Pit a bulldozer against a tree and the tree rarely wins. But for four years, fiscal 2007 to 2011, Frederick County found a way to stem the loss of forests to new development: insist that an acre be planted for every acre cut down.

It was a sensible move that saved county residents money and protected local rivers and creeks.

Forests are natural sponges. A forest soaks up tens of thousands of gallons of water during a rain storm, and thousands of tons of carbon dioxide from the air.

Without forests, runoff from storms flows into and pollutes local streams. We expect Frederick realized how expensive it is to fix that problem. It made sense not to lose any more forests than necessary.

What if forests were cut down and taxpayers had to pay to plant rain gardens and other devices to soak up the runoff forests used to hold? How much would that cost? A 2015 study by the Low Impact Development Center in Beltsville concluded that Prince George’s forest reduces polluted runoff by 4.3 billion gallons a year in the county, a service worth $12.8 billion annually.

Frederick County has more forest than Prince George’s. So the benefits could be worth even more.

Frederick County’s 2007 action set standards higher than minimal state requirements for how much builders have to replant if they cut down forest on a development site. The state Forest Conservation Act requires builders only to replant one acre for every four cut down. Frederick’s ordinance required one acre replanted for one acre cleared.

The results were immediate. While other counties continued to lose forests at alarming rates, Frederick actually planted more acres of forest — 424 acres — than developers cut down from 2008 to 2011.

Save forests. Save money. And protect clean water and air.

Then, suddenly in 2011 the next Board of Commissioners repealed the replanting ordinance. Since that repeal, forest loss in Frederick County has increased, according to annual reports the county submits to the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, although other aspects of the county’s FCA program have encouraged a relatively high replanting rate.

Now, only neighboring Carroll County has the one-to-one replanting requirement. Not surprisingly, Carroll is the only county where forests are actually increasing, according to the DNR data.

The Chesapeake Bay Foundation believes this is unfortunate. Thankfully, legislation in the Maryland General Assembly this session, (SB 365 / HB 599), offers a solution. It would strengthen the FCA by requiring one-for-one replanting across the state. The bill effectively mimics what Frederick County successfully did locally in 2007 — before the repeal.

The state legislation also would give counties the option to charge a builder more who wants to clear more forest and not replant. Currently, developers often avoid replanting by paying a small fee that doesn’t always cover the cost of replacement.

Frederick County Senator Ron Young is the lead sponsor in the Senate. We urge all Frederick County residents who value trees to support these bills.

Erik Fisher is the Maryland assistant director and land use planner for the Chesapeake Bay Foundation.

(7) comments


Is anyone tracking how many trees were planted anywhere after all these housing developments were built? When we first moved to Urbana we could hear the Owls every warm morning, but now that more trees are gone, the owls are gone too. DNR doesn't seem to care about this and isn't tracking the trees or the Owls.


It makes sense to replace trees in the forest, in residential communities there are usually more trees after homes are built than before, except for apartment and condominium buildings. The lot we built our home on had no trees and the top soil had been robbed to sell elsewhere. We have put in many trees and they look very nice. But there are some that do not even put any bushes in, just a complete failure on landscaping.


Thank you for this information Erik. The last BoCC was set on destroying Frederick County in their lust for development and political enrichment. They reduced all kinds of environmental and APFO standards so they could approve a massive pipeline of developments with almost no regard for their impact on the environment, schools or roads. It was all about them and the development crowd they sucked up to and took money from. It was disgusting.

I didn't know about the bills and look forward to reading them. One thing that just crossed my mind was regulating minimum tree canopy densities in future developments. I don't know what that may be, but we need to start taking a 180 degree approach from old development practices. What we've been doing is not sustainable. Reforestation will help establish micro climates that will balance out some of these wild temperature fluctuations which seem to be the norm these days. Most of us live and work in artificial environments, detached from nature. Its not good for us and we should change our approach on how we develop to include more of it.

It's just gross to see these developments stripped clean of trees and topsoil and then run all over with heavy equipment that compacts the soil and it makes it hard to grow anything in your yard, and captures little runoff. And you're right, the storm water infrastructure we need to build to compensate for this is a hidden cost that no one sees.


Just one more piece of damage done by the last BOCC....


I'm glad to have had a hand in the 2007 amendments to the County's Forest Resource Ordinance ("FRO"). Unless they've done so recently, the current County Council has not shown any interest in reinstating the FRO provisions repealed by the 2010-2014 Young Board of County Commissioners.


Thank you for the foresight....


Thanks for what you did commissioner. The environment is such an afterthought in politics. But I have a feeling we're fast approaching a time that we'll be forced to address it.

You know we're in an official drought right now. Just to the south of us is in a severe drought. Saw it on Fox 5 weather this morning.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.