Campaign signs

A political campaign sign is seen Monday at Baltimore National Pike and Brethren Church Road near Myersville.

ANNAPOLIS —

Nearly four months after the 2018 election, there’s at least one lingering reminder of it: campaign signs.

Posted along roads, tacked to fences or knocked over in the wind, campaign signs remain in public view long after the campaigns end. However, beyond reporting the leftovers to county officials, there is little residents can do to make them go away.

There is no county law stating that signs have to removed within a specific number of days after an election, Frederick County Election Director Stuart Harvey said on Thursday. Any campaign signs left may still be standing because no one has contacted his office with complaints, he said.

The county used to have an ordinance that set a time limit for signs before and after elections, but that it was revised several years ago, County Attorney John Mathias said via email. That ordinance, which was revised in 2006, allowed campaign signs to be placed in the county between 45 days before the primary election, to 15 days after the general election.

“A Supreme Court decision from a few years ago likely made this type of sign regulation unconstitutional,” Mathias said.

The case was City of Ladue v. Gilleo, which the court offered an opinion in 1994. Two decades later, in 2014, the nation’s highest court ruled again that governments could not regulate signs based on their content in Reed v. Town of Gilbert. This made towns and cities across the country re-evaluate sign ordinances, since election signs could not be treated different from other signs.

Harvey and Dave Ennis, department head of the Office of Highway and Facility Maintenance in the county’s Division of Public Works, said Maryland’s State Highway Administration has jurisdiction on sign removal in the public right of way near state highways, such as U.S. 15. The county code does not allow any signs within the county public right of way, with a few exceptions, such as traffic signs, Mathias said.

If Ennis receives a complaint on a sign in a county public right of way, he will often direct that complaint to Harvey, whose office will then contact political campaigns and ask for the signs to be removed.

Sen. Michael Hough (R-Frederick & Carroll) has dealt with this personally after posting more than 500 signs in the last election campaign.

He and other Republicans attracted ire on Facebook after the election for still having signs visible in Frederick County over 100 days after the election.

Hough said he tries to collect most signs after the election, but he does not know the location of all the signs that carry his name. The signs are distributed by volunteers and delegates before the election, and there is no way to know where they all end up, he said.

He pushed back, however, that he has also seen more than just signs bearing his name still up in the county. And, if signs are on private property, then they can stay up year-round.

“I try to get them all when I can,” Hough said on Thursday.

Kevin Demosky, director of the county’s Department of Utilities and Solid Waste Management, said his office is not involved in the removal of campaign signs and sees them only if they are brought in as trash or recycling through the county transfer station. One way a sign is removed immediately from a county right of way is if a complaint comes in to Ennis’ office concerning the safety of the road or intersection.

“We try not to touch any campaign signs ... unless it’s an immediate safety hazard. So say people put signs at an intersection and it impedes traffic from seeing oncoming traffic, then we’ll go in and remove signs,” Ennis said.

Ennis said his office gets more complaints about trash and debris in the county right of way than campaign signs.

“We’re always looking to maintain a safe road and a safe condition in accordance with county code,” he said.

Staff writer Steve Bohnel contributed to this column.

Follow Samantha Hogan on Twitter: @SAHogan.

Samantha Hogan is the state house, environment, agriculture and energy reporter for The Frederick News-Post.

(6) comments

KellyAlzan

Councilman Steve still has a sign up on rt 75

Frayou

Somewhat of an irony when politicians run on an issue of pro-environment only to liter the landscape with uncollected election signs. Rt 15/340 is a mess with polluted liter. Some from ongoing development of so call Jefferson Technology Park. Some from the open ends of garbage trucks on way to landfill and others from general traffic. Election & Reality Development signs as well.

Reader1954

might as well call them to get their signs removed, probably the only thing you will get them to do if they were the one that got elected

DickD

Signs are difficult to track for the elections. But they should be removed and it is not just Hough.

LeonardKeepers

they ought to bring back that ordinance that political signs be removed x amount of days after the elections. i shudder to think how political advertisements will be like in 2020.

KellyAlzan

Freedom of speech. Non enforceable

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.