ANNAPOLIS — Frederick County lawmakers agreed on Friday to uncap local beer producers.

A bill this session with the county delegation’s support will carve out an exception for small breweries in Frederick County by raising the cap on the number of barrels of beer they can produce. The breweries will also be able to sell up to 4,000 barrels of beer at a second location and double their distribution limit.

“I don’t have any objection to the second location. I’m sure there’s going to be objection from others on the limits on self-distribution,” said Sen. Ron Young (D-District 3) at the delegation’s meeting on Friday.

Nick Manis, a lobbyist working on behalf of the Maryland Beer Wholesalers Association, objected for the third straight week to the proposal. Small breweries would be able to market and sell up to 6,000 barrels of their own beer — instead of the current 3,000 barrels — if the bill passed. This would undercut business for existing wholesale companies, he said.

“This has statewide ramifications, because it’s very difficult to do something in one county and not in the rest of the state, especially when it’s an issue like this,” Manis told the delegation.

Frederick County is home to the most breweries in all of Maryland, but only two breweries — and three more being licensed — that may be able to increase production if the cap changed, said Kevin Atticks, a lobbyist on behalf of the Brewers Association of Maryland. The county is also home to an additional four farm breweries, which could increase distribution, if the second half of the bill passes.

One of those farm breweries is Milkhouse Brewery near Mount Airy owned by Tom Barse.

Barse grows his own hops to produce a modest 500 barrels a year, which is well under the 15,000-barrel cap for his licenses. But he also invests approximately $100,000 a year to purchase Maryland-grown grains and agricultural products for his beer. Increasing the distribution caps would help him expand, he said.

“It gives you an opportunity to plan on how to grow your business. That’s why these limits have always been wrong, because it limits how you plan to grow your business,” said Barse, who also serves on the government affairs committee of the Brewers Association of Maryland.

It’s not just Frederick County that is considering raising its production and distribution caps, however. Montgomery County is considering a similar bill. For this reason, the wholesalers plan to pursue a statewide solutions to the proposed distribution cap increases, Manis said.

Manis did not return a call requesting comment in time for publication.

Despite the objection from wholesale organizations, the delegation gave its unanimous support to the changes. Delegates Dan Cox (R-District 4) and Barrie Ciliberti (R-District 4) were absent from the meeting and vote.

Delegate Jesse Pippy (R-District 4), who previously served on the Frederick County liquor board and stepped down to run for office, said he could only speculate on the fates of the delegation’s liquor bills. He expected the ones with statewide impact to face the biggest battles in committee, including the production and distribution bill discussed Friday.

“I think the delegation’s intent is to show we support our manufacturers in our county ... and we encourage them to be successful,” Pippy said.

Right now, brewers in Frederick County are being artificially constrained by production, sale and distribution caps, Atticks said in an interview on Thursday.

Frederick County is under added pressure because neighboring communities have more relaxed alcohol laws. Loudoun County, Virginia, in particular has sought to move businesses out of Maryland, he said. West Virginia and Pennsylvania, similarly, have more relaxed rules than Maryland.

The goal is not to blow off the caps completely — though it would double production limits from 22,500 to 45,000 barrels and distribution limits from 3,000 to 6,000 barrels — but to give the breweries a road map for the next 15 to 20 years to expand without having to come back to the General Assembly annually for small changes, Atticks said.

“We’re saying raise limits to reasonable amounts [so] our brewers have generational change,” Atticks said.

Agritourism snag

While the delegation moves forward with one exception, County Executive Jan Gardner pumped the brakes hard on another for agricultural tourism.

Young drafted a bill at the request of the Brewers Association of Maryland, which would allow up to 200 people to occupy a farm building for an agritourism event without meeting certain building codes. Currently, the county allows up to 50 people.

“The county has not — and will not — exempt an applicant from building code requirements for public gatherings in barns,” Gardner wrote in a strongly worded letter to the Frederick County delegation on Friday.

Gardner said in an interview later Friday that she had no idea this bill was coming. The county has not had problems with traditional agritourism venues, such as pumpkin patches, hayrides, corn mazes and Christmas tree farms, but craft beverage events and wedding venues on farms were raising new concerns and, a year ago, she convened a work group with the Frederick County Farm Bureau and Atticks to discuss it.

As a result, a provision was added under the county’s agritourism code that would allow craft beverage events by permit, but they were not to be exempted from building codes. The proposed bill in front of the delegation, however, appears to try to undo that work, she said.

“I wanted to have it drafted so if we were going to go forward with it, it’d be ready. ... Evidently, she isn’t too fond of it,” Young said on Friday.

