andrews served as chief of USAMRIID's bacteriology division from 2000 until 2003.

It wasn't uncommon for researchers working on time-sensitive experiments to keep odd hours.

“He had absolute justification and cause to go into that suite at night,” Andrews said. “Biological systems don't work according to your schedule.”

“This whole thing has been insulting and offensive and scandalous as far as I'm concerned,” Andrews said.

As the FBI's investigation dragged on, investigators played USAMRIID employees off each other. Heine said someone had searched his cabin in West Virginia as well as his truck one night as he slept. He knew it was investigators because "everything was nice and neatly laid out on the seat, like nice and even,” Heine said.

As pressure mounted, Heine said Ivins tried accusing him of being the attacker.

“He was being told that everybody was pointing fingers at him,” Heine said.

Ivins' work emails show his increasingly desperate mental state, his penchant for joking with colleagues and also revealed some of the stresses of the FBI investigation. In one email, sent July 8, 2008, to an undisclosed recipient, Ivins asks the recipient to help get his inventory straightened out “all because on Nov 1, 2007, the FBI came in and seized lots of material from my locked refrigerator in my locked room in our locked containment suite.”

Around this same time, Ivins was receiving updates about the need to report for routine safety training. Ivins made several references to no longer being allowed to work in labs and also indicated that he planned to retire as early as Sept. 2, 2008.

“I don't think I'm even allowed escorted access into the laboratory areas. But I can remember them still...palm trees, sand, the sea rushing up to kiss the shore, soft music playing as the sun goes down...ah, yes, those were the days of (redacted) and (redacted),” he wrote in one email dated July 8, 2008.

The following day, July 9, 2008, Ivins attended a group therapy session during which his counselor, Jean Duley, said he made homicidal threats and referenced charges pending against him. Police picked up Ivins the next day, and he was hospitalized until July 24, 2008. On that day, Frederick County District Court Judge W. Milnor Roberts issued a peace order barring Ivins from contacting or going near Duley. A hearing was set for July 31, 2008.

“It comes down to it has nothing to do with whether he was guilty or innocent,” Heine said. “It comes down to his personality, and how he dealt with the pressure.”

Rachel Lieber, the Justice Department's lead attorney in the Ivins case, was not able to comment for this story. She told Frontline in 2011 that the “confluence of all these things taken together, that's the compelling evidence.”

“It's only when you take a step back and you look at all the evidence taken together can you realize this is the right person,” Lieber said.

Follow Courtney Mabeus on Twitter: @courtmabeus.

(26) comments


Perhaps next week we can beat some other dead horses like the Kennedy assassination controversy or the whereabout of Jimmy Hoffa. Slow month for news.


FNP redid the Jimmy Hoffa story this year.
See http://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/crime_and_justice/crime/article_ 9815366d-56b9-5447-9a1f-e3bea7f231f0.html

There was a letter referencing Kennedy.

Pitch us an idea or send us your opinion
News tips and coverage requests: citydesk@newspost.com, 301.662.1178
Letters to the Editor: letters@newspost.com
Citizen's Blogs: webmaster@newspost.com

See http://www.fredericknewspost.com/site/contact.html


Gotta love all the "experts" on here,lol.Ivins was a SCAPEGOAT.Wake up people.


So you think the normal way the FBI investigates crime is to wait until they've settled a law suit with someone they've publically targeted then target someone else who is more isolated so they don't have friends to support them?


He only "became" the right suspect because of his mental deterioration from the psychological warfare the FBI was using on him which furnished the increasing odd behavior he displayed. The FBI and other law enforcement agencies often use this "creative" law enforcement procedure to manufacture what they can't find in an on-going investigation.


Thank you J. Edgar Hoover[wink]


Yet, the FBI never could prove that Ivins manufactured the dry powder from the type of wet anthrax suspensions used at Fort Detrick. It couldn’t prove that he scrawled letters mimicking the hateful rhetoric of Islamic terrorists. And it couldn’t prove that he twice slipped away to Princeton to mail the letters to news media outlets and two U.S. senators; it could prove only that he had an opportunity to do so undetected.

The $100 million investigation did establish that circumstantial evidence could mislead even investigators armed with unlimited resources.

See http://www.propublica.org/article/new-evidence-disputes-case-against-bruce-e-ivins


Coincidently the Justice Department announced the law suit with Hatfill was settled June 27, 2008?

The settlement, consisting of $2.825 million in cash and an annuity paying Dr. Hatfill $150,000 a year for 20 years, brings to an end a five-year legal battle that had recently threatened a reporter with large fines for declining to name sources she said she did not recall.

See http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/28/washington/28hatfill.html?_r=0


Watson, No, those who work on anthrax have been vaccinated.


You of course are wrong. Anthrax spores have to enter the body through an opening in the skin or by eating it. To be a bioweapon they have to be weaponized into a powder that could be inhaled. Not something just anyone could do. Mixing anthrax spores with baby powder doesn't make a weapon.

The discovery about anthrax could be used to fight cancer because the same pathway that is turned off by LF is permanently turned on in some cancer cells, causing uncontrolled cell growth. If scientists could find a way to selectively turn off the process, it could be a way to stop cancer growth, Vande Woude said.

See http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9804/30/anthrax.antidote/


Watson, I am not wrong; All people who work with anthrax have been vaccinated. The vaccine is called AVA, and Dr. Ivins helped to develop it.


Watson, you are wrong, ANYONE who works with or works IN a suite that is being utilized for Anthrax experiments(and a very long list of other agents) are FULLY VACCINATED BEFORE they are allowed to enter said suite(s).A series of shots are given over a period of time against Anthrax and many other bio agents.


