Nothing gets you thinking like the birth of a child. In this case, my third grandson. That makes three kids under 3 years of age. I have seen how fast a family can grow. I look forward to the future and also reflect on the past. Next year there will be three toddlers and I know how fast a year can go by.

It’s been a little over 30 years since I graduated from high school and since that time, the population of the county has doubled to about 250,000, which is less than half that of the city of Baltimore, to give some perspective. And while Baltimore continues to lose residents, Frederick County shows no signs of doing the same.

Historically it took Frederick County 185 years to break the 100,000 mark but only about 25 years to double that number. Almost everywhere you go, you can see it. The aqua-colored pipes sticking up out of the ground in the middle of fields that once grew corn.

So how long till we hit half a million? Twenty years, 30 years or will the growth stall? As long as the federal government continues to pump money into the area, growth is almost a guarantee. And by the time we hit 500,000, we should be the same size as Baltimore if they continue to lose large chunks of their population.

Frederick has always been in the orbit of D.C. and the pull continues to get stronger with every year and every increase in budget. Drawing more people in from the county and as far away as Pennsylvania. The main artery being the U.S. 15/Interstate 270 corridor, which has been only two lanes each way since I can remember.

If we’re really planning for future growth, then we need to expand the infrastructure that leads to a better quality of life for the residents. What happens in times of natural disaster? A prolonged drought with an expanding population could pose a serious problem.

Should we actively limit growth in the future? What does the county look like with double the population? How long till we get there? Will there be enough public services for residents or will there be no safety net? Your guess is as good as mine.

The one thing I know is that growth has been a bipartisan issue. There are way more questions than answers, but the money is going to have to come from somewhere. If it’s for better roads, schools and services, then I don’t mind paying more.

If we don’t have a plan for expansion and one for contraction, then I wonder how prepared we are for the future. In my lifetime, the population has more than doubled and the number of people who flow through the county on their way to work, my guess would be much more.

They say the best way to predict the future is to look at what has happened in the past. We can guide the growth or be ruined by it. And I’m not so sure that’s even possible. The history of the Mayans should serve as a warning. We may only have the illusion that we have any control over our surroundings.

John Jacobs is a lifelong resident of Frederick County.

(3) comments


The entire column misses the adverse impact of roughly 7.8 billion people on this planet are having. No, growth which includes population growth is not good it is harmful. Economic growth (that doesn't cause human health or environmental harm) without population growth is the only good growth. The writer needs to be less narrow minded and looking longer term. Many of those immigrants coming in are now having a greater adverse impact on the planet than staying in their original country, so again greater immigration is not necessarily good. To reduce population growth start by reducing the incentives to have children (i.e. income tax deductions and credits).


Mr. Jacobs, Your last line holds more truth than any I have seen written in the columns lately:" "We may only have the illusion that we have any control over our surroundings." Ain't that the gospel truth.


One way to control growth is to make it illegal for political donations from the large developers to anyone running for office. That is where Blain got most of his money from and he sold us out...Another way is to quit issuing building permits for large codominiums (the ones that look like chicken coops). This will drive up the cost, as single family homes with land are more expensive. A third way is to raise the fees for developers, so they have to pay the full çosts of new schools, roads and other infrastructure.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.