The evidence continues to pile up about the terrible toll that distracted driving is taking on our nation.

A new report by the American Public Health Association counts close to 78,000 people who have died in crashes caused by distracted driving since 2000. That is an average of almost 4,000 needless deaths every year.

Drivers have been distracted since the invention of the automobile — talking to passengers, adjusting the radio, trying to get the kids to stop fighting in the back seat.

But with the invention of the cellphone, what had been a minor category among the causes of crashes has become a major problem, ranking right up there with speeding and drunken driving.

Everyone knows that using a cellphone while driving is very dangerous, but too many people still do it. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 481,000 drivers are using their cellphones during daylight hours.

The AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety determined that those who talk on a cellphone while driving are four times more likely to crash, and those who text and drive are up to eight times more likely to crash.

The National Transportation Safety Board recently put out its “Most Wanted List” of transportation safety improvements and said: “We believe distraction should be addressed through education, legislation, and enforcement.”

There is historical evidence that all three have been effective in addressing other safety problems. Drunken driving was significantly reduced by the education efforts from such organizations as Mothers Against Drunk Driving. Lawmakers imposed stricter limits on blood alcohol levels and harsher penalties. Police used aggressive enforcement, and the courts got tougher.

Driving drunk became socially less acceptable and much more expensive, and the levels declined, at least until the mid-1990s. It has unfortunately remained steady since then, but that just means we must renew our efforts.

A fourth hope for improvement lies with technological advances that are already being made. We are not talking about self-driving cars, which still seem a good way off as engineers seek to solve the most intransigent issues.

Simpler ideas are already being advanced by many inventors, including by a local high school student.

Amogh Kashyap, a rising freshman at Urbana High School, has designed a prototype of a camera that would track a teen driver’s attention by monitoring what direction he or she is facing. If the teen turns away for at least 2 seconds, the program would send a notification to their parents saying the driver is distracted. Since the device also beeps to warn drivers that they are not paying attention, it could be useful for adults as well.

Other innovations should also prove helpful. Apple’s CarPlay program, available on newer models, will read a text aloud to the driver, and allow him to dictate a reply without glancing away from the road.

The problem of distracted driving is so large and so complicated, no one solution will end it. We will need dozens and dozens of improvements in cars, and much more awareness on the part of drivers. We will need new laws, and we will need consistent enforcement.

But as any family member or friend of one of those 78,000 people killed by distracted driving in the last two decades could tell you, it is a problem that we must work aggressively to address, before tens of thousands more are killed.

(8) comments

rcfoster

While it's popular to blame cell phones, playing with the radio, eating, dropping something, kids fighting, putting on make up, and reading papers or books is another reason for accidents. That's why it's called 'distracted driving'. Cell phones are just a part of the problem.

hayduke2

Cell phones are a part of the problem - Agree but they are an increasing and BIG part of the problem.

FCPS-Principal

Drunk driving is the only activity I know of where you can be punished for harming nobody. It should be declared unconstitutional since it is a law that prescribes penalties, including imprisonment, based on what might happen rather than what actually happens, as is the case with all other criminal statutes. Why not fine and jail people for carrying a gun or a knife? They might harm somebody.

DickD

Because drinking and driving means you are not able to control your actions. With a knife and gun you can, unless drunk or mentally deranged.

FCPS-Principal

Drinking and driving does not mean that at all. Millions drink and drive with no events. No reason to charge them with any crime if they do so.

DickD

But the issue is DUI and that's a crime.

MD1756

There are many other issues that people can be punished for without harming anyone. One only has to look at Virginia for an example. If you drive 20+ mph over the speed limit (or over 80 mph on the highway) you have committed a misdemeanor violation which is punishable with fines, points on your license and even with jail time (I don't know if they've actually jailed anyone for it). If you go beyond driving violations, there are many more violations that don't end in actual harm to someone but are punishable with jail time.

Samanthapowers

Between capital punishment and heavy handed police tactics (check out the number of arrests for simple marijuana possession). VA really ain't for lovers.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.