A Public Information Act dispute between Frederick County Councilman Billy Shreve (R) and county officials was resolved late this week, with more information soon headed toward Shreve’s office.

Shreve — who is prolific in his filing of information requests to county administration — had asked a state mediation program to intervene on a recent request earlier in the week.

County Executive Jan Gardner (D) said Friday that the county has worked to comply with Shreve’s information requests and that recent discussions with the county’s legal team resulted in a decision to revisit the request he said was not completed.

On Sept. 21, Shreve sent two Public Information Act requests to the county’s administration. The first was for a list of all zoning violations from Sept. 6, 2015, to Sept. 6, 2016 (he’d already requested and received a list of violations in 2016 and 2017). Shreve’s second request on Sept. 21 was for all contact information for each person who initiated a zoning complaint from Sept. 6, 2015, to Sept. 6, 2017.

The county attorney’s office initially responded that the second part of Shreve’s request — for complainant information — would take about six hours to complete and the estimated cost for planning and permitting staff to create the information would be $200.

Under the Maryland Public Information Act, government agencies can charge a “reasonable fee” for copies of public records. Governments can also charge a reasonable fee for searching for a public record, but the first two hours of search time are free.

When Shreve’s administrative assistant challenged the charge, the county attorney’s office responded that the information request was being rerouted through the county executive’s office.

Gardner said this week that the county briefly considered charging a fee, but decided against it.

“Part of the reason we’re doing this is because he’s a councilman. So we’re trying to accommodate his requests,” Gardner said this week.

On Oct. 23, Shreve was provided with a 41-page document that included basic details of 247 cases. Some of the items included contact information; others did not.

One of the complaints listed — a temporary dumpster — was reported by Shreve, according to the document.

In a news release Tuesday, Shreve announced that he requested the involvement of the Public Access Ombudsman’s Office because the complainant information had not been received in the 30-day time frame specified in Maryland’s Public Information Act.

The office mediates disputes between government bodies and those who have filed requests under the Maryland Public Information Act.

“It is a sad day in Frederick County when an elected Council Member has to file a MPIA request to obtain public information,” Shreve said in the news release. “I am appealing to the State Ombudsman for any help in this matter. I would remind the County Executive that the voters of this great County enabled me to be their voice and their representative, and I ask, how am I supposed to do that job effectively if I am unable to receive information which I have requested.”

Shreve said he has had difficulty obtaining information from county offices since he and Gardner took office under the new charter government structure in December 2014.

So far in 2017, Gardner said her office has received 38 requests for information from Shreve through an administrative process and four Public Information Act requests.

Whether the second half of Shreve’s Sept. 21 request was fulfilled adequately was “slicing hairs,” given that some contact information was included, Gardner said.

She said county legal staff had two things to consider in evaluating Shreve’s request: whether the contact information for private citizens must be released and whether the county was required to create a new record to respond to Shreve, as opposed to simply releasing records that already exist. The state law does not require the creation of new records.

After legal discussion, the county decided to go through all 250 cases to see if there is additional complainant information that was not initially released, Gardner said Friday.

Planning staff members believe that up to half of the records may not include any complainant information, she said.

“I will say, I think there’s a question about what is he going to do with the information. I think there’ll still be concern among the public that we’re releasing their names and contact information,” Gardner said. “... I am a little uncomfortable with releasing people’s names and phone numbers.”

In any active cases, where releasing contact information could influence the case, complainant information won’t be released, Gardner said.

On Friday evening, Shreve said that he intends to review the zoning violation information and complainant information to “look at it and see if there are any trends.”

“I also want to see how complete their records are,” Shreve said.

Gardner said she hopes releasing the information will not create a chilling effect that would discourage county residents from reporting a zoning violation.

Shreve has clashed with Gardner and county planning officials about zoning violations since the closing of a wedding venue in the county in 2016, when county officials found the business operating without necessary zoning approval or building, occupancy, electric or plumbing permits.

Shreve has questioned enforcement efforts, and at a July council meeting likened county zoning enforcers to South American gangs.

On Friday, Shreve said he was troubled by the number of zoning complaints being investigated.

“It’s like we have a secret police force out there looking for. ... I don’t know what they’re looking for,” he said.

Part of the tension over information-sharing stems from the division of the administrative and legislative branches under the new charter government.

