As a teacher and a mother of two students who graduated from FCPS schools, I know how important public schools are for the future of Frederick County. In 2002, Maryland adopted a funding formula based on the needs of students at that time. Now, almost 18 years later, those needs have changed drastically. Special Education and English Language Learner needs have increased, the number of students living in poverty has almost doubled (from 22 percent to 45 percent), and the need for training in technology and career skills, including trades like plumbing, welding, and building, has increased.

The Blueprint for Maryland’s Future, among other things, would broadly expand career technical education to give our students job-ready industry certifications upon graduation. If they choose to, they could get well-paying, stable jobs right out of high school. We need to attract and keep good jobs here in Frederick County, and building a steady pipeline of well-trained future workers will go a long way to building a strong, prosperous economy over the long-term.

A new formula for funding schools, and full implementation of the recommendations of the Kirwan Commission, can address these needs by expanding access to pre-K and career and technical education, hiring more educators, and providing additional support to struggling learners.

I have had as many as 42 students in my classroom. As hard as I work, I cannot fully meet the individual needs of that many students at once. We need more teachers and instructional assistants in our schools. We need more technical and career training opportunities. The current funding that our schools have isn’t enough to give every student a real shot at success.

Investment in public education is an investment in the future of Frederick County. I want the next generation to be able to meet or exceed the quality of life of the last. It is time to contact your legislators and urge them to pass the Blueprint for Maryland’s Future during the 2020 legislative session.

Jennifer Reynolds


(2) comments


Ms. Reynolds - as a teacher I can understand why you might support something like the Kirwan Commission to be enacted. However, it is a severely flawed proposal lacking the basics of any semi-serious proposal. With no model for funding or sustainability, it more resembles a five year-old's letter to Santa Claus than a serious attempt to address educational issues.


Would you give up your income tax credits/deductions you get for having children to fund the cost so that you pay the same to educate your children as those of us who have no children pay? Would you be willing to pay a user fee just like drivers do when they pay registration fees, gas taxes, etc.? Having children is a chooice and it's time parents pay a greater share (ot at least the same share) to educate their children as those of us who have chosen not to have children and thus not further contribute to the problems humans are causing to the planet and other species.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominem criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.