Roughly two dozen members of the Frederick County Agricultural Society filled Frederick City Hall on Thursday during the city’s Historic Preservation Commission meeting.
They waited patiently through the first two and a half hours of discussion and decisions before time came for the last item on the meeting agenda. Then, fireworks erupted.
At issue was a recommendation to place a historic preservation overlay on part of the Frederick Fairgrounds property at 797 E. Patrick St.
An overlay is an extra layer of regulations on top of zoning requirements already in place. If approved, the designation would give the Historic Preservation Commission authority to review and approve major exterior changes to the properties.
Although the designation is intended to protect the city’s historic buildings and sites, Anne Rollins, an attorney with Miles & Stockbridge, the firm representing the agricultural society, which owns the fairgrounds, framed the application a bit differently.
The designation would have a “serious and negative impact” on the use and function of the fairgrounds, she said in the Thursday hearing. She added that the application, submitted not by the property owner but by the historic preservation commission itself, was “tantamount to the unconstitutional taking of our property without just compensation.”
Rollins also contested the historic value of the sites and structures proposed for the overlay.
The 135-year-old site provides information and context for the agricultural industry in Frederick, and the region as a whole, according to the commission staff report submitted by Lisa Mroszczyk Murphy. The proposed overlay boundary includes 21 buildings and structures, including the racetrack and tunnel beneath it, the grandstand, the show ring and the farmers market building.
But Rollins said all of those buildings have been renovated, and are no longer in their original condition. The grandstand underwent renovations in the 1960s, 1980s and again recently to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act requirements. The racetrack gets resurfaced at least twice per year, and the farmers market has undergone modifications as well.
Many of the structures also use vinyl, which, as Rollins noted, is not allowed under the guidelines for the Frederick Town Historic District.
Despite her comments, the commission voted 5-2 to recommend the overlay. The approval was not without heated debate among commission members, though.
Dan Lawton, who voted against the overlay, said he found the property owner’s arguments compelling.
“I wish this property owner wanted that extra layer of protection, but that’s just a wish, and that’s not reality,” he said. “The reality is, if [the fairgrounds] economically fail, if this group of people doesn’t keep it as a fairground, who’s going to make it a fairground?” he asked.
Stephen Parnes, who also opposed the overlay, pointed to the larger problems with the process of picking properties to designate.
Unlike downtown property owners, who realize the impact the Frederick Town Historic District will have when they buy real estate, these property owners had no forewarning, Parnes said.
“I knew what I was buying into when I moved downtown,” he said. “I don’t think Frederick Fairgrounds and its board bought into what we’re trying to recommend.”
But Scott Winnette, commission chairman, questioned by Parnes was objecting to the process now. The commission previously recommended five other sites for designation, some of which were met with protest from the owners of those properties.
For Winnette, it was a question of integrity, and of historic preservation. And those won out over property owners’ concerns.
The commission also voted on Thursday to recommend an overlay at Schifferstadt Architectural Museum at 1110 Rosemont Ave. and the Monocacy Brewing Co. property — locally known as the Ebert’s Dairy building — at 1781 N. Market St.
All three recommendations will be reviewed by the Planning Commission before going to the mayor and Board of Aldermen. The aldermen have final authority to approve or deny the designations, regardless of what the commissions recommend.
Roughly two dozen sites were identified in the city’s 2010 Comprehensive Plan as potentially eligible for similar designations. A designation committee will continue to make recommendations for or against historic designations on the remaining properties.
Follow Nancy Lavin on Twitter: @NancyKLavin.
Time for the HPC to be dissolved, and the regulations rescinded.
What the Fairgrounds needs is not the Hysterical Committee. And just how are they going to enforce something that was never asked for? If this goes through, there will be a court case, for sure. Tell them to get lost!
This is all about the downtown elite wanting control due their overall vision of the city. Future development along the great canal will eventually extend next to and close to the fair grounds and city government want to insure the have control of the surrounding area.
Guys. This reminds me of the times neighbors have suddenly decided they are interested in other homes' landscaping and maintenance and esthetic choices and try to engage people in their quest. We have no HOA and that's the appeal for many. My response is always the same: move. If you have so little to concern yourself with that you've decided to oversee other properties, move where you'll be busier because you're just annoying people here whose crime is, they lack your taste. Concentrate on the bit that is yours. No one expects more. You shouldn't either.
Again this shows the stupidity of the Hysterical Commission of the city. They are going to chase home and business owners out of the city, and then you will end up having more blighted properties. Mayor Bagel and the alderman need to fix this, but they can't fix their own mistakes.
this is stupid. Why is the city even expanding the overlay of the historic district. Oh, for more money, that's why. I so can't wait to move out of this heck hole of a town who is so greedy for money, they'll do anything.
Welcome to the discussion.
Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.