SAN DIEGO (AP) — The Biden administration has quietly tasked six humanitarian groups with recommending which migrants should be allowed into the United States to pursue asylum as it faces mounting pressure to lift public health rules that have barred people from seeking protection.

The consortium of groups is determining who is most vulnerable out of those waiting in Mexico to get into the U.S., and the criteria they are using has not been made public. It comes as large numbers of migrants are crossing the southern border and the government has been rapidly expelling them from the country under a public health order instituted by former President Donald Trump and kept in place by President Joe Biden during the coronavirus pandemic.

Several members of the consortium revealed details about the new system to The Associated Press. The government is aiming to admit up to 250 asylum-seekers a day who are referred by the groups, agreeing to that system only until July 31. By then, the consortium hopes the Biden administration will have lifted the public health rules, though the government has not committed to that.

So far, nearly 800 asylum-seekers have been let into the country since May 3, and members of the consortium say there is already more demand than they can meet.

The groups have not been publicly identified except for the International Rescue Committee, a global relief organization. The others are London-based Save the Children; two U.S.-based organizations, HIAS and Kids in Need of Defense; and two Mexico-based organizations, Asylum Access and the Institute for Women in Migration, according to two people with direct knowledge who spoke on condition of anonymity because the information was not intended for public release.

Asylum Access, which provides services to people seeing asylum in Mexico, characterized its role as minimal.

The effort started at the border in El Paso, Texas, and is expanding to Nogales, Arizona.

A similar but separate system led by the American Civil Liberties Union began in late March and allows 35 families a day into the United States at places along the border. It has no end date.

The twin tracks are described by participating organizations as an imperfect transition from so-called Title 42 authority, named for a section of an obscure 1944 public health law that Trump used in March 2020 to effectively end asylum at the Mexican border. With COVID-19 vaccination rates rising, Biden is finding it difficult to justify the expulsions on public health grounds and faces demands to end it from the U.N. refugee agency and members of his own party and administration.

The Department of Homeland Security said in a statement that it's in “close coordination with international and non-governmental organizations in Mexico" to identify vulnerable people and that it has the final say on who gets in. The agency described its work with the groups as fluid and said it hasn't identified them to avoid giving them exposure.

Some consortium members are concerned that their offices in Mexico could be mobbed by asylum-seekers, overwhelming their tiny staffs and exposing them to potential threats and physical attacks from extortionists and other criminals.

Critics of the new selection processes say too much power is vested in a small number of organizations and that the efforts are secretive without a clear explanation of how the groups were chosen. Critics also say there are no assurances that the most vulnerable or deserving migrants will be chosen to seek asylum.

The consortium was formed after the U.S. government asked the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees’ office in Mexico for the names of organizations with deep experience and capacity in Mexico, said Sibylla Brodzinsky, a U.N. office spokeswoman.

“We’ve had long relationships with them and they’re trusted partners,” she said.

The groups say they are merely streamlining the process but that the vulnerable migrants' cases can come from anywhere.

In Nogales, Arizona, the International Rescue Committee is working with local organizations and using a program that connects to migrants via social media and smartphones to find those “facing extreme life-threatening situations," said Raymundo Tamayo, the group’s director in Mexico. It plans to refer up to 600 people a month to U.S. officials.

Special consideration is being given to asylum-seekers who have been in Mexico a long time, are in need of acute medical attention or who have disabilities, are members of the LGBTQ community or are non-Spanish speakers, though each case is being weighed on its unique circumstances, Tamayo said.

ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt said advocacy groups are in “a very difficult position because they need to essentially rank the desperation” of people, but he insisted it was temporary. The government, he said, “cannot farm out the asylum system.”

The most vulnerable migrants may be too scared or uninformed to bring attention to themselves, said Margaret Cargioli, managing attorney for Immigrant Defenders Law Center, a Los Angeles-based group that got involved with the ACLU-led effort after “more organizations became aware of it.” She called the approach a “Band-Aid” while the health rules remain in place.

Migration experts not involved in the process have questioned why the government has not been more transparent.

“It has been murky,” said Jessica Bolter, an analyst at the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute who believes the administration is quietly trying to be humane without encouraging more people to come, a balancing act she doubts will succeed.

“Setting out clear and accurate information about how and who might get in might lead to fewer migrants making the trip, so there’s not this game of chance that kind of seems to be in place right now,” Bolter said.

U.S. border authorities recorded the highest number of encounters with migrants in more than 20 years in April, though many were repeat crossers who had previously been expelled from the country. The number of children crossing the border alone also is hovering at all-time highs.

Against that backdrop, some advocates are seeing the makings of the “humane” asylum system that Biden promised during his campaign. Details have been elusive, with administration officials saying they need time.

Susana Coreas, who fled El Salvador, was among those identified as vulnerable and allowed into the United States last month. Coreas spent more than a year in Ciudad Juarez waiting to apply for asylum but was barred by the public health order.

She and other transgender women refurbished an abandoned hotel to have a safe place to stay after they felt uncomfortable at a number of shelters in the rough Mexican city and got help from the International Rescue Committee.

But they continued to have problems. One transgender woman had a knife pointed at her. Another had a gun pulled on her.

“There was so much anxiety,” Coreas said. “I now feel at peace.”

