The General Assembly is dealing with a whole raft of bills aimed at reforming Maryland’s policing system, most of which were proposed in response to the Black Lives Matter protests last summer.

Everyone from the Speaker of the House of Delegates to the founders of Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream have been in the capital backing one idea or another.

House Speaker Adrienne A. Jones has offered a sweeping vision for the future of policing in the state, based on recommendations from a workgroup she created last summer. She has introduced an “omnibus” bill to implement changes ranging from requiring body cameras to repealing the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights.

Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, on the other hand, are traveling the country supporting bills to eliminate the practice of giving qualified immunity to law enforcement officers accused of misusing their powers.

While we support the general idea of police reform, since the need is real and urgent, we do have concerns about both the approaches of the speaker and the ice cream guys.

The Ben & Jerry’s founders, who are known for supporting progressive causes, came to Annapolis to back a bill introduced by Del. Jheanelle K. Wilkins (D-Montgomery).

Her bill would allow people who are harmed by police to pursue civil lawsuits against officers for physical and emotional damages, which is not allowed under current state law.

Police officers accused of criminal conduct should be vigorously investigated and prosecuted if evidence supports it. But opening the door to personal lawsuits is very different.

Police officers are not doctors who are paying for malpractice insurance. They are agents of the government, and if they are accused of wrongdoing short of criminal conduct, the government is the proper target of a lawsuit. The government then should decide on punishment of individual officers for such wrongdoing.

Our main issue with the reform package proposed by Speaker Jones is that omnibus bills too often have several popular ideas packaged with more controversial ones, in an effort to give a coalition of lawmakers some reason to support the overall package.

Recommendations from Jones’s workgroup include such worthwhile items as:

  • Creating a statewide police use-of-force statute;
  • Mandating independent investigations of use-of-force incidents;
  • Requiring mental health assessments of all police recruits before hiring and throughout their career;
  • Creating an early-warning system to identify officers with problematic behavior;
  • Creating a study to determine what emergency calls can be diverted from police agencies.

In general, we support rethinking the role of police in society, and recruiting the very best officers. We have many, many fine people who have devoted their careers to protecting society. We also have a few bad actors, and we need more tools to identify them and deal with them. Keep them off the force when possible and get rid of them promptly when necessary.

Diverting some emergency calls, especially those seeking help dealing with the mentally ill, away from police to specifically trained responders is another good move.

But the drawback to rolling everything into an omnibus bill is the inclusion of an important but divisive question like the police officers’ bill of rights. Reform advocates say current law keeps too many investigations shrouded in secrecy and grants protections to officers that are not available to others under investigation.

It is time to revisit the whole idea, to reconsider the pros and cons, and potentially to scrap it entirely. But including it in a larger bill risks dooming the entire package because police unions are likely to strongly oppose it.

The most important goal should be to rebuild the trust of the whole community in the police department. That is in the best interests of our many fine police officers, and it is also in the best interests of all citizens, especially minorities.

The actions of police across the country last summer, especially in the George Floyd case in Minneapolis, showed that the problems between police and minorities are real and very serious.

We hope that substantive reforms will be enacted during this session to begin the hard work of forging new, positive links between the police and the communities they serve. Particularly in the Black community, mistrust of the police is so widespread, destructive and corrosive.

The cries of pain and anger from last summer must continue to echo in the State House this session, reminding lawmakers about the need for real reform, right now.

(10) comments

Dwasserba

Ben & Jerry took a correspondence course on ice cream making from Penn State so everyone, listen up.

francesca_easa

Look at reforming laws. So many crooks get off too easily only to commit crimes again and again.

NewMarketParent

@francesca_easa

That's a separate problem and should be handled separately. Recidivism is largely a problem due to the fact that we don't reform prisoners and don't find them meaningful employment once out of the system. Different conversation.

KellyAlzan

Creepy spy Kelly “two words” Alzan

BornToHula2

[thumbup]

jsklinelga

The problem with an omnibus bill is very similar to the wide sweeping, knee jerk reactions to incidences of police misconduct.. It is political overreaction.

This is not the South in the 50's nor LA in the 30's. The world of policing in the US has changed dramatically in the last few decades..

Defund the police initiatives are as misguided as the modern liberal brainstorms trying to address climate change. Honest, realistic ongoing, level headed conversations are always the answer. Not the hyperbolic, political platform grandstanding , fueled by an algorithmic, profit based, social media, that has engulfed our country.

Flat out. I know I would not have the courage to be a police officer even in a quiet town like Brunswick. The thought of being a police officer in the inner cities is beyond comprehension. These folks are heroes. .

FrederickFan

Pay attention and focus on reality. There is no defund the police initiative. It's not mentioned in this article. There are good reforms under discussion to build trust in policing and weed out the bad actors. Long overdue.

jsklinelga

FF

I said similar to. Point being is over reaction. Hope you have a good Saturday. Chances are you feel safe and secure in your home or if you venture out. The police are constantly on duty to protect you.

bosco

In regards to knee jerk, over reaction, check with Minneapolis on the defund the police initiative. Crime is rising and it's affecting minorities the most. The lesson may be to be careful what you wish for because you may get it.

mattlemp

I agree totally. Police reform is much needed and long overdue.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Already a member?

Login Now
Click Here!

Currently a News-Post subscriber?

Activate your membership at no additional charge.
Click Here!

Need more information?

Learn about the benefits of membership.
Click Here!

Ready to join?

Choose the membership plan that fits your needs.
Click Here!