Does anyone know that Vice President Kamala Harris canceled plans to campaign for Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, in a bruising recall election?

Perhaps a telling move, from one Californian to another.

Harris was meant to help the governor in an hour of need. But she’s shaky too and may have little political capital to lend Newsom. Newsom faces voters on Sept. 14 in a blue state where Republicans are on a tear.

This broken plan got lost in the fog of war in Kabul and the epic storm that darkened New Orleans. No reason was given. The rally has not been rescheduled.

Harris and Newsom, in their 50s, are telegenic friends and pragmatists who know the special election is national in scope.

If Larry Elder, the leading Republican, becomes governor and if California Democrat Dianne Feinstein, 88, has to leave her Senate seat, Elder would name the new senator and tip the Senate to a Republican majority.

The curious incident got me thinking about Harris. Her portfolios, a voting rights bill and the southern border with Mexico, have not moved forward.

The vice president requested to work on voting rights. But she did not show up to speak at Saturday’s voting rights march in Washington to align with a growing grassroots movement.

Actually, Harris has not received rave reviews on the new job in Washington. Admittedly, it’s a tough crowd. Some note her 2020 presidential campaign tanked before Iowa.

Harris was just not ready to run, unlike another Black freshman senator in 2008.

How little we know her, the woman that would be president. She is not commanding her historic role nor taking our town by storm.

How little she shares. She speaks from the head, not the heart.

And her uproarious laughs have turned to gaffes, most recently with the tragedy unfolding in Afghanistan. These outbursts contrast with her usual prosecutor’s demeanor.

History’s odds are one in three that Harris will move into the White House someday. President Joe Biden spent eight years in the Naval Observatory (the vice president’s residence) on elegant Embassy Row.

Fifteen presidents served as vice presidents first.

The odds are higher for Harris, since Biden, 78, is the oldest president in American history. After long years, we the people have finally learned what a difference a good — or bad — president makes.

That also goes for vice presidents. They should be carefully chosen. Dashing Aaron Burr was Thomas Jefferson’s vice president. Many thought he’d make a swell president. Burr made men weep as a gifted orator, which Jefferson was not.

Abraham Lincoln’s worst mistake was choosing a racist Southern tailor-by-trade, Andrew Johnson, as his vice president.

On a cruel April night in 1865, Johnson became president with a single shot fired in a crowded theater. Johnson was a roaring drunk. Worse, he undercut Lincoln’s Civil War legacy and reinstated Confederate leaders to power.

Teddy Roosevelt and Harry Truman were the best in show.

In 1901, after a yawning procession of presidents, President McKinley was shot. His ebullient vice president, young Roosevelt, took office without missing a heartbeat.

A visionary builder, naturalist and optimist, Roosevelt modeled the American spirit and stayed in office until 1909.

Truman was second only to popular “Teddy,” whose nephew, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, hardly said a word to his vice president, a former Missouri senator, in the World War II endgame.

But hardheaded Truman knew what to do when Roosevelt died in April 1945. Blessed with a barrel of common sense and a keen grasp of history, Truman integrated the military — his greatest act.

Lyndon Johnson was sworn in as the nation wept over John F. Kennedy’s murder. A tragic figure, great on advancing civil rights at home and flawed in relentless pursuit of the Vietnam War. Previously, as majority leader, he was known as “Master of the Senate.”

This circles back to Harris. Truman, Johnson and Biden himself were consequential, established senators before becoming vice presidents.

The Senate is the battleground of the Biden presidency.

Harris’s time is best spent buttressing a bridge to the chamber, forming deeper friendships, coalitions and strategies in the place she thought she left behind.

Jamie Stiehm may be reached at

(5) comments


This is a very unprofessional hit peace, serving to only belittle the VP. Because she is female? what us this fellow's objective? Why was this published

in a newspaper?


She's doing at least as good of a job as Pence ever did.


You really can't blame Harris. She is doing the best job that she is capable of.


What? Kamala Harris will campaign with California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday, that’s tomorrow! Sounds like this syndicated columnist isn’t quite in touch with what’s happening around town.



That's because this entire article was a hit job from the first paragraph.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Already a member?

Login Now
Click Here!

Currently a News-Post subscriber?

Activate your membership at no additional charge.
Click Here!

Need more information?

Learn about the benefits of membership.
Click Here!

Ready to join?

Choose the membership plan that fits your needs.
Click Here!