WASHINGTON (AP) — House Republicans want Congress to address the troubled finances of Social Security’s disability program, setting the stage for a contentious debate that could affect 11 million people in the middle of the next presidential campaign.

The House has adopted a procedural rule that could force lawmakers to tackle the issue by the end of 2016, when the program is projected to run out of reserves, triggering automatic benefit cuts.

An easy fix was available. Congress could have redirected payroll tax revenue from Social Security’s much larger retirement program, as lawmakers have done before.

But Tuesday’s procedural rule blocks such a move, unless as part of a larger plan to improve Social Security’s finances, by either cutting benefits or raising taxes. The rule only applies to the House.

Tinkering with Social Security never has been easy, and factoring in election-year politics makes finding votes even harder for those alternatives.

Rep. Tom Reed, R-N.Y., said he sponsored the provision to prevent Congress from “raiding” the retirement fund to prop up the disability program.

Reed said lawmakers are working on proposals to bolster the disability program’s finances, but that taking tax money from the retirement program is “a short-term Band-Aid.”

“We need to do better than that,” Reed said.

Added the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis.: “We just want to make sure we improve the integrity of the Social Security trust fund