In recent months, as a reaction to a variety of crime and public order problems in downtown Frederick, there has been a lot of talk about community policing. We often hear the term community policing bandied about, particularly when hiring a police chief, voting for a mayor or when a crime or public order problem crops up. But what is community policing? Do those advocating or promoting community policing as the answer to a problem actually know what it is? In most cases, the answer is no.

The U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) defines community policing as “a philosophy that promotes organizational strategies that support the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques to proactively address the immediate conditions that give rise to public safety issues such as crime, social disorder, and fear of crime.” In short, it is the police and the public working together to solve problems.

I spent 17 years at the COPS office, most of which was overseeing training and technical assistance programs and projects nationwide, which were designed to assist state and local law enforcement in their efforts to put community policing into operation. In that time, I saw many attempts to implement community policing, by both small and large police departments and the communities they serve. Some did well; many did not. Many talked the talk but failed to walk the walk, so to speak.

Community policing is not a few foot patrols, bike patrols or officers riding around on a Segway. Community policing is not attending a few monthly meetings to share some crime statistics and hear some citizen complaints. It is not organizing a neighborhood watch program. Although these tactics might be used, alone or in conjunction, they are not community policing — not without a partnership with public stakeholders to solve problems. They are simply tools in the toolbox that may be used in problem-solving.

At the heart of community policing is "the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques.” It is a philosophy held by police departments that recognize the need for public input and assistance in addressing crime and pubic order problems. Sir Robert Peel, who founded the London Metropolitan Police in 1829, observed this in his principles of policing. Peel said, “To maintain at all times a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and that the public are the police, the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.”

To solve crime and public order problems, it takes more than public calls for community policing. It takes active participation on the part of the public, partnering with police to identify the root cause of problems and working together to solve them. As Peel stated, it takes “... attention to duties which are incumbent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.”

You can’t call for community policing and simply walk away leaving it to the police. Community policing does not work that way.

Karl Bickel, formerly second in command of the Frederick County Sheriff’s Office and former assistant professor of criminal justice, is retired from the U.S. Department of Justice and writes from Monrovia. He can be reached at KarlBickel@comcast.net.

(8) comments

Captain Yossarian

Community Policing works very well when poverty is not criminalized by making various activities that poor people tend to do very illegal.

Comment deleted.
DickD

No, Bunny, as I told you before, I believe Karl has other plans, but he is very capable of speaking for himself.

Comment deleted.
marinick1

[thumbup]

mrnatural1

I don't know that anyone here in this comment section intends to be critical of witnesses who are afraid to testify, but generally speaking there is a lot of "blame the witness" sentiment out there.

It must be extremely frustrating for detectives trying to solve assaults and murders when they know there are witnesses yet no one will come forward. That aggravation is completely understandable.

At the same time, witnesses are well aware that the police cannot always protect them. Most witnesses are not given the opportunity to go into WITSEC. There is often a high likelihood that they -- or someone they care about -- will be killed if they testify (or plan to testify). It's hard to imagine living that way -- expecting to be shot at any time, or to have your kid brother or sister (etc) killed.

It's no wonder so many won't cooperate.

Another issue is that drug dealing, prostitution, and related crimes, including murder, are symptoms of underlying societal problems. As long as those problems remain, the crime will never go away.

gdunn

Community policing is a 2 way street. Police/public partnership. Yet the public will not do its part to complete the partnership. Witnesses refuse to cooperate or provide their information making cases unprosecutable.

KarlBickel

You are absolutely right gdunn. When a crime is committed the police can and will work hard to solve it. But without witness cooperation leading to identification and prosecution of the suspect, the officer’s efforts are fruitless and frustrating.

gabrielshorn2013

Good point gdunn. The problem with the high murder rate in Baltimore is a prime example. The States Attorney, Marilyn Mosby, drops 38% of her cases due to lack of testimony from witnesses. She also has the lowest conviction rate of any prosecutor in recent history. Witness intimidation is out of control, and there is little, if any protection available to those witnesses. Thugs with multiple murders under their belt are on the streets to keep killing. The Baltimore Mayor and the Governor have stated this many times. Until witnesses are willing and able to come forward, Baltimore will continue to be the east coast murder capital.

https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/crime/bs-md-ci-mosby-conviction-rates-20180410-story.html

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominem criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.