On Oct. 26, 2001, Congress passed the U.S. PATRIOT Act. As a member of the U.S. Senate at the time, I cast the lone vote against it.

Twenty years of hindsight confirm that expanded government surveillance comes at a steep price for civil rights, our democratic legitimacy and marginalized populations. Congress has a unique opportunity to begin the deconstruction of the surveillance state. It should seize it.

The PATRIOT Act accelerated the nation’s move toward a surveillance state like adding fuel to fire. It was passed by Congress within weeks of the 9/11 attacks without adequate time to fully comprehend its sweeping ramifications.

The act authorized widespread wiretapping and expanded the scope of search warrants and subpoenas. Suddenly, the government had ample access to our private communication and information.

As I feared, the power granted by the PATRIOT Act has not been used exclusively, or even primarily, for counterterrorism. Instead, the act’s provisions have been employed in the so-called war on drugs and against political activists. And, as history foreshadowed, communities of color have been disproportionately targeted by government surveillance.

The PATRIOT Act also represented a seismic shift in our democracy’s checks and balances, to the benefit of the executive branch. I have written before about how Congress ceded its national security responsibilities after 9/11. Just as alarming is how the PATRIOT Act hamstrung our judicial branch.

For example, Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act expanded the government’s ability to access personal records held by third parties, including doctors, librarians and internet service providers. And while a judge must certify that the government has met the statute’s broad criteria, the government does not have to show any evidence to back up its claim. Instead, the judiciary must trust the government at its word.

As a result, courts have too often been bystanders to the use of the PATRIOT Act and its replacement, the USA Freedom Act — rather than being meaningful participants actively involved in determining its scope and constitutionality.

A key step to dismantling the surveillance state and to restoring civil liberties in this country is reinstating judicial oversight. Our judicial system exists in no small part to protect civil rights and liberties and to check the power of the other two branches of government. We must restore our courts’ ability to restrain the surveillance state.

Only a few years ago, the Supreme Court took an important step to reign in surveillance when, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts that Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan joined, the court held in Carpenter v. United States that the government violated the Fourth Amendment when it seized cell phone records without a warrant.

Although unrelated to the PATRIOT Act or the USA Freedom Act, Carpenter was a landmark privacy decision. But its future, and that of other important privacy protection precedents, is now in the hands of a Supreme Court packed with conservative judicial ideologues.

The Supreme Court’s super-conservative majority is already delivering wins for the right by upholding voter suppression laws, diluting the separation of church and state, and stripping pregnant people in Texas of access to safe and legal abortion. The court’s blatant disregard for precedent in recent cases makes it difficult to assess whether Carpenter’s privacy protections will last.

This underscores the need for Congress to act. The House’s and Senate’s inability to reach agreement last year on key portions of the USA Freedom Act presents an opportunity to rein in the surveillance state — an opportunity that could be pursued in tandem with Supreme Court reform.

Twenty years after the passage of the PATRIOT Act, Congress cannot begin the necessary process of dismantling the surveillance state fast enough.

Russ Feingold, a member of the U.S. Senate from 1993 to 2011, is president of the American Constitution Society, a progressive legal organization.

(7) comments


You gotta love the lefties when they utter absurdities such as Feingold's quote above "... stripping pregnant people in Texas of access to safe and legal abortion." Come on, man! Follow the science! [beam]


If I were you I would switch to Maxwell House decaf? Oh and no coffee after 12 noon, it messes with your sleep…


Actually Russ, the DoJ has NOT been hamstrung one bit; in fact it is running wild in the WRONG direction...and now Biden wants to add 85,000 more snoops to the IRS so they can watch every financial move the citizens make....and the cost is only $80 Billion of our tax money....or if you believe biden , the cost is zero....

Russ Feingold, a member of the U.S. Senate from 1993 to 2011, is president of the American Constitution Society, a progressive legal organization....also the only lawmaker who voted against it in the Senate .....

Most American's are unaware of the ramifications the Patriot Act has on their lives nor do they seem to care? I mean if they really understood the impact the last thing anyone would have in their homes would be an Alexa, or a doorbell camera or anything that surveils them inside their own private residence? We close the drapes and lock our doors to keep prying eyes out but yet....we are allowing the government to...

Surveil your emails and internet traffic without your consent (216).

Label you a terrorist if you belong to an activist group (411).

Confiscate your property without a hearing (806).

Put immigrants in jail indefinitely and without proof they are guilty of a crime (412).

Search your home without telling you (213).

Demand your info from telecommunication companies and block them from informing you (505).

Hand the CIA private information on innocent citizens (203 & 901).

The Patriot Act has proven to be one of the biggest threats to the privacy of US citizens over the past two decades. Despite starting life as a response to a horrific terrorist atrocity couched in the desire to protect, the provisions have fundamentally changed American citizens' attitudes to government surveillance as well as their own personal privacy.



Feingold's a very rare bird - a true American patriot who embodies classical liberalism.


The patriot act did significant damage to the American way of life. I can't help but think that the masterminds of the 9/11 attack would be very pleased at how much American freedoms have been willingly surrendered as a direct response to their actions.

And we keep surrendering our freedoms without even thinking about it, I think that was the plan?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Already a member?

Login Now
Click Here!

Currently a News-Post subscriber?

Activate your membership at no additional charge.
Click Here!

Need more information?

Learn about the benefits of membership.
Click Here!

Ready to join?

Choose the membership plan that fits your needs.
Click Here!