800 Oak Street Property

The property at 800 Oak St. in the city of Frederick is expected to be purchased by Frederick County Friday.

Frederick County moved closer Tuesday to purchasing a $20 million property at 800 Oak St. in Frederick.

A favorable 5-2 vote from the County Council frees up necessary funds to acquire the 26-acre property off U.S. Route 15, which includes a 209,000-square-foot facility currently being used for COVID vaccinations. The county plans to finalize the purchase Friday.

The final price tag the council approved is $32 million, which includes preparing the facility’s roofing for solar panels. The county hopes to offset a chunk of the site’s $20 million property cost — which doesn’t include costs beyond acquiring the property — by consolidating operations and improving efficiency to bring the net cost to between $7 million and $8 million, according to county officials.

Critics of the purchase, including Frederick Mayor Michael O’Connor (D) and at least four of five city of Frederick aldermen, have said the county was hasty and lacked transparency in its move to acquire the property.

County officials and council members supportive of the acquisition, however, said they had to move quickly to meet the deadline set by the Miami-based private equity firm selling the property. Moreover, they felt the pace was fair.

“I really appreciate the fact that we’re not moving at the speed of government to get this done,” Councilman Steve McKay, who voted in favor of the purchase, said during the meeting. “We all should applaud that.”

Joining McKay (R) in support of the bid were Council President M.C. Keegan-Ayer (D), Council Vice President Michael Blue (R), Councilwoman Jessica Fitzwater (D) and Councilman Jerry Donald (D).

County leaders have not finalized plans for the Oak Street facility. They hope to use it to accelerate large projects, including relocating the county’s 911 call center and adding a library to the west side of the city. Avoiding the construction of new buildings for such projects would also save the county money, officials said.

The county hopes to centralize some government services and address space needs that Chief Administrative Officer Rick Harcum said exist in “most” county departments. The county plans to retain its home in Winchester Hall and its presence in buildings along N. Market Street, Harcum said.

Council members Phil Dacey (R) and Kai Hagen (D) voted against the acquisition. Both councilmen said they felt the county should’ve been more open with city officials about its intent to purchase the Oak Street property, located in Frederick. Dacey opined the council’s vote was a slight to its city counterparts.

“This is a big generational-type decision about where to place county government within [city] boundaries, but we're not including [the city] in a seat at the table,” Dacey said during the meeting. “I don’t think that’s the right message to our city partners.”

In letters to the council, city leaders asked the county to provide documents pertaining to the property, but even under the Public Information Act, the county wasn't permitted to fulfill the city’s request until after the sale's completion, county officials said. The city’s request also included information the seller would most likely want to remain private, Harcum said, which is common in property acquisitions.

Backlash from city leaders came as a surprise to some county officials, including Keegan-Ayer, who said she hadn’t heard from her counterpart on the Board of Aldermen before receiving the first of a handful of letters from aldermen and the mayor.

“I just regret the fact that there has been this level of animosity between the county and the city,” Keegan-Ayer, whose district houses the Oak Street facility, said during the meeting. “I think that things could’ve been handled much better.”

Neither the mayor nor Kelly Russell, president pro tem for the Board of Aldermen, responded to requests for comment from The News-Post Tuesday.

Follow Jack Hogan on Twitter: @jckhogan

(14) comments


‘“I really appreciate the fact that we’re not moving at the speed of government to get this done,’ Councilman Steve McKay….” and everyone will get used to it. Sometimes the chips fall where they may.


This is an outstanding decision and will ultimately save taxpayers money and help advance the county's capital projects sooner. Failed leadership on the part of Dacey and Hagen. Hagen demonstrates his inability to even make a decision.


They may want to budget more than $32m because renovating that building is going to be costly.


They should include adding geothermal in addition to solar to help move towards the carbon neutral goals and significantly lower their operating costs for energy and the geothermal equipment has a longer life span so while it may initially cost more, the savings more than make up for the initial costs.


Shhhhh; they don't want to talk about it nor the cost of Borrowing the money; what a gross misuse of tax payer money w/o the PERMISSION of those who will pay for it ...it should have been put to a vote of the public , but of course that never happens which is why we are paying off a $93 Million boondoggle that once upon a time we were told would be a Tech Park which of course never happened but the developer profited along with others at our expense...its all about the MONEY !


Like it or not, it will soon become imperative that Frederick County closer mirror Montgomery County. Growth in the entire region must be dealt with in real time. Because of the close proximity to the highway (considering access and egress), the uses for that location have narrowed: State Farm saw it coming years ago when they decided to double down and develop the much larger campus.


Thank God, common sense has prevailed. If we are lucky the current crew at city hall will be on the way out after November's election.


Even your county guy Dacey said, "This is a big generational-type decision about where to place county government within [city] boundaries, but we're not including [the city] in a seat at the table.”


The county government has always been mostly located w/in the city. That's why it is the "county seat".


Three, isn't the current county government located within the city boundries? Kinda doesn't make sense to use that argument.


If you are going with that argument, then I think this analogy if fair: suppose you rent out rooms in your house, and two of your tenants decide to switch rooms. They should tell you before they switch rooms, right? It's probably fine, but still it is disrespectful of your tenants not to give you some notice. They are both good tenants, but still...




Unfortunately, unlikely. The Mayor and Board move at a snail's pace for everything. That is why so little gets done. If they have a problem with this because the city loses tax dollars—maybe they should stop ignoring the annual City County Tax Differential audit.

They are supposed to be doing one every year. It hasn't been done it since 2018. And the Mayor even mentioned in a debate that he has been unable to persuade the County to be fairer to city tax-payers and that maybe he should be persuasive.

Maybe???? and only just because, it’s our tax dollars O’Connor is frittering away, who cares about those?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Already a member?

Login Now
Click Here!

Currently a News-Post subscriber?

Activate your membership at no additional charge.
Click Here!

Need more information?

Learn about the benefits of membership.
Click Here!

Ready to join?

Choose the membership plan that fits your needs.
Click Here!