The Frederick County Charter includes a section about “non-interference” between the executive and legislative branches of government. The charter says that neither the council nor any of its members “shall appoint, dismiss, or give directions to any individual employee of the Executive Branch of the Government,” with some exceptions. The non-interference section goes on to say that “it shall be the duty of the Executive to provide any information that is requested by the Council in writing for the purpose of introducing and evaluating legislation or to engage in the review and monitoring of Government programs, activities and policy implementation.”

Under charter government, “the Council” is generally presumed to mean a majority of members; the document says that the council is to “act as a body.”

Under a section detailing the duties of the county executive, the charter includes “providing the Council with any information the Executive deems necessary or, as the Council in writing may request, information concerning the executive branch which the Council may require for the exercise of its powers.”

Follow Danielle E. Gaines on Twitter: @danielleegaines.

Danielle E. Gaines covers politics and government in Frederick County, splitting her time between Winchester Hall and The State House. Having grown up in Illinois, she lived in New York and California before settling in Maryland.

(19) comments


He is just rummaging trying to find something he complain about


Somebody should investigate all the County Permits Blaine Young and company (Shreve and Delauter) approved, waived fees for infrastructure. I do not understand why no one has investigated them, or have they and the FNP hasn't reported on it.


Billy, go join Blaine, wherever he is, hopefully we will not hear from you for another 10 years, same as Blaine, but Blaine even lied to us about that.


That photo could make a cat jump straight up in the air.


I am suspicious any time Shreve does anything. If what he is looking into is so important, the rest of the council should back him up. Since even KD seems to be silent on the matter, I can only surmise he has some personal ax to grind over his own zoning (or one of his cronies). Certainly nothing to waste time and money on.


Someone should do a PIA request about all the government waste caused by Shreve. Or about all the liason meetings for which he has not bothered to show up. About Shreve abstaining from dozens of votes. About all the abuses of government carried out by Shreve when he was a tool for Blaine Young. Shame on you if you have ever voted for this offensive, destructive buffoon.


Obviously he is looking to see if their is a trend and certain persons are being targeted. Unfourtanly their seems to be some employees in the county government that have a vendetta. Some county officials seem to get much personal satisfaction out of making people's lives difficult. Their are several of these incidents that are currently being investigated.

The real issue is that county zoning and permit laws need to be changed. The ridiculous zoning and permit regulations are making normally law abiding citizens criminals. If you do anything other then just come home and go to bed you are most likely breaking some zoning or permitting law.


The real issue is keeping industrial facilities away from residential homes, solid waste dumps away from schools, and car dealerships in designated areas, etc. I'm glad we have zoning laws in Frederick County.


38 requests this year? I certainly don't want someone calling me if I made a complaint - my information should be kept private. He is clearly searching for ways to make the charter govt look bad and in doing so is totally wasting work time for dozens of people. Talk about government waste? He still acts like a toddler - throws a fit when he doesn't get his way. Guess that's just how some men behave?


Shreve and Donna K are two peas in a pod.


Billy is simply a big waste of time not to be taken seriously 😒. Once he gets the information, what does he plan to do with it? Other then to conspire against Jan Gardner. He has no other interest.


Said Billy, “It is a sad day in Frederick County when an elected Council Member has to file a MPIA request to obtain public information,”
No, Billy. The truly sad day is when you became an elected member of the Board of County Commissioners.


I missed the importance in the article why Shreve needs all this particular information...If there's a problem investigate it but he's a councilman not
a detective...What if he doesn't find anything will he then tell everybody he wasted a lot time and effort for nothing...I doubt it !!!


That's what he is doing. He is trying to investigate. It states that.


He said on Friday he was 'troubled by the number of zoning complaints being investigated' not the TOTAL number he's asking for... His requests started before yesterday so why was it so important before then ???...He makes up a problem otherwise why aren't violated citizens voicing their complaints at council meetings or in the press ???...Where are they ???


Billy and PIA are practically inseparable.


Shame he can't spend this much energy on the actual issues before the Council - so he can actually vote on them.


I dunno. I am a member of an association and I monitor the board of directors very closely. I pick up on things that are not right and unethical, that no one else notices. I'm not fan of Shreeves. But I'll reserve judgement, you never know, he may be onto something.

I find the duty descriptions interesting. It says the council shall act as a body. It says the county executive should cooperate with requests from the council. But.......Billy alone is not a majority body. So, the council really doesn't need to honor his request(s). Or am I wrong?


My interpretation would be you are right, Kelly.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.