In his column of Sept. 27, Syed Wasimul Haque says that Pakistan was formed on the basis of religion, while “India declared itself secular with no affiliation to any religion.” In the same breath he says “Sadly, Hindu extremists now dominate the whole spectrum of daily living in India.”

Is he also sad because Pakistan has never been secular? Constitutionally, India remains a “secular, democratic republic.” Yes, BJP has gained political power to form a government at the national level and in different states. But “the whole spectrum of daily living” in India does not run according to its philosophy. Fifteen years ago the BJP government helped elect APJ Abdul Kalam, a Muslim, as India’s president. There are Hindus just like jihad Muslims and fundamentalist Christians who would like to see everyone converted to their faith. India as a whole does not wear saffron colors.

Haque says that Muslims have ruled India since the 11th century. He needs to reread his history book. The entire area between Peshawar and Rangoon (that is Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and Burma) was dotted with kingdoms of various sizes whose boundaries fluctuated frequently. A few of the principalities were first invaded and then ruled by Muslims. The Moghuls during their regime co-opted Hinduism and expanded their reach. There have been cruel tyrants among Muslim rulers who plundered and demolished Hindu temples and taxed them heavily because of their religion. The history of India is the story of invasion from the West — from Mahmud to Alexander the Great — and the resistance by local people and their rulers set against each other. It was the British who brought all of them under one umbrella and made the subcontinent a geographic unit.

Haque says “Extremism has ... permeated all groups of people.” I agree. However, it does not help if educated people like him refrain from being objective.

Anadi Naik


(4) comments


A reasonable topic for discussion. Let many flowers bloom.


It has often seemed to me that Mr. Haque makes overly broad assertions when he delves into history. He would have been an excellent narrator for newsreels from the 1930s and 1940s.


You guys need to take this outside.


There will be a test later

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.