The Maryland Farm Bureau supports the occupancy increase for traditional agritourism in Frederick County, said Colby Ferguson, director of government relations for the state chapter. This would include existing Christmas tree farms and corn mazes, some of which were potentially nearing the 50-person cap on busy days.

By law, to accommodate 200 people, the building must be “structurally sound and in good repair” and have egresses that meet or exceed the International Building Code. Gardner did not know, however, if the county was allowed to supersede life and safety codes for agritourism.

If the bill moves forward, she may have to consider moving the craft beverage event permit out of the agritourism section of county law, Gardner said.

“It’s the craft beverage case, which is completely different. It’s not seasonal like the rest of these,” Gardner said.

Follow Samantha Hogan on Twitter: @SAHogan.

Samantha Hogan is the state house, environment, agriculture and energy reporter for The Frederick News-Post.

(16) comments


Wholesalers are part of a made-up industry and do not need to be protected. They do not add value, do not produce anything, and do not help consumers. Please, please, please, do not make decisions based on their needs.


Folks, Mr. Manis and the Maryland Beer Wholesalers Association are NOT our friends. He, and they, have one purpose, to LIMIT our choices, REDUCE competition, DICTATE our options and CONTROL and PROFIT from every drop of alcohol sold in the state of MD. It's that simple!

In much the same way that China and North Korea limit/control the what, when, where and how of their respective proletariats, so too does Mr. Manis and his anti-competitive, anti-consumer, anti-free-choice Maryland Beer Wholesalers Association thugs want to control your/our choices.

Furthermore, it should be said, if the swill being protected by Mr. Manis were of a higher quality so as to compete with our locally crafted products, he and they wouldn't need to engage in such anti-consumer protectionist activities! Many of us enjoy the products produced by Milkhouse Brewery, Flying Dog, et al. because they are high quality. As such, limiting their sales, in any way, to protect inferior products manufactured out-of-state or country by large corporations is both insane and anti-American!

Do we limit the amount of food sold by small local restaurants to protect Ruby Tuesday's or Applebees? NO! Do we set limits on the amount of craft cheese made by local farmers to protect Kraft? No! Do we limit the sale of locally made ice-cream to protect Hershey's? Of course not!

Then why would do we permit Mr. Manis and the Maryland Beer Wholesalers Association thugs to limit the sale of locally crafted beer (that has manifold positive economic impacts) in the name of protecting large corporations like Anheuser-Busch?


Personally, I consider the products produced by Milkhouse Brewery, Flying Dog, et al. every bit as much swill as what you say Manis is trying to protect. I've yet to try a "craft beer" that I would buy a second glass of.


Well then, I should think, you will not object to a fair and level playing field--let the consumers make their own choices.


Why would I object to a fair and level playing field? I don't care what other people like anymore than other people care what I like. Let the consumers make their own choices? When did I imply that they shouldn't be allowed to? I couldn't care less about the "craft beer" industry.


CD, I always tell folks that say they don't like beer, that they just haven't found a beer they like...yet. What's your favorite brand or style? Flying Dog tends to over-hop their beers (IMHO), but there are many other brewers and styles from our area.


Gab, I prefer imports; Stella Artois, Smithwicks, Guinness, Tennents, Boddington, Warsteiner, etc. I've tried some of those so "craft beers" when I've been in a bar or pub that's had some and, as I've said, I've yet to like one enough to buy a second. I've gotten to where I'll ask for a sample first to save wasting money on a pint.


CD, I'm a Trappist ale fan myself, Chimay being my favorite. Locally, Monocacy Brewing's Oatmeal Stout is very good. I've just found out about Steinhardt Brewing Co. from Braddock Heights. Having one of their Black Abbey Belgian Dark Ales as I type. Exceptional!


More for the rest of us.


You can have them.


I am.


To each his own.


That’s always been my mantra.


Quite a bit of hyperbole in this comment. Thugs? C'mon, really? However, I do agree that the distributors are a hindrance to the growth of the craft breweries. That needs to stop immediately. These folks are certainly within their rights to Express their opinions, but that should be where it stops. The backroom deals, and in-kind influences must not be allowed. If the product(s) the distributors are hawking are superior to the startup competition, they will prevail. Let the markets work their magic.


I agree. The liquor industry is desperately trying to keep the 3 tier distribution system. The distributors have essentially had a monopoly since prohibition was lifted.


One Dem wants to do one thing, and another Dem wants to do another. And everyone complains about the Repubs. Laughing all the way to the polls.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Already a member?

Login Now
Click Here!

Currently a News-Post subscriber?

Activate your membership at no additional charge.
Click Here!

Need more information?

Learn about the benefits of membership.
Click Here!

Ready to join?

Choose the membership plan that fits your needs.
Click Here!