State transportation bank bill comes before legislators

Galen Clagett

ANNAPOLIS — A local delegate's plan to lower corporate taxes and open a bank to fund local transportation projects came before state lawmakers Thursday.

Delegate Galen Clagett testified that 33 states already have infrastructure banks, and Maryland should get on board to keep up with needed capital improvements.

"If we don't think out of the box, we're going to continue to do business the way we're doing business. We're way behind other states as far as this is concerned," Clagett, D-District 3A, told lawmakers in the House Ways and Means Committee on Thursday.

His bill would establish an infrastructure bank filled with funds from corporate income tax revenue, any other state appropriations and investment earnings. Local governments or private entities could then apply for loans from the bank to finance transportation projects, according to Clagett.

During the hearing, Delegate Andrew Serafini questioned Clagett about what would happen if borrowers don't repay the bank.

Clagett said the state is not obligated to bail out the fund if it runs into financial difficulty.

"The bank stands or falls on its own," said Serafini, R-Washington.

"Absolutely," Clagett said.

The board in charge of overseeing the bank would include state business and transportation officials, a member from the Maryland Association of Counties and two private industry representatives appointed by the governor, according to the bill. The board would develop a system for deciding which projects should receive loans from the bank.

Clagett's bill would also decrease the corporate income tax rate from 8.25 percent to 7.25 percent for businesses that form or locate in Maryland starting this year. In five years, the rate would sink to 7.25 percent for all businesses, according to the proposal.

In addition, about 12 percent of corporate income tax revenue would start flowing toward the infrastructure bank starting in fiscal 2015.

Because of the tax cut and new revenue distribution, the state's general fund would lose out on an estimated $96 million in fiscal 2015 and $150.6 million in fiscal 2019, according to a legislative analysis.

Clagett's proposal picked up support from the city of Baltimore, which submitted written testimony to the Ways and Means Committee.

"Continuing to divert local dollars to transportation projects is not a sustainable model," wrote Andrew Smullian, deputy chief of legislative and government affairs for the Baltimore mayor's office of government relations. "We need to support and enrich our transportation partnership with the state to move our visitors, businesses and citizens safely along Maryland's roadways."

The infrastructure bill is part of a group of economy-related proposals Clagett has put forward this session.

Clagett last week presented a proposal to create a state business ombudsman who would work for the Maryland governor. The ombudsman would be tasked with helping businesses interact with the state, sort through any permit holdups and fast-track projects.

State analysts estimated that creating the new office would cost more than $124,000, enough to pay salaries of an ombudsman and an administrative assistant.

Follow Bethany Rodgers on Twitter: @BethRodgersFNP.

(6) comments


There is a catch somewhere????


" 8.25 percent to 7.25 percent for businesses that form or locate in Maryland starting this year. In five years, the rate would sink to 7.25 percent for all business" so if I have a business here, my competition can move here and get a better rate. If I survive for another 5 years I get the same deal? Yea, what a deal let me quick get behind that idea.


Does Mr. Clagett know what a bank is or how they operate? Banks collect money from investors and lend it out to borrowers with an expectation of its being repaid with interest. Interest means profit. Or is profit a bad word to the socialists running the State of Maryland?


You can bet this will benefit Clagget more then anybody


Why can't the people of this state get their taxes lowered. With the corporate tax rate at 8.25% they already have a lower tax rate then I do and I am by no means a wealthy person. I am a middle class citizen who has not received a raise in several years, but my taxes have increased, health insurance has increased and cost of living has increased. When do we get a break!


"Mirror View" or Cynic Stupid are the negative responses to this article.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Already a member?

Login Now
Click Here!

Currently a News-Post subscriber?

Activate your membership at no additional charge.
Click Here!

Need more information?

Learn about the benefits of membership.
Click Here!

Ready to join?

Choose the membership plan that fits your needs.
Click Here!