Congressional map

A Maryland legal case challenges the redrawing of a single federal district, the 6th, to favor Democrats. Frederick County is divided between Maryland’s 6th and 8th congressional districts.

ANNAPOLIS — Maryland’s top legislators could testify as soon as May in the federal court case challenging Maryland’s congressional district boundaries.

A three-judge panel this week affirmed an earlier opinion by one of the panel’s judges that House Speaker Michael Busch and Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr., along with other Democratic lawmakers and state officials, could be called for depositions in the case.

The Frederick County plaintiffs argue that the state is unconstitutionally gerrymandered to stifle Republican voters in western Maryland’s 6th District.

In seeking evidence in the case, the plaintiffs served notices of deposition and subpoenas on the four Democratic members of the Governor’s Redistricting Advisory Committee, which worked on the state’s decennial mapping process. Those members included Miller and Busch.

Notices were also sent to Sens. Richard S. Madaleno Jr., D-Montgomery, and C. Anthony Muse, D-Prince George’s County, and Delegate Curt S. Anderson, D-Baltimore City.

Represented by the Office of the Attorney General, the members of the advisory committee and the lawmakers argued that they could not be compelled to testify in depositions or produce documents because of legislative privilege.

Miller, Busch and Madaleno produced fewer than 150 pages of evidence in the case, according to court records, and asserted state legislative privilege in withholding 36 responsive documents.

While the court ruled that the plaintiffs can move forward with depositions, the judges directed both sides to accommodate the schedules of Miller and Busch and postpone their depositions until after the end of the General Assembly session, but no later than May 1.

The case moves forward as redistricting reform bills put forward by Republicans and Democrats alike remain pending in the 2017 General Assembly session. As of Thursday afternoon, committees hadn’t taken action on any of the measures, including one put forward by Gov. Larry Hogan (R).

“There can be no possible excuse for keeping the nonpartisan redistricting reform bill hidden in a drawer once again. ... It’s time for legislators to join with us and set an example for the entire nation,” Hogan said at an afternoon press conference.

In the court case, former Gov. Martin O’Malley (D) has also sought to avoid a deposition, asserting executive privilege.

A status report on evidence gathering in the case is due to the court later this month.

Follow Danielle E. Gaines on Twitter: @danielleegaines.

Danielle E. Gaines covers politics and government in Frederick County, splitting her time between Winchester Hall and The State House. Having grown up in Illinois, she lived in New York and California before settling in Maryland.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.