After a year of study and $20,000 grant from the Chesapeake Bay Trust, the Center for Watershed Protection and Water Words that Work returned to Frederick last week with a report on ways to encourage dog owners to clean up after their pets.

Dog poop is a big, heaping problem, and our canine buddies are leaving an estimated 110,000 pounds of it around the city’s streets, sidewalks and yards, despite a citywide “Scoop the Poop” pledge, 38 waste stations, educational videos on YouTube and a downtown dog park. Researchers from the two clean-water organizations presented the mayor and Board of Aldermen with a multi-step process to encourage dog owners to pursue proper pet waste pickup and disposal.

While we concede that’s a hefty amount of dog waste to deal with, with more pressing city priorities for enforcement, we’re not sure the scope of the problem justifies the $28,800 price tag to launch the recommended programs.

It’s up to city officials to determine just how a serious the volume of undisposed dog waste is and, if so, how much attention it’s worth.

More so than the disgusting inconvenience of stepping in a load while strolling down the street, dog waste does affect the environment. As we mentioned when we editorialized on this a year ago, the Environmental Protection Agency estimates that two days of dog waste from 100 dogs would contribute enough pollution to close a beach and all watershed areas within 20 miles of it. Dog poop is loaded up with fecal coliform bacteria at twice the level of humans. Dog waste also has enough bacteria and viruses — including tapeworm, roundworm and E. coli, among others — that it can cause serious health issues in humans, according to the website One dog ejects 274 pounds of poop a year on average.

The clean-water groups’ research showed that an incentive-based program would be more effective than one based purely on enforcement, Neely Law, a senior research analyst for the Center for Watershed Protection, told city officials.

One of the recommendations, and we’re not making this up, is a “Clean Yards/Streets Challenge” that would pit neighborhoods in the city against one another in a competition. The winner would be determined by the number of pet waste pledges signed and pounds of pet waste collected within a designated period of time.

Research or not, we can’t believe anyone would actually take part. And we feel bad for the person who has to store the poop, not to mention the poor schlub who has to weigh it. Yuck.

We’re in favor of encouraging dog owners to take responsibility for what comes out the rear end of their pets, but we’re dubious that a poop collection competition and signed pledges are what’ll do it.

One problem with a pledge is that pet owners who are responsible and clean up after their animals are likely the ones who’ll sign. Those who are too lazy to pick up the poop either won’t sign or will and just carry on letting their dogs relieve themselves whenever and wherever, pledges be damned.

One of the study’s key findings was that, “A small number of repeat offenders may account for a majority of the pet waste in public areas.” The study also states that those dog owners who flout the rules are probably ones whose animals aren’t licensed.

If city leaders feel this is a compelling enough problem to engage, they need to hammer the offenders, and hammer them hard. Of course, one problem is catching those offenders in the act. So, when a dog owner doesn’t pick up, the commensurate fine should be stiff enough to ensure it doesn’t happen again. And make no mistake, word will get around.

Anyone caught letting their dogs “go” unrestricted should have to produce licensing documentation. If not, they should be fined and fined heavily. Last year, when the grant award was announced, we suggested the following: Boost the first-time offense fine from $25 to $100, the second offense from $50 to a fine of $250 and the third and subsequent offenses during a calendar year from $75 to $500.

If the pet is unlicensed, well, double that initial fine to $200 and require proof of licensure. That should get the poop scofflaws’ attention.

(10) comments


Modern biotechnology has greatly simplified and lowered the cost of solving this. Just DNA ID each dog's DNA as part of getting a dog license. The cost per sample is low enough now that this will not be a significant addition to the cost of owning a dog. When un-scooped poop is found collect a sample and ID the dog using a commercially available kit, then send the owner a ticket large enough to be a deterrent and cover the cost. This will miss a few out-of-town visitor's dogs and a few whose owners have not licensed them, but will ID almost all offenders. Knowing that they will certainly be caught will be a major deterrent to scofflaws. A side benefit will be to give County Animal Control a rough estimate of the fraction of dogs that are not licensed. This will eliminate most of the illegal dog dumping.


I truly believe that we shouldn't need a $28k study to tell us that we should be picking up our dog poop. It's common sense and if you can't do it then you shouldn't own a pet. What a sad society we have become if other's have to tell us the obvious.


Villages in India use the methane from fermenting cow dung to produce energy.


While we all realize this is a leigitimate concern, Some of us in the Hillcrest area are concerned about people using parks, streams and open sewars in the public eye as toilets. Yes, it is happening, drive by Home Depot and watch the folks looking for work use the creek. Home depot loves the fact they have folks hanging around looking for day work. These men are there all day long using your creek and bushes, while home depot has refused to maintain a toilet, but loves the fact contractors can hire the guys.
Then we have folks living in there cars parked along the Hillcrest area streets who we have seen " Deposits" of excrement and toilet paper droped on the sewar grates. So,, please, in the future, can you asses these needs also.


I Agree Home Depot should step upto the plate in one fashion or another....give them a portable potty or make them go away!


Why doesn't the city charge a fee for dogs and pets?? City hall will take meetings, studies, polls and etc. on this matter, and in the end do nothing.


Poop on the downtown streets may be bad, but how about those walking their dogs in the suburbs or those that simply put their dogs in the backyard, with an electric fence? Pets can be a real nuisance, if not properly cared for.


I agree, I live downtown and the smell can really be overwhelming. Please give ideas to people who own dogs as to how to manage the animals waste in the yard.


Walk by the port-o-potties at the Baker Park tennis courts. There's where the poop smell is 'overwhelming.'


Just think how the environment was affected back when the only mode of travel (other than walking) in Frederick was by horse. Where'd they put all that poop?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.