(8) comments


can't fix stupid and lapdog has plenty of it along with his obama gang


There are refugees seeking asylum all over the world. The US is one of many countries being sought. This article is regarding asylum seekers seeking admission through Mexico. The goal is aiming to admit up to 250 asylum-seekers a day who are referred by these groups, that’s 89,000 refugees.

These are the top 10 countries receiving the most refugees;

1. Lebanon – 21.8 per cent of the total population. Lebanon, with a population of 6 million, is currently hosting an estimated 1.5 million refugees from Syria. ...

2. Jordan – 10.7 %..

3. Turkey – 5.1 %...

4. Liberia – 4.6 %...

5. Uganda – 3.8 %...

6. Nauru – 3.2 %...

7. Malta – 2.7 %...

8. Djibouti – 2.7 % ...

9. Sweden - 2.7 % ...

10. Sudan - 2.5 % ...

In addition to these ten countries that have received the most refugees relative to their population, here are the top numbers in physical head count;

* Germany – 1,191,000 refugees (1.5% of the total population)

* Ethiopia – 962,000 (0.9%)

* United States – 838,000 (0.25%)

* Bangladesh – 675,000 (0.4%)

* Kenya – 470,000 (0.9%)

* Russia – 449,000 (0.3%)


Over the past decade, persons granted asylum in the US, (meaning legally allowed to remain in the country without fear of deportation), three countries represented more than half of all Refugees given asylum in the US. They came from Myanmar, the largest group, at 21%, Iraqis, next at 18%, followed by Bhutanese refugees at 13%.

Latin American and Caribbean Refugee admissions through resettlement programs from Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) have been consistently low despite high need for humanitarian protections. But changing migration policies under the new administration and sociopolitical contexts may allow more refugees from this region in future years.


They get in and "disappear" without needing asylum. Funny but there are quite a few Africans that could probably use asylum but seem to be ignored. Bill Clinton decided to effectively ignore the genocide in Rwanda where most of the roughly 800,000 killed were Tutsi. According to UNHCR (see: "Sub-Saharan Africa hosts more than 26 per cent of the world’s refugee population." (over 18 million). If asylum were based on need, I suspect very few from Central America of Mexico would be near the top of the list in terms of help or protection needed.


Are there certain days where the U.S. will admit none? 250 x 365 = 91,250 a year (or 91,500 in a leap year). But, that 250/day is just from crossing the Mexican/U.S. border most of whom will be Mexicans, Central Americans or South Americans. If asylum is the immediate goal of these people from Central and South America why to they travel so far to seek it versus asking for it in any of the other countries they pass through? After all, there is violence, drug gangs right wing terrorists, wife beaters, etc. in this country too.


Md1756, there are 10 days every year where the federal government is completely shut down with the exception of essential personnel. If you subtract that from 365 days plus a leap year day, what does that come out to? 🤷‍♂️

Way, ways far less southern border crossing get asylum than those that seek it. Just in April of this year, 178,000 Latino immigrants sought asylum at the southern border. If half were granted asylum how many would that add up to in a year? That would exceed the annual number in a month. Refugees know that but they come anyway. They are desperate. It’s like a lottery for their lives. But we can’t take them all.

The voted of out administration chose to unsuccessfully build a wall and said “FU”. The current administration is taking a different approach. The VP Harris has been assigned to lead learn and address root causes and to attack them. Looking at why people are leaving (like organized crime, corruption, poverty) and help them stay in their own countries. It may even call for military intervention. No, not standing at the border with a stop sign like the last administration but addressing long term root causes. Look for something big coming out in the next few months. A joint policing and economic effort. It might even include Cuba.🤷‍♂️

I agree with you though, more attention should be paid to African nations. During the Trump 4 years in office the number of Africans grand asylum dropped from 40,000 to 16,000 for the entire continent. Meanwhile his in-laws during that same period were granted asylum and citizenship in 2 years. Was there a crisis in Slovenia?

Your fears over crime should be given serious consideration, especially how may guns are easily accessible in the United States. We shoot 25 times more people hear then any western civilization. That’s insane. But the FBI says that undocumented residents account for less crimes then American born, and those granted asylum even way less. We should seek to get down to their numbers.🧐


How about asking the American public instead. Do those humanitarian groups pay any taxes? Why the racist/culturalist policy of only reviewing the cases in Mexico when there are plenty of people in the world who are worse off but have no means to make it to the U.S. border or even a U.S. Embassy or Consulate? Why the secrecy from the Administration as to who are the consortium of groups helping to make the determination of who is worthy for asylum? Why does this include outside organizations making recommendations? There is corruption everywhere in Mexico, how do we know that there isn't corruption in these groups? Why aren't we making more efforts to help those Millions in Africa and Asia who are being killed, displaced, etc. by their governments and fighting?


Secrecy in this administration, MD? That can't be:

“In a democracy, the public deserves as much transparency as possible regarding the work of our national security institutions, consistent with legitimate needs to protect sources and methods and sensitive foreign relationships,” according to a memorandum issued by President Biden on February 4.

“The revitalization of our national security and foreign policy workforce requires a recommitment to the highest standards of transparency,” the President wrote.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Already a member?

Login Now
Click Here!

Currently a News-Post subscriber?

Activate your membership at no additional charge.
Click Here!

Need more information?

Learn about the benefits of membership.
Click Here!

Ready to join?

Choose the membership plan that fits your needs.
Click Here!