To get sick, people would have to have contact with the spores in one of three very specific ways: they would have to breathe thousands of these spores all the way into their lungs; they would have to eat meat that had spores in it (meat that spreads anthrax comes from animals that were infected with the bacteria and usually is not cooked fully); or they would have to handle something with spores on it and get spores in cuts on their skin.

See http://kidshealth.org/kid/health_problems/infection/anthrax.html


Rscott, No evidense that Ivins went to NJ. WmPratt, He was probably holding a petrI dish containing colonies of anthrax bacteria.


Whatever the form it was a photograph. Reasonable doubt is all over it.


Purpose the threat has been eliminated but it is too secret to be publicised.

A post World War II investigation revealed that the Japanese researched numerous organisms and used prisoners of war as research subjects. Slightly less than 1,000 human autopsies apparently were carried out at Unit 731, mostly on victims exposed to aerosolized anthrax. Many more prisoners and Chinese nationals may have died in this facility - some have estimated up to 3,000 human deaths. Following reported overflights by Japanese planes suspected of dropping plague-infected fleas, a plague epidemic ensued in China and Manchuria. By 1945, the Japanese program had stockpiled 400 kilograms of anthrax to be used in a specially designed fragmentation bomb.

In 1943, the United States began research into the use of biological agents for offensive purposes. This work was started, interestingly enough, in response to a perceived German biological warfare (BW) threat as opposed to a Japanese one. The United States conducted this research at Camp Detrick (now Fort Detrick), which was a small National Guard airfield prior to that time, and produced agents at other sites until 1969, when President Nixon stopped all offensive biological and toxin weapon research and production by executive order. Between May 1971 and May 1972, all stockpiles of biological agents and munitions from the now defunct U.S. program were destroyed in the presence of monitors representing the United States Department of Agriculture, the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, and the states of Arkansas, Colorado, and Maryland. Included among the destroyed agents were Bacillus anthracis, botulinum toxin, Francisella tularensis, Coxiella burnetii, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, Brucella suis, and Staphylococcal enterotoxin B. The United States began a medical defensive program in 1953 that continues today at USAMRIID.

See http://www.iaff.org/hs/resi/anthrax/BioWarfare.htm


Who would doubt the government would make someone a scapegoat? As I recall Ivins was tweaking the vaccine. Because the real project is a real secret we won't ever know who really did it.

Source: Washington Post, December 13, 2001.

Army Working on Weapons-Grade Anthrax

Utah Facility Quietly Developed Formulation; Spores Sent Back and Forth to Md.

By Rick Weiss and Joby Warrick, Washington Post Staff Writers

An Army biological and chemical warfare facility in Utah has been quietly developing a virulent, weapons-grade formulation of anthrax spores since at least 1992, and samples of the bacteria were shipped back and forth between that facility and Fort Detrick, Md., on several occasions in the past several years, according to government officials and shipping records.

See http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/armyweaponsgradeanthrax.html


Another dead horse to beat today !!


Bring back stories, why its over .No court,no guilt.


Antrax is a spore. weaponized it is a powder, that you can see. You can also attach tracer elements to spores to see them. Have you ever seen pollen? I have. Wow, imagine that.

That said, though I do believe Ivins was probably the guy, the FBI botched the investigation. They broke the man into suicide. The most incriminating evidence against him were his trips to NJ days before the letters were opened. Something not focused on in this article.


No not that said. You can obtain from a photograph what a power is? I know how the FBI operates, from this case to others. All they want is a conviction (or at least the ability to assign guilt). Find the real perp doesn't seem to be their MO.


Antrax is a spore. weaponized it is a powder, that you can see. You can also attach tracer elements to spores to see them. Have you ever seen pollen? I have. Wow, imagine that.

That said, though I do believe Ivins was probably the guy, the FBI botched the investigation. They broke the man into suicide. The most incriminating evidence against him were his trips to NJ days before the letters were opened. Something not focused on in this article.


"Haigwood said an email that Ivins sent to colleagues with a picture of himself handling anthrax without gloves was unusual and “very odd behavior for a scientist.” Ivins' unusual behavior and his email led her to believe he “might” be responsible, she said."

So what did the Anthrax look like?

I hope some of you get my point but for those of you who don't. You can't see Anthrax in a picture of a person. Maybe Ivins was joking about it really being Anthrax? Did they even ask him?


It would be safe to handle anthrax without gloves unless you had a cut which would allow it to enter the body. Perhaps he was just trying to illustrate that it was ridiculous to fear anthrax because he didn't know it was being weaponized.


First off I'd like to commend the FNP for the headline. A Suspect is all that Ivins will ever be. No trial ever took place. As it is the FBI closed the case and the guilty party could still be out there. Keep in mind they never had enough evidence to even make an arrest. For years they were convinced that Hatfield was guilty. Sadly Ivins wasn't strong enough to stare down the FBI like Hatfield was.


Hatfill ...had a band of brothers and a they never left my side. Um, I still work with them to this day. Patriots, soldiers, highly decorated men and that gives you the strength just to be in their company.

See http://www.today.com/id/36565308/ns/today-today_news/t/exonerated-anthrax-suspect-fbi-harassed-me/

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Already a member?

Login Now
Click Here!

Currently a News-Post subscriber?

Activate your membership at no additional charge.
Click Here!

Need more information?

Learn about the benefits of membership.
Click Here!

Ready to join?

Choose the membership plan that fits your needs.
Click Here!