Early Monday, Donald Trump tweeted: “94% Approval Rating in the Republican Party, a record. Thank you!”

Where the president got this specific number remains a mystery. Recent polls by YouGov put his GOP approval roughly 10 points lower, and Gallup, which has tracked Trump’s popularity since he took office, puts him at 88 percent.

But I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised that Trump used his Sharpie to round up his score. He’s deeply invested in being — or at least claiming to be — the most popular Republican president in history. In July 2018, he announced: “I am the most popular person in the history” of the GOP. “Beating Lincoln,” Trump added. “I beat our Honest Abe.”

For what it’s worth, polling in the 1860s wasn’t exactly reliable. But even if Trump’s oft-repeated 94 percent number were accurate, and even if it beat Lincoln’s ratings, it still wouldn’t beat George W. Bush’s 99 percent after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Why the president feels the need to embellish is already a well-spelunked psychological rabbit hole. But even ignoring his exaggerations, he is consistently hitting in the mid- to high 80s with Republicans in polling, which demands a question: Why are his actual numbers so high?

George W. Bush’s 99 percent might offer some insight. Americans generally rally around a president during a war or national crisis. But members of the president’s own party in particular can be counted on to fall in line.

The Atlantic’s Ronald Brownstein argues that the key to understanding the president’s standing with Republicans is that Trump is behaving like a wartime president, but the enemy is “Blue America.” Trump’s almost daily references to “treason” and enemies of the people may be driven by his own narcissism and persecution complex, but they resonate with a share of the electorate that believes the cultural war really is tantamount to a cold civil war.

While Trump has made it worse, this dynamic is not new. He is more the beneficiary (and exacerbator) of the polarized landscape than the creator of it. Party identification has been declining for Democrats and Republicans alike, but for those who cling to the label, the label has more meaning than it used to.

Until around 2000, it was normal for self-identified Republicans and Democrats to criticize presidents of their own parties, because people didn’t cling to partisan identity nearly as fiercely. The Bill Clinton impeachment battle was a foretaste of where we are. But even during the polarized presidency of George W. Bush, partisan dissent and defections were fairly common. Existential partisanship intensified under Barack Obama’s presidency, on both the right and left.

The wartime atmosphere Trump has established encourages partisans to overlook faults with their own side more than ever, because in the zero-sum logic of war, any dissent is seen as providing aid and comfort to enemies who would be worse if they gained power. Perhaps counterintuitively, Trump’s myriad and manifest flaws actually intensify the effect. The need to justify your support makes it impossible to acknowledge any shortcomings at all. When Stuart Varney of Fox Business recently refused to admit that Trump ever lies, it was as if he understood that once you pull that thread a little, there’s no telling where the unraveling will stop.

The irony is that the need to provide unwavering support for the president of your party is a direct function of the unwavering hostility from the president’s critics. This is why polls may not be as reflective of reality as we often think. If you talk to pollsters, they will tell you that many voters understand how polls can be used as weapons and don’t want to give the “enemy” any satisfaction.

Indeed, as I’ve argued before, there’s a rough parallel with Republican support for Bush during the Iraq War. Many Republicans knew that the war wasn’t going well but nonetheless supported Bush because he was a wartime president and they loathed his critics more than they disapproved of his performance. They’d be damned if they were going to give some pollster ammunition against the commander in chief. A similar dynamic explains Obama’s rock-solid support among Democrats. They hated — or feared — Obama’s enemies too much to abandon him, even if they had misgivings about him.

Both examples may shed some light on what’s in store for Trump in the future. Support for Bush and the war alike started to plummet as he headed for the exit. One of the defining currents of the Democratic primaries is the base’s disappointment with Obama’s accomplishments, even as his personal approval remains high.

It may be that once Trump is no longer the commander in chief in the war against Blue America, the ardor of his troops will give way to a better understanding of the price the GOP paid on his watch.

(Jonah Goldberg’s latest book, “Suicide of the West,” is now available wherever books are sold. You can write to him in care of this newspaper or by e-mail at goldbergcolumn@gmail.com, or via Twitter @JonahNRO.)

(12) comments


I too, sense a "cold civil war" and date it back to events in 1968. I was a university student finishing up my degree which was interrupted by a year with the Infantry in Vietnam and two years of training and stateside service. The Democratic convention in Chicago saw the left battle Hubert Humphrey and do their best to get Nixon elected. They expected a revolution to put them in power. Never happened. But the scars are still evident. The Democrats never recovered the edge in military and foreign relations. Not as if 1968 had no happened and later on 1975 - when I was in Vietnam until April. We stil remember losing. And we still fight a cold civil war.


Recent polls show a significant shift in party affiliation, mostly a negative for Republicans because of white women in the suburbs, especially those with a higher education.


I strongly suspect that a significant percentage of Republicans who have been identified as “supporters” of the president are, in reality, merely tolerant of him. As the Democratic Party moves farther and farther to the left, Trump Tolerance of Republicans as well as independents expands proportionately. The 2020 election is the Democrats to lose and, true to form, they are working feverishly to do so.


I agree, the 2020 election is the Democrats to lose. Trump has no merits. It would be a horrible reflection on America for Trump to be reelected. I hope not. Agree?


So far veritas, the Democratic Party has moved as far Left as Joe Biden and Nancy Palosi. If you can point to anything different, show your evidence. Peace.


Pelosi and Biden are old war horses in the process of being put out to pasture. It will be nothing short of a cosmic miracle if Uncle Joe doesn’t crash and burn well in advance of the Dem convention. The new, young blood of the party has all the energy and enthusiasm of the party and it pumps through a socialist heart. Since you demand evidence (from others, not yourself), I recommend reading some newspapers and watching some cable news. Even WaPo, CNN and MSDNC have acknowledged the obvious. Peace back atcha.


"For what it’s worth, polling in the 1860s wasn’t exactly reliable." This 'writer' can't really believe they are accurate now can he? He has to look no further than the 2016 General election for how "reliable" they truly are. I'll wait. The rest of his 'writing' is just his opinion. He should be elated that he actually gets a platform, albeit a small one, to put forth such "I hate Trump too" drivel.


No need to wait. The last-21-days polls in 2016 were pretty accurate. The actual national vote results were within the margins of error for 70% of the polls, which was actually better than the 2012 election.



He says Trump polls incredibly high, yet you put "writer" and "writing" in quotes and reference "hate" again and "opinion" as if something else is expected on an editorial page.


Trump has done well at acting the abuser. First, separate your victim(s) from everyone else - they are the enemy, not your friends; Second, isolate your victim(s) - I am the only one who can save you, or help you, or do anything at all; third, convince your victim(s) that they are nothing, that you are everything, and control their every thought and deed so you can keep them forever unable to think or do for themselves. Trump is well into step 3 with republicans.


"The need to justify your support makes it impossible to acknowledge any shortcomings at all." So this would be way too much to process when you could just shout HATE HATE HATE


Not all, Brook and that could easily cost Trump the next election.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.