Potomac Edison has been found in violation of their responsibility to provide timely meter readings. The order stated in part, “I find it was the management of PE and PE’s implementation of the tariff that was the cause of the high level of missed reads.”

After the defeat of the unnecessary PATH transmission project in 2011, Sugarloaf Conservancy, in response to member complaints about Potomac Edison’s meter reading practices, filed a complaint with the Maryland Public Service Commission on May 19, 2012.

This complaint alleged that Potomac Edison neglected to follow the terms of their tariff, which required them to read meters on a bimonthly basis. In many instances, we found that meters were being read only four times a year. Most importantly, the estimates were inaccurate, which for some caused severe problems when billing adjustments were made after an actual read.

Without action by the PSC, with the PATH project terminated, Sugarloaf Conservancy disbanded in December 2012. To my surprise, the PSC issued an order on April 9, 2013, almost a year after the complaint was filed. It called for an investigation to be conducted into Potomac Edison’s meter reading frequency, estimation of bills, and compliance with its tariff in this proceeding.

The case was referred to a hearing examiner and the proceedings moved at a snail’s pace. Initially, procedural issues were addressed; then, after settlement discussions were conducted without success, followed by a failed mediation effort, the judge ordered the case to proceed.

The order requires Potomac Edison’s tariff to be modified and to require them to read meters every month instead of their current practice of bimonthly. Currently they are the only utility in Maryland reading meters bimonthly.

Potomac Edison is required to offer a payment plan to those customers who receive a substantially low estimated bill, followed by a substantial catch-up bill the following month. They are also required to modify their bill to clearly show when an estimate occurs and the reason for not actually reading the meter.

A limited financial penalty of $25,000 was ordered with a comment that “violations of a similar nature in the future will not be so leniently addressed.” The final order requires Potomac Edison to submit a monthly report for 24 months to ensure compliance with the revised tariff.

It is our hope Potomac Edison will not appeal this ruling and accept their obligation to provide their customers with accurate and timely reading for their electric usage.

As the saying goes, better later than never. While it took four years from the initial complaint filed to issuing a ruling, I am pleased the PSC commissioners recognized their obligation to the Maryland ratepayers. I also want to express my appreciation of the hard work by individuals who devoted their time and much effort throughout the PSC hearing process.

Doug Kaplan

writes from Frederick.

(7) comments

siddhiMae

Would the author of this article please contact me at the.siddhis@gmail.com

gary4books

I am supposed to have an average bill for both electricity and gas, but hey go up and down so often I wonder at the manner they use to calculate them. Estimated bills push me up over actual use and then they tell me I am over "average." Sure. Until they read the meter. Give me a few dollars each month and a day that is the same and I can do it for them.
I have.

KellyAlzan

I've been wondering why many months in a row only had "estimated" readings and not ACTUAL.

kwhite30

Mr Kaplan, thank you for the update. I've experienced those wild swings in monthly charges ever since I went with solar panels. Never understood why they could skip so many months of actual readings. Appreciate the info!

jerseygrl42

the reason for every other month readings is simply an attempt to control costs associated with that function which with monthly reading will now double and of course be passed along to the rate payers.....with so many tools available that could eliminate sending people out in vehicles to read meters why are we taking a step backwards ....while other options are reviewed, why not offer the public an opportunity to self read/report and for those who do, give them a couple of dollars off their bill and send a reader out quarterly to read/verify.....many years ago there was an experiment made with postal letter carriers that worked successfully with electronic devices that picked up a signal with the meter reading info.....wonder why that was never implemented ....

gary4books

[thumbup][thumbup]

DickD

Interesting. My own bill has varied considerable and they go by past records and average everything in their estimates. They make no allowance for all the extra insulation added to our home. They made no allowance for an electric car. And it does make me wonder if they even make a meter reading. Who really knows, without doing your own meter reading. The good part is eventually they have to get costs to even out and equal the meter reading. As our meter is in the house, they merely have to walk by and take a measurement from outside, it is not a lot of work or a lot of expense.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.