Two Maryland officials should receive months of back pay, an Anne Arundel County Circuit Court judge has ruled.

In an opinion entered Thursday, Judge Ronald A. Silkworth ordered that former Maryland Planning Secretary Wendi Peters and current Health Secretary Dennis Schrader must be paid — even though Democratic General Assembly lawmakers tried to block their salaries after Republican Gov. Larry Hogan’s administration withdrew their nominations in an unusual move at the end of the last legislative session.

The decision was appealed by the Office of the Attorney General, representing Maryland Treasurer Nancy K. Kopp (D) on Thursday afternoon.

When the new budget year started on July 1, Kopp refused to release the secretaries’ paychecks based on the General Assembly’s budget language and her office said the salaries would not resume until the treasurer was advised that the payments are legal.

To restore Peters’ paycheck in September, Hogan appointed her to a new position, special secretary of smart growth, and her salary is similar to what she would have been paid as planning secretary. Schrader was also given an additional title — acting deputy secretary of Medicaid at the Department of Health — with the same pay as his health secretary position, but has not been paid since July.

Hogan withdrew his appointments of both Peters and Schrader during the General Assembly session, only to reappoint them after legislators left the State House. Peters received a negative committee vote on her appointment, while Schrader’s nomination was withdrawn before any vote.

The governor’s ultimate decision to withdraw and then reappoint Peters and Schrader amounted to an end run around the Senate’s constitutional duty to advise and consent to high-level appointments, lawmakers said at the time. As a precaution, Democrats added the budget language that would stop pay for any gubernatorial nominees who were reappointed after being withdrawn before a full Senate vote.

Opinions and legal advice from the Maryland Office of the Attorney General have concluded that both Hogan’s reappointments and the General Assembly’s restrictive budget language were lawful.

At a court hearing last month, an attorney for the Hogan administration argued that the state’s constitution grants the governor wide authority to appoint gubernatorial nominees and that it was inappropriate for lawmakers to pre-empt the governor’s appointment powers through the budget bill, which cannot be vetoed. If the budget restriction were allowed to stand, there would be no limit to the Legislature’s ability to limit the governor’s appointment powers, said Timothy F. Maloney, who represents Peters and Schrader.

However, Julia Doyle Bernhardt, chief of litigation for the Office of the Attorney General, made a similar argument about the Senate’s role in confirming appointments. If a governor could withdraw and then reappoint recess nominees, it would completely bypass the confirmation process year after year, she said.

Silkworth sided with Maloney, writing that the budget language exceeded the Legislature’s authority, attempted to limit the governor’s appointment authority and amounted to “impermissible” legislating through the state’s budget.

The constitutional clash is a case of first impression in Maryland courts and the Democratic leader of the Senate’s Executive Nominations Committee, Baltimore Sen. Bill Ferguson, said last month he believed the case would head to state appeals courts no matter the outcome.

On Thursday, Ferguson said a portion of the judge’s opinion in the case — that the budget language in question “has no fiscal purpose” because it did not specifically address an appropriation, but broadly applied a budget restriction — will add another wrinkle to the case during the appeals process.

Ferguson said every state budget includes a number of restrictions or conditions on funding for any number of reasons. “That has been a fundamental part of the state budget for hundreds of years,” Ferguson said.

A spokesman for Hogan’s office called for the judge’s opinion to bring an end to the matter.

“It is unfortunate that it took a court order to do it, but justice, common sense, and the rule of law have finally prevailed in this case,” spokesman Douglass Mayer said. “It is far past time for the Senate President, Attorney General, and Treasurer to stop this sad political game, do the right thing, and accept the court’s decision. We need to put this disappointing and sordid affair behind us, so these dedicated public servants can be paid and continue working for the people of Maryland.”

Peters and Schrader filed the lawsuit in Anne Arundel County Circuit Court in August. Ferguson said Thursday that he hopes the state’s appellate courts will expedite the appeal. The General Assembly will convene on Jan. 10, when Hogan will nominate his recess appointments for confirmation.

Peters’ salary in her new position is in line with her previous pay as planning secretary: $137,749.

Schrader’s budgeted salary is $174,417.

Peters previously served as Maryland’s deputy planning secretary and on Mount Airy’s Town Council.

Follow Danielle E. Gaines on Twitter: @danielleegaines.

Danielle E. Gaines covers politics and government in Frederick County, splitting her time between Winchester Hall and The State House. Having grown up in Illinois, she lived in New York and California before settling in Maryland.

(14) comments

jerseygrl42

this is a farce and guess the A/G office has nothing worthwhile to do, as for Miller and Busch...they should move on as they have long ago stopped bringing any value to the citizens of MD.

DickD

The political games being played were the ones played by Hogan, He will pay for this, wait and see.

des21

Jeez Dick, if this is the most significant challenge Hogan faces he'll get 70% of the vote!

DickD

Sure, des, if that were the only thing facing someone in an election. Remember too, he won against a weak opponent.

des21

Who is running against him this time?

DickD

You will be the first person I tell, right after the announcement, Dave.[huh]

jill king

Did you watch the hearings? A majority of citizens constantly complain about service level at the state. Of course long term employees that get paid for bare minimal work for years are going to complain when someone steps in and tries to fix the service level.

This was retaliation of a firing from another office, where numerous accusations were made to high ranking officials including sexism. Pot meet kettle. And yeah, retaliation is not effective leadership on the Senate's behalf. Shame on them!

des21

65% approval rating in a solidly blue state. I like his chances.

gdunn

Best Governor this state has ever had!

FrederickFan

Paying hundreds of thousands $ to political appointees (not chosen by the voters) like Wendy Peters and Kelly Shultz, who have absolutely no idea what their departments are actually doing, have no expertise or training to do the work even if they wanted to, and who allegedly never even show up to work? No, worst Governor ever. Wasting our hard earned tax dollars.

Aslan19

Frederick, please point to ONE political appointee who has been chosen by the voters. Being appointed means that someone was not elected. Also, being picked by the voters does not mean that they are the best for the job. Just look at the Federal level! Every Senator and Representative happened to be chosen by the Voters, and the Congress has the lowest approval rating of any national organization.

jswalker1963

And yet somehow the incumbents are largely re-elected like clockwork because they by and large run unopposed in primaries and then the straight party line voters put them back in. I agree with the President that there is a swamp in DC that needs draining, unfortunately he is doing nothing to make it any better and it is more infested now than ever.

rbtdt5

You are 100% right. Lets give the president a little more time for the draining.

jswalker1963

I'd like to get hold of the person who told me never to go into government work they don't pay anything.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.