Annapolis Open 2019 (copy) (copy)

The General Assembly has passed multiple bills in the final week of the 2019 legislative session.

ANNAPOLIS — Lawmakers were in a rush to get bills out of committee and over the hump to the floor for a vote on Wednesday, but Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee tried a different tactic to slow-walk a bill they oppose.

Republican members of the committee used a series of procedural "holds" to delay a vote on a bill that would eliminate the state's Handgun Permit Review Board and keep it from advancing to the full House of Delegates, where Democrats have a firm majority.

"It's a very consequential bill. ... I know there's a lot of constituents back home who care about this bill, as I do," said Del. Dan Cox (R-Frederick and Carroll).

Cox used his hold on Wednesday after the committee rejected a pair of amendments from him and Del. Robin Grammer (R-Baltimore County). The amendments could have forced the bill to return to the Senate after the House considered it.

Chairman Luke Clippinger (D-Baltimore City) created the "hold" system this session. It allows each member to delay a vote or consideration of a piece of legislation. However, he told the Republican members that he reserved the right to call as many voting sessions as he wanted.

In the third voting session of the day, the committee voted 13-7 to advance the bills.

The committee also voted to conform the House version of the bill to the Senate's version, which passed 30-16 in March. Both are now emergency bills, which would immediately move concealed handgun permit appeals from the governor-appointed board to the Office of Administrative Hearings, if the bills pass.

Human trafficking

The decision to overhaul the state's human trafficking laws, on the other hand, was unanimous.

The Senate gave its final approval to a bill by Del. Jesse Pippy (R-Frederick and Carroll) that should help Maryland state’s attorneys more easily and clearly prosecute those who force, threaten, coerce or defraud people into prostitution, forced marriage or other sexual acts.

"It's a huge piece of legislation. It's statewide. It completely redoes the human trafficking statute," Pippy said on Wednesday.

The bill adds human trafficking to a list of "crimes of violence," which carry stricter sentencing and parole standards. Gov. Larry Hogan (R) sought to do this in separate legislation, which was ultimately rolled into Pippy's bill.

"I think it's an important issue for all Marylanders. We're seeing more and more cases of human trafficking across the state," Pippy said.

Patient's rights

Del. Karen Lewis Young's Patient's Bill of Rights has officially passed and is on its way to the governor's desk.

"I wasn't surprised that it went through," said Lewis Young (D-Frederick). "I was surprised that it went through in the form that was so much in favor of what the advocacy groups supported. And I was surprised that the hospital association compromised as much as they did. They have not in years past." 

Although the Maryland Hospital Association had some qualms about the original House bill, the organization was in support of it, said spokeswoman Amy Goodwin in an email. Lewis Young said she met with members of the association to discuss language, such as whether hospitals could offer the bill of rights or must provide them to patients. 

The hospital association wanted amendments that made sure the bill would allow hospitals flexibility in adapting the bill to meet their patient needs. 

"Maryland hospitals strongly support patients’ rights to information, fair treatment and autonomy over medical decisions, among other rights. They view patients and family members as an essential part of their health care teams. That partnership is apparent in each hospital’s patient bill of rights," Nicole Stallings, senior vice president of government affairs and policy for the association, said in a statement.

Banned in Maryland

The General Assembly also took final action on three bans on Wednesday.

Minors under the age of 18 will no longer be able to use commercial tanning beds, nor will young adults under the age of 21 be able to purchase cigarettes, cigars or electronic cigarette devices unless they present a military ID. 

The exemption for military personnel was added by Hough, who served in the U.S. Air Force as a teen and worked on thermonuclear missiles.

"I don't think people should smoke. I'm not a smoking advocate by any means," Hough said in an interview afterward.

His issue with the bill, as it was originally drafted, was that at age 18 the state determines teenagers are old enough to marry, divorce and fight in the military. If teenagers are old enough to those things but not decide to smoke, then there are inconsistencies in the law, he said.

