Virus Outbreak Texas

Healthcare professional Kenzie Anderson takes a sample from a patient Friday at a United Memorial Medical Center COVID-19 testing site in Houston. The number of COVID-19 cases continues to rise across the state.

WASHINGTON — The decade-old health care law that has divided Americans even as it expanded coverage and protected people with preexisting conditions is being put to yet another test. Amid a pandemic, President Donald Trump and some red states want the Supreme Court to declare the Affordable Care Act unconstitutional. Blue states and the U.S. House say the case has no merit.

Here are questions and answers as the case unfolds:


In the real world, very little will change right away. Politically, it’s another story.

It’s unclear if the court will hear oral arguments before the November election. A decision isn’t likely until next year, which means the ACA stays in place for the foreseeable future.

Even if a Supreme Court majority comes down of the side of “Obamacare’s” opponents, unwinding the 10-year-old law would be time-consuming and fraught with political risk. Many of the ACA’s provisions are popular, such as guaranteed coverage for people with preexisting medical conditions, and birth control coverage for women free of charge. Others are wired into the health care system, like changes to Medicare payments and enhanced legal authority against fraud.

In the political realm, Trump’s unrelenting opposition to the ACA energizes Democrats going into the November elections.

As if on cue, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has rolled out a bill to expand the health law, and the House is expected to vote on it Monday.

The goal isn’t so much to pass legislation, since Pelosi’s bill won’t get a look in the Republican-controlled Senate. But it may make some Republicans squirm by forcing them to cast a vote their Democratic opponents can use in campaign ads this fall.

“God willing the courts will do the right thing, but we just don’t know,” says Pelosi. “So we are getting prepared for what comes next.”


Remarkably well, despite dramatic pronouncements by politicians on both sides.

Larry Levitt of the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that about 23 million people are covered under the law, about the same as when former President Barack Obama left office.

That includes about 12.5 million covered under Medicaid expansions in most states and some 10 million through health insurance marketplaces like that offer individual plans subsidized by the taxpayers.

According to Gallup, Americans under Trump have either tilted in favor of the ACA or been closely split. By contrast, during Obama’s last term, the public more often tilted against the law. Fifty-two percent approved of the ACA in March, while 47% disapproved.

A turning point came when Trump and a GOP Congress failed to repeal Obamacare in 2017.


It has taken on a new role. Coverage through the ACA can be a lifeline for people who lost their health insurance as a result of layoffs.

The Kaiser Family Foundation estimated recently that nearly 27 million people lost employer coverage because of pandemic-related layoffs, and nearly 80% would be eligible for Medicaid or an Obamacare plan with subsidized premiums.

New government numbers show enrollment has grown by about half a million people amid the pandemic.


That’s a source of anxiety for many Americans.

A Kaiser foundation poll in January found that 57% are worried that they or someone in their family will lose health insurance if the Supreme Court overturns the ACA’s protections for people with preexisting conditions. Under Obamacare, insurers cannot use someone’s medical history to turn them away or charge them more.

The Trump administration has argued in court that the law’s constitutional flaws would also entangle its protections for people with preexisting conditions.

Yet Trump has promised he would preserve those safeguards, without laying out a plan for how he would do that.

Some prominent Republicans say they never intended to undermine protections for people with preexisting conditions when they voted to repeal Obamacare’s unpopular fines on people going uninsured. That repeal is the root cause of the current court case, since the law’s opponents argue that without the fines the entire statute is rendered unconstitutional.

Traditionally, Republicans have supported protections for people with preexisting conditions, but with a limitation that individuals have to keep up their coverage to qualify.


He’s backing his former boss’ signature legislation.

The Democratic presidential candidate says if elected president he would build on the ACA to move the nation closer to coverage for all. Biden would increase the health law’s subsidies for individual private plans, finish its Medicaid expansion, and create a new “public option” alternative modeled on Medicare.


Under Trump, the uninsured rate had started inching up again. The economic shutdown to try to slow the spread of coronavirus is likely to have made things much worse, but government numbers aren’t available to quantify the impact.

The Census Bureau reported last year that 27.5 million people, 8.5% of the population, lacked health insurance coverage in 2018. That was an increase of 1.9 million uninsured, or 0.5 percentage point, from 2017.

It’s not clear how many people who lost employer coverage in the pandemic have wound up uninsured.

(8) comments


Your headline on page A6 that "Dems push to overturn Obamacare'' is despicable. I am furious with you. Are you trying to scare people into voting for Trump?


I usually read the "epages" version and for this article I saw "Q&A: Democrats push to overturn ‘Obamacare’ during a pandemic." And this version does not mention Democrats. Good. It is the Republicans want to get rid of the ACA, So why have a different headline?


Print version also reads "Democrats push to overturn 'Obamacare'...". Wow. How in the world did that mistake happen?

Boyce Rensberger

There is one simple answer: The lack of editors. This is a problem throughout the paper. I used to be a newspaper editor, and the mistakes pop out at me every time.


Boyce, I'm wondering how the headline could've been inadvertently changed, given that it was an AP story. Everywhere else I'm seeing the story online, it has the correct AP headline. Genuinely curious about the process of incorporating AP stories into a paper, and you seem like you'd know.

Boyce Rensberger

Fernijenb: The usual practice is that AP supplies a headline, but every client newspaper is free to put on any headline they want. Normally this is to fit the space allotted on the page layout. Different papers are going to have different layouts, and the wire service can't anticipate them all. (Same reason explains why reporters don't write the headlines on their stories.)

I'm pretty sure the editor who wrote that hed (as it's spelled in the trade) didn't deliberately switch the party named. The FNP, like every other newspaper, has cut way back on the number of editors, which means the ones left on the job are overworked and must do rush jobs. The result is embarrassing.


I sure hope it was not an intentional "mistake".

Boyce Rensberger

Sloppy editing, plain and simple.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Already a member?

Login Now
Click Here!

Currently a News-Post subscriber?

Activate your membership at no additional charge.
Click Here!

Need more information?

Learn about the benefits of membership.
Click Here!

Ready to join?

Choose the membership plan that fits your needs.
Click Here!