Nationalism has a bad name. For many Americans, mention of the word summons up visions of Hitler and Nazism. Some condemn nationalism as thoughtless bragging that your nation is better than others, which should be discouraged just as second-graders are told not to brag, lest they hurt classmates’ feelings.

Historical and international perspective is supplied by one of the conveners of the well-attended National Conservatism conference in Washington last month, Israeli think tank head Yoram Hazony, in his 2018 book, “The Virtue of Nationalism.” Hazony argues that nationalism first emerged in the northwest corner of Europe, in Tudor England and in the Dutch republic rebelling against the overlordship of the king of Spain. These were small maritime nations, growing rich through international trade even while threatened by massive monarchies. In the years of religious wars, they were the most religiously diverse and tolerant polities in Christendom.

Hazony contrasts nationalist states with what he calls imperialist polities, which include international organizations such as the United Nations and political entities such as the Holy Roman Empire, the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, which was not just trying to govern Germany but to conquer “untermensch” peoples. As an Israeli, he is very much aware that his successful nationalist state is under constant attack from such imperialist bodies.

Nationalist states, he argues, can provide peaceful havens for those of differing cultural views and economic interests who share a common citizenship. They will, he argues, protect their individual liberties and (here some readers will disagree) abjure external conquests. “The best political order that is known to us,” he writes, “is an order of independent national states.”

This is congruent with the words of two of President Trump’s thoughtful speeches, delivered in Warsaw, Poland, in July 2017 and in Normandy on D-Day this year. In them he pays generous tribute to other nations’ nationalism and how they have advanced human liberty. It is also congruent with the rhetoric of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson as he tries to give effect to British voters’ decision to leave what, in Hazony’s terminology, is an increasingly imperialistic European Union.

Hazony seems to me on solid ground in arguing that nationalism, rightly understood, can be a force for good. Trump’s words on D-Day, and those of presidents before him on earlier anniversaries, should remind us that the Allies who cooperated in that enterprise were all led by nationalists — America’s Franklin Roosevelt; Britain’s Winston Churchill; France’s Charles de Gaulle; and the leaders of Canada, Poland, Norway and Australia.

One might add that an ally left unmentioned, the Soviet dictator Josef Stalin, temporarily portrayed himself as a nationalist rather than a communist to rally his people to fight on the Eastern Front even as democratic nationalists worked together to open the front on the West.

The nationalist sensibility is an important part of domestic partisan politics. In an article I wrote for The Public Interest in 1993, I argued that the political parties and political leaders of Western democracies partake, in varying proportions, in four different dispositions — religious, socialist, liberal and nationalist.

Each has its strengths and weaknesses. Religious parties come to grief when people abandon religion (like the Christian Democrats in largely secular Western Europe), and they struggle to amass majorities in religiously diverse nations like the United States.

Socialist parties’ weakness is that socialism just doesn’t work. When that became apparent in Britain, Margaret Thatcher controversially rolled back postwar Labour Party policies in the 1980s. More quietly, Scandinavian nations rolled back their welfare states in the 1990s. Now venerable social democratic parties have all but disappeared in Germany, France and Italy.

Liberal parties — liberal in the 19th-century sense: secular and free market — have sometimes governed effectively but proved incapable of defending themselves against destruction. Britain’s Liberals, dominant in 1916, were ground to bits between the Conservatives and Labour in 1924. The dominant secular party in Italy was swept from power by Mussolini’s brownshirts in 1922, and the one in France by Hitler’s troops in 1940.

Only parties with a strong nationalist strain have proved to be lasting — including, over most of their histories, America’s Democratic and Republican parties. Today we’re told that Donald Trump’s Republicans are dangerously and self-destructively nationalist. Headline speakers at Hazony’s conference — tech mogul Peter Thiel, Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, national security adviser John Bolton, Sen. Josh Hawley — seemed to disagree. And many observers are wondering whether Democratic presidential candidates’ enthusiasm for open borders is a politically hazardous trashing of a sensible nationalism long essential for political success.

Michael Barone is a senior political analyst for the Washington Examiner, resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and longtime co-author of The Almanac of American Politics.

(16) comments

FCPS-Principal

Silly article. Even Hitler's Nazi state provided a "peaceful havens for those of differing cultural views and economic interests who share a common citizenship." If you were German, things were good. Up to a point of course.

gary4books

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation_state#Before_the_nation_state

gary4books

The Nation State came abut after the empires and other monarchies in the 18th Century and is a new invention. I had just as soon see it fade away. But this discussion mixed and morphs concepts of liberal governance to the point that Harzony might not recognize his writing or thoughts. Certainly, I can not agree with the conclusions. Unlimited nationalism can lead to a nuclear war.

DickD

Nationalism can be good or bad. Always take care of your own first, but do not do it at the expense of neighboring countries and do not attack them, make trade difficult or impossible. Diplomacy is the key, which is sadly lacking currently in the U.S.

rikkitikkitavvi

Dick, I agree with your first sentence. I also agree with your second sentence up to the well placed comma. After that, well, you went, in my opinion, off the rails. Why should their expense become our expense at the cost of not taking care of our own? Yes, Diplomacy worked very well under the last administration when he went on his "apology tour" Many people, including myself, gave that president eight very long years to take care of our own. He failed. Bigly! Now we have a President who is using a hard line diplomacy effort against country's across the globe to take care of our own. In other words, MAGA. I'm willing to give this President the same eight years that I gave the past one. Why are you and your fellow part-time (when it suits you) Nationalists not?

rcfoster

White Nationalism was only brought up after President Trump used the word Nationalism and the media decided that it was the same as White Supremacy. It's not at all and there is no specific 'white' nationalism category. It's just nationalism. This country is the greatest on the planet and we should all be proud of it.

phydeaux994

I can’t remember, when was the last time our Southern Border was closed? Or our Northern or Eastern or Western Borders. I know that on January 19, 2017 the number of illegal crossings were at a 20 year low, more illegal aliens had been leaving than were coming across during the Obama Administration. In fact the Border had been pretty stable until January of this year. And since then, BAM, HUMANITARIAN CRISIS. What the heck caused that???

DickD

Trump!

hayduke2

Spot on ! Trump and his rhetoric...

rikkitikkitavvi

You mean Trump and his Nationalism don't you?

rikkitikkitavvi

The illegals heard that the new and improved President Trump was going to shut it down so they had to run for the border. Ergo, Invasion USA.

gary4books

Rather one can say we cut all aid to Central America and those programs ollapsed and set waves of refugees. On purpose or not, it precipated a disaster.

rbtdt5

Speaking of racists, what ever happened to our resident racist Vic Davy?

BunnyLou

He has morphed into the “Russian”... Very sinister.

Thewheelone

Good call, Bunny. It is nice to agree with you for a change!!!

Thewheelone

See, we cal ALL get along!

[smile]

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.