The Senate and House also cast their final votes to ban plastic foam food containers statewide starting July 1, 2020.

Sen. Cheryl Kagan (D-Montgomery) fended off two last-minute amendments to create a waiver system and to exempt churches and civic organizations from the ban. Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. said he was skeptical that organizations would be prosecuted under the ban, but that the law would be a means to phase out the product's use in Maryland.

"I've been working on this bill for three years and I'm very proud that Maryland is at the cutting edge of banning foam, which is so bad for our environment," Kagan said.

Staff writer Heather Mongilio contributed to this report. 

Follow Samantha Hogan on Twitter: @SAHogan.

Samantha Hogan is the state house, environment, agriculture and energy reporter for The Frederick News-Post.

(17) comments

shiftless88

By the way, the law doesn't say you cannot smoke at 18, just that you cannot purchase cigarettes, cigars and vape stuff.

elymus43

The democrats must be scared of guns. Annapolis never says anything about Baltimore, Detroit, Chicago, or Washington,DC (all democrat strongholds).

DickD

If you have a fear of walking around Frederick without a concealed gun, you have a mental problem. Police, security agents, bank truck guards and a few others need guns, the average citizen doesn't.

gabrielshorn2013

No fear in Frederick, Dick, unless I was walking around past midnight (which I would never do BTW). Anywhere in Baltimore (except the inner harbor), there is no way I would go there unarmed after dark.

DickD

Obviously, Gabe, you don't need a gun![beam]

shiftless88

I wouldn't walk in a dangerous part of town after midnight even with a gun and I doubt you would do so, either. So it is a moot argument.

TomWheatley

Purchasing cigarettes and foam containers ... In the meantime, no mention at all about the bill to let people use a standard deduction on their federal and itemize on the Maryland one to save some money. Oh whoops, my bad. Saving money for the taxpayer in Maryland is seldom an option...

DickD

The only way you come out ahead is if your itemized deductions are greater than the federal standard deduction, which is $12,000 for singles, $24,000 for joint and extra $1,300 for each filer that is over 65.

TomWheatley

True and they are in my case, however let me rephrase that. Maryland does not give one the choice of making that decision. Standard on Fed means standard on State and itemized on Federal means you are locked into itemized on State. That is what the bill is for, but is not going to get looked at this year (again).

jgrose79

Yet again Democrats ramrod another ignorant anti gun bill through which will do nothing for public safety and the murderers in Baltimore and PG County. Targeting the law abiding and forcing them to get a lawyer to fight in the OAH when they have a grievance with MSP is pathetic.
Top it off with more out of touch laws to try to force people to do as they're told with the change in purchasing cigarettes by 18 year old citizens. Give me a break. If you are deemed an adult at 18, you can be charged as an adult at 18 in a court of law, and be married on your own accord there is no reason why you cant make your own decisions what to do with your body. Democrats want teens to be able to abort their babies without parental consent because they are apparently old enough to make those tough choices, but you're considered to young at 18 to decide if you want to smoke? The democrats are hypocritical, and the fact that people cannot see how far they bend to fit their agenda is pathetic!

BugsnBunnys

jgrose79...EXCELLENT COMMENTS! I would seriously vote for you if you ran for office! Hopefully you'd run in Maryland...we need all the help we can get from these left leaning politicians!!!

DickD

Funny, Bunny![lol]

Samanthapowers

Bending to agendas? You mean like the sad sack republicans in congress bowing down to their boy king? talk about wet noodles. that is the disgrace. don't worry, you can still play with your guns.

DickD

They can only play with their guns if they are careful, Sam. Otherwise they might shoot themselves in the foot.

TomWheatley

And here I thought one would shoot their eye out :)

DickD

jg, you want more guns on the streets? SMH

shiftless88

jgrose; should we lower the drinking age to 18 then? After all, it is generally conservatives who pushed the drinking age up to 21 in the first place.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.