Maryland lawmakers override vetoes on sweeping police reform

FILE - In this Thursday, Feb. 18, 2021, file photo, a Baltimore police cruiser is seen parked near a building while officers check on a call. A comprehensive package of police reform measures cleared the Maryland General Assembly on Wednesday, April 7, 2021 including repeal of police job protections long cited as a barricade to accountability. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez, File)

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — A comprehensive package of police reform measures cleared the Maryland General Assembly on Wednesday, including repeal of police job protections long cited as a barricade to accountability.

Lawmakers approved a new statewide use-of-force policy, limits on no-knock warrants and an expansion of public access to records in police disciplinary cases.

Police would be required to use body cameras statewide by 2026. One measure would create a unit in the attorney general’s office to investigate police-involved deaths and prohibit law enforcement from buying surplus military equipment.

The legislation, which now goes to Republican Gov. Larry Hogan, has been months in the making and a top priority of the General Assembly, which is controlled by Democrats. A spokesman for Hogan said he would review the legislation.

Lawmakers voted to repeal the Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights, which critics have decried for standing as a barrier to officer discipline. Maryland was the first state to enact such a law in 1974, and about 20 states have adopted similar laws setting due process procedure for investigating police misconduct.

Lawmakers have been working for months on the reforms after George Floyd’s death in police custody in May, which prompted nationwide protests. Supporters emphasized that while police brutality has received intense nationwide focus recently, the problem has long been with the country.

“We cannot continue to do things the same way and expect different outcomes,” said Sen. Melony Griffith, a Prince George’s County Democrat. “We had to respond to this crisis with change.”

Maryland has struggled with police accountability problems in recent years. Baltimore’s police department entered into a federal consent decree after the 2015 death of Freddie Gray following an injury while in police custody, which caused unrest in the city. Lawmakers approved some police reforms the following year, but critics have said they were not enough.

One of the bills approved Wednesday to expand public access to police personnel disciplinary records now shielded under the state’s public information act is named after Anton Black, a 19-year-old who died in police custody in 2018 in a rural town on Maryland’s Eastern Shore.

Senators who voted against the measures, many of whom had supported legislation earlier in the session for some of the reforms, said changes made in the House of Delegates and hastily agreed to by the Senate went too far. They also said the changes will erode law enforcement by hurting recruitment and retention of police.

“We will be back here again examining this problem and working with it,” said Sen. Jack Bailey, a Republican and retired police officer who represents St. Mary’s and Calvert counties. “We should not be passing a bill just to pass a bill.”

Under the statewide use-of-force provision, an officer would not be able to use force unless it is “necessary and proportional” to “prevent an imminent threat of physical injury to a person” or “effectuate a legitimate law enforcement objective.”

A police officer convicted of causing serious injury or death through excessive force would face 10 years in prison, under the legislation.

Opponents were especially critical of that provision, as well as the use-of-force provision, which they said was poorly crafted.

“We’re defending standards that are not defined in Maryland law, and so when you take a cop and make him a criminal based on undefined standards like this, to think it’s not going to affect policing is ludicrous,” said Sen. Michael Hough, a Republican who represents parts of Frederick and Carroll counties.

Sen. Jill Carter, a Baltimore Democrat who has long advocated for police reform, said Baltimore, while under the federal consent decree, has adopted a policy for objective reasonableness, necessity and proportionality when it comes to use of force.

“I support the police, and I want the police to be better, and this is going to make the police better, and what that’s going to do for Maryland, it’s going to make Maryland better, because only when we restore trust and integrity are we going to then be able to have a safer state,” Carter said.

A provision also creates a duty-to-intervene that requires an officer to make a reasonable effort to prevent use of excessive force.

Legislation also would restrict when no-knock warrants could be used. Under the bill, police could only use no-knock warrants between 8 a.m. and 7 p.m., except in an emergency.

Another measure sent to the governor would enable Baltimore voters to decide whether the state’s largest city should take full control of the police department from the state.

Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

(6) comments

mattlemp

Don't worry, bootlickers, the judges, prosecutors, and cops will continue to abuse citizen's rights even with this milquetoast legislation.

gabrielshorn2013

Hmmm...sounds like somebody that has had a run-in or two with law enforcement. I wonder why...

gjthuro

another loser from the left; crime is out of control in many cities, convicted felons are being released early on orders from Joe and his gang, police are being defunded so yeah lets make their jobs more difficult...how utterly stupid; and the taxpayers are paying for this NON-Service from these pols. who don't give a hang about us and they are dying to take away our gun RIGHTS to boot.

public-redux

The use of ellipses instead of periods and a new sentence is another commonality between gjthuro and jerseygrl in addition to the ones I mentioned elsewhere.

public-redux

“... convicted felons are being released early on orders from Joe and his gang...”

Presumably you are referring to people convicted of federal crimes and not people convicted of state crimes. This article is about Maryland.

olefool

This law is preposterous. If it repeals a law enforcement officer's Qualified Immunity protections, it should likewise repeal all qualified immunity of Prosecutors, Judges, and all other government employees so covered or exposed now. Prosecutors and Judges do more harm to black and brown people than all law enforcement combined, they should face their accusers too.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Already a member?

Login Now
Click Here!

Currently a News-Post subscriber?

Activate your membership at no additional charge.
Click Here!

Need more information?

Learn about the benefits of membership.
Click Here!

Ready to join?

Choose the membership plan that fits your needs.
Click Here!