Undeterred by an unfavorable committee vote and budget language targeting Maryland Planning Secretary Wendi Peters’ paycheck come July 1, Gov. Larry Hogan reappointed her this week.

Hogan (R) said earlier this spring that his office would make a final announcement on Peters’ role in the administration at the close of the General Assembly’s 90-day session.

Last month, the governor withdrew his nomination of Peters, who is from Mount Airy, after she received an unfavorable vote from the Senate Executive Nominations Committee. Senators then learned that Peters remained in the position at the Maryland Department of Planning, despite the committee’s vote and the likelihood that she would receive a negative vote from the full chamber.

On Wednesday, Hogan spokeswoman Amelia Chasse confirmed that the governor’s office had reappointed Peters and the state’s health secretary, Dennis Schrader. Hogan also pulled Schrader’s nomination this session after he had not received a confirmation vote by early April.

In response, the Senate amended the state budget to strip funding for Hogan nominees who were put forward this session but did not receive confirmation votes because they were withdrawn from consideration. The budget would stop the salaries for Peters and Schrader at the start of the new fiscal year, July 1.

The governor’s office said Wednesday that the budget language was not a concern.

“The language they smuggled into the budget is unconstitutional and they know it,” Chasse said in a written statement.

But senators felt the budget move was necessary to cement their constitutional role of providing advice and consent on gubernatorial nominations. It was made after consultation from the Office of the Attorney General, which recrafted previous budget language to apply to Peters at the time, and now to Schrader, as well.

Sen. Bill Ferguson, D-Baltimore city, chairman of the Executive Nominations Committee, said during the General Assembly session that the governor’s choice to pull the Cabinet secretaries, then reappoint them, amounted to a constitutionally murky end run around the Senate.

The Maryland Constitution states: “No person, after being rejected by the Senate, shall be again nominated for the same office at the same Session, unless at the request of the Senate; or, be appointed to the same office during the recess of the Legislature.”

But because Hogan took action when he did — after a committee vote on Peters but before final action by the full Senate chamber — the governor might have cover for his decision to reappoint.

“Nothing prevents the Governor from choosing as his recess appointee the person whose nomination had been submitted but then withdrawn,” the letter to Ferguson states.

Nevertheless, it was an unusual move, Ferguson said.

“This is unprecedented,” Ferguson said in early April. “We have not, in the long history of Maryland, had a situation where the role and duty — the constitutional duty entrusted in us by the people of Maryland — has been bypassed.”

Committee members said they voted against Peters’ nomination after hearing concerns of low morale and micromanagement in the planning office, along with complaints that the state’s previous planning priorities have been put on the back burner. The governor’s office said the unfavorable vote was a “shameful” example of partisan politics.

Chasse reiterated that point on Wednesday.

“For three months members of the legislature played partisan games with Secretary Peters, and she is too qualified for this position to be subject to the whims of partisan politicians,” she said.

Ferguson said he has requested an additional advice letter from the Office of the Attorney General to explore options moving forward.

He said the uncertainty related to the constitutionality of the reappointments puts the state in a precarious position.

“What really scares me ... I believe that these are unconstitutional reappointments. It sort of puts in jeopardy any official actions they take on behalf of the state,” he said.

The new letter will address who would have legal standing to file legal action relating to the appointments — if it comes to that.

“We are exploring every possibility,” Ferguson said.

Follow Danielle E. Gaines on Twitter: @danielleegaines.

Danielle E. Gaines covers politics and government in Frederick County, splitting her time between Winchester Hall and The State House. Having grown up in Illinois, she lived in New York and California before settling in Maryland.

(10) comments

gorillagusto

Sheesh. How shallow is the Republican bench that Hogan is fighting with the refs to put the water boy into the game?

jerseygrl42

Good for Hogan and one would hope that busch and miller might have more important things to do ...but apparently NOT!,, they need a permanent vacation

FrederickFan

I just wrote a huge tax check to the state of Maryland - so Hogan can waste it on an unqualified, Secretary of Planning? Once again, the Democrats are spending my money more wisely than the Republicans. I'm never voting for Hogan.

The Democrats find people to run Maryland Departments who actually know what they're doing. Hogan just appoints faces. Kelly Shultz as Secretary of Labor and Licensing is yet another Hogan waste of my tax dollars.

DickD

Hogan is your typical Republican.

KAYoho

How many of Gov. Hogan's appointees were actually rejected? If these were the only two that received unfavorables and potential rejection, maybe it's not just partisan politics.

Titanman123

Why I should Hogan falling on his sword for this lady? A basic look at her resume shows she's not qualified. A small town city council member and paralegal? Total joke!

Eric Beasley

Four out of seven of the Secretaries of Planning (since the departments creation in 1969) have not been certified planners or had resumes which included planning. In fact, former Secretary David Craig and Audrey Scott have similar resumes. Other past secretaries had 0 experience in planning, as is the case with Secretary Roy W. Kienitz and Harriet Tregoning.

Source: http://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/09dept/html/biosf.html#planning

Titanman123

Since it's a slow day at work, I decided to Google the people you mentioned to see there qualifications. David Craig was a long time elected official and county executive...very qualified. Audrey Scott served as an official in the dept of housing and urban development. Harriet Tregoning worked at the EPA. Finally, Roy kientz was the staff director for the senate committee on environment and public works. All very qualified while Wendy was a councilman and paralegal.

Ellenatodd

Utter nonsense by the DEM-controlled legislature. Respectfully, it's time to vote out the cronies and political hacks. Oh, that's right. This is the same group that opposed a bipartisan group to stop gerrymandering of the voting districts. Time for voters to STAND UP and call for term limits!

DickD

We have term limits, Ellen, they are called elections.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.