As President Joe Biden and his top cybersecurity minds convened in the Situation Room Wednesday, their agenda was all about somehow outsmarting cybercriminal minds — and their powerful protector — in Vladimir Putin’s Russia.

Most assumed their top problem was the week’s new cyber ransomware holdup by Russia-based criminals of 1,500 Western companies that ran supermarkets, pharmacies and even railroads in the United States, Europe and Asia. But no. The same Russia-based cybercriminals, who are called REvil (a cyber shorthand for “ransom evil”) had just brazenly struck again, that very day. They had just targeted and posted on their website — which has an in-your-face name of “The Happy Blog” — documents from a Florida contractor with the high-tech name of HX5 that provides technology for space launches and weaponry to the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force and NASA. Not to shut them all down; just to show they could.

And you can be sure that none of the cyber masterminds in the Situation Room — not even their commander in chief (who may have been the only one at the table old enough to remember) — were thinking about the one pre-Computer Age crime-fighting solution to their problem. It was, after all, something their White House predecessors’ generations ago were taught by America’s first famous crime-fighter: the otherwise un-admirable J. Edgar Hoover.

In 1934, the new FBI’s first director saw that Chicago’s crime commission got a world of attention by simply labeling Al Capone “a public enemy.” Hoover, never one to be outdone in self-promotion, created a list of the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted Fugitives — and called bank robber John Dillinger “Public Enemy No. 1.” Suddenly America was fixated on this Public Enemy. Dillinger was spotted, shot and killed. His successors (“Baby Face” Nelson, “Pretty Boy” Floyd, “Machine Gun” Kelly and of course Bonnie and Clyde) came to similar fates. Soon Americans were gathering around their parlor radios, listening to a new CBS Radio top-rated show: “The FBI in Peace and War.”

Today our cyber world is both at peace and at war. U.S. intelligence has concluded that Putin ordered the cyber sabotage attacks on America’s democracy to help elect and unsuccessfully attempt to reelect Donald Trump, whom he somehow could always control. Today many experts inside and outside U.S. intelligence believe Putin can also control Russia’s underworld cybercriminals — if he ultimately wants to. But how to make that happen?

In their Geneva summit, Biden firmly warned Putin that there were 16 cyber targets that could not be touched without major retaliation — and gave Russia’s president that red-line list. That got Putin’s attention. The two presidents agreed to set up subsequent meetings of top cyber officials who would discuss ways of combating the cybercriminals. Biden is also reportedly working with U.S. allies around the world to achieve a unified battle-plan on defeating Russian and other cybercriminal ransom attacks.

Here’s where the Biden Situation Room brain trust ought to rethink and recalibrate Hoover’s Public Enemy No. 1. All who are farsighted can clearly see that ahead of us — and rushing toward us — is a fate we cannot allow to happen: a potential cybercriminal paralysis. It can take many forms; they range from dreadful to worse. Automakers are planning for an all-electric future. General Motors’ goal is to end production of gas and diesel cars by 2035. A world where cybercriminals can shut down a nation’s electrical grid — bringing a region or even a nation to a standstill must be prevented.

Coincidentally, shortly after that Situation Room national security cyber briefing, one of those U.S. and Russian cyber expert meetings was conducted. It is unclear if any progress was achieved. Especially, it is unclear whether enough progress will ever be achieved without an additional incentive. So here is one:

Putin must understand that from this point on, the cybercrimes must stop. Yet he must also understand that Putin and Russia can be a welcome part of the global solution. And that good relations can happen, if that happens.

But Putin must also be told, firmly but privately, that — as a last resort — a world of major allies are prepared to spotlight him and Russia as THE problem. He must be told that the United States. Britain, the European Union, Japan, Australia and more are prepared to declare Putin’s Russia Global Cyber-Enemy No. 1 — and make it stick.

Putin will get it: Russia’s global trade and global capital sources will suddenly be shutting down. But he must also know that dire option need not be. Our world will be better with Putin’s Russia as a major partner in our solution to end cybercrime.

Our world will be better off with no person, and no nation, being Global Enemy No. 1.

(1) comment

barrykissin

Russia-gate was a fraud. This column perpetuates the fraud. There is zero evidence the Russian government has anything to do with recent cybercrime. We do not want to further demonize Russia (or Iran). This is unwarranted and dangerous to human survival. Its purpose is to aggressively assert American Empire against all limitations and to justify the astronomical sums we spend on war and weapons. "U.S. intelligence has concluded that Putin ordered the cyber sabotage attacks on America’s democracy to help elect and unsuccessfully attempt to reelect Donald Trump, whom he somehow could always control." This is plainly false in many respects. Regarding the 2016 election, Hillary touted that all of our 17 intelligence agencies concluded with “high confidence” that the Russians meddled in our election for Trump’s benefit. False. The assessor was John Brennan, then spy-in-chief, who put together a secret panel of his choices from FBI, CIA and NSA in order to produce his miserable invention of the who, how and why the Russians did their dastardly meddling. Regarding 2020, "Russia failed to mount any major hacking or disinformation operations to interfere in the 2020 presidential election ... Russia experts say that despite the Kremlin’s preference for Trump, his presidency did not yield as many benefits for Putin as the Russian leader might have hoped. Sanctions were expanded ..." Nov 17, 2020, Washington Post, the newspaper that flogged Russia-gate for three whole years. And under Trump, we situated missiles on Russia's western border that can reach Moscow in 7 minutes. Brilliant!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Already a member?

Login Now
Click Here!

Currently a News-Post subscriber?

Activate your membership at no additional charge.
Click Here!

Need more information?

Learn about the benefits of membership.
Click Here!

Ready to join?

Choose the membership plan that fits your needs.
Click Here!