The Roops

Sam and Mary Jane Roop at their farm in Thurmont.

Members of Frederick County’s agricultural community say a state bill recently signed into law will be a game-changer for farmers looking to make their operations more friendly to the Chesapeake Bay.

Senate Bill 344, which Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) signed shortly after session ended, allows the state to pay farmers 100 percent of the costs of implementing certain best management practices aimed at combating harmful runoff. Before, the state would cover no more than 87.5 percent of such costs, which farmers say often left them to bear an unreasonably high burden.

The change “could be huge to an individual that is not working with a big profit margin,” like farmers running smaller operations, said Hans Schmidt, an employee with the state agriculture department’s resource conservation office and one of the bill’s main advocates.

Schmidt said he’s aiming to encourage practices that are good for the environment, even if they may not lead to more revenue for the farmer. In some cases, his recommended course of action could even require a farmer to take a portion of their fields out of production.

Examples of these projects include planting buffer strips of vegetation between fields and water sources to intercept runoff, installing underground pipes to take it away or creating designated wetland areas to store it.

When rain falls on farms without these practices in place, manure and fertilizer can wash into nearby water bodies. There, the nutrients in the manure cause algae to grow on the surface, which blocks sunlight from reaching plants and animals beneath.

That process — called eutrophication — depletes oxygen levels in the bay watershed, creating “dead zones” that can’t support any life. Curbing eutrophication from agricultural runoff is a crucial step toward saving the bay, according to the Chesapeake Bay Foundation.

But implementing some of the most expensive best management practices can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, said Denny Remsburg, who manages the Catoctin and Frederick Soil Conservation Districts. In the past, he added — even with state funding available to cover most of a project — the remaining out-of-pocket cost to farmers served as a deterrent.

“Eighty-seven and a half percent is a big chunk,” said Remsburg, whose work involves examining farmers’ properties and making recommendations on how they can prevent nutrient runoff. “But 12 and a half percent is also a big chunk if it’s coming out of your pocket and your operating expenses.”

It wasn’t ideal to expect small producers — who often are already operating on slim margins — to foot that bill, said Colby Ferguson, a Woodsboro-based farmer and the Frederick County Farm Bureau’s government relations director.

In fact, the bill was inspired by conversations with farmers across the state who said just that, Schmidt said. His department crafted the bill and shepherded it through Annapolis.

Sam Roop, president of the Frederick County Farm Bureau, paid for the installation of grass buffer strips to protect the streams on his grain and cattle farm three years ago. He said he’s hopeful the bill will make producers more likely to implement sustainable practices.

“I just think it’s really huge,” Roop said. “It really means a lot.”

The bill is a step toward completion of Maryland’s Watershed Implementation Plan, Schmidt said, which lays out goals for bay restoration that the state must meet by 2025.

There are limits embedded in the legislation, which will go into effect July 1. The program won’t provide more than $200,000 per farm, and it won’t cover every best management practice. Some projects will still be eligible for only 87.5 percent funding, like manure management practices, Schmidt said.

Still, there was widespread support for the funding boost. The Chesapeake Bay Foundation, the Delmarva Chicken Association and the Maryland Farm Bureau were among the groups that submitted letters of support for the bill to the General Assembly.

Saving farmers money is an environmental venture as well as an economic one, Roop and Schmidt said. While agriculture and sustainability are sometimes seen as being at odds, experts stress that it’s important for established farms to stay in business. Otherwise, they may be forced to sell their land for urban development — which wouldn’t be good for the bay, either.

“There’s a balancing act of trying to keep the environment clean, producing food and trying to make sure our farmers are profitable and stay on the landscape,” Schmidt said.

Follow Jillian Atelsek on Twitter: @jillian_atelsek

(7) comments


"Senate Bill 344, which Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan (R) signed shortly after session ended, allows the state to pay farmers 100 percent of the costs of implementing certain best management practices aimed at combating harmful runoff. Before, the state would cover no more than 87.5 percent of such costs, which farmers say often left them to bear an unreasonably high burden."

Why are we doing this? We don't pay petroleum refiners, coal fired power plants, etc. to control their pollution so why should we pay farmers to control their emissions? The costs of pollution control should be added to the price of the goods and those demanding the goods should pay the price, not all of the tax payers.

Why are farmers complaining about a "unreasonably high burden when the government covered 87.5% of the cost of controlling pollution that the farmers are 100% responsible for? If Farmers were truly good stewards of our natural resources, they would not need money from tax payers and/or the government to control their pollution. There are other ways to address the problem such as regulations requiring middle men and stores to purchase a certain percentage from local farmers or to require all supplies to document use of "best practices," in order to level the playing field and pass the costs on to the ultimate end users.


We are doing this because it is the right thing to do to save Mother Earth!! And to save the children!!


The right thing to do is make the polluters pay. If, for example, someone is a vegetarian, should they be taxed to control pollution coming from factory animal farms (CAFOs/AFOs)? WHy shouldn't Tyson's be paying for all the chickens/turkeys raised under their brand instead of passing those costs off onto the actual chicken/turkey growers?




As has been previously explained md1756, farmers do not set the prices for their goods, and consumers would howl if they had to pay the full price at the supermarket. Farmers must accept the price at the markets, which are controlled by middlemen. For example: Holding out for a better price is not an option for perishable goods. Farmers must be profitable, or there is no longer a reason to farm. No farms, no food, unless you are totally self-sufficient. Why else do you think farms are sold off to developers?


Therefore, the state and maybe federal governments need to step in to regulate the middle men. For example, with the factory farms, companies such as Tyson are pushing the problems of cleanup on the farmers with Tyson's control of prices and contracts they have with the growers. Regulators could require Tyson and other major companies to include the cost of pollution control in their contract for what they pay the growers.


No excuses now.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Already a member?

Login Now
Click Here!

Currently a News-Post subscriber?

Activate your membership at no additional charge.
Click Here!

Need more information?

Learn about the benefits of membership.
Click Here!

Ready to join?

Choose the membership plan that fits your needs.
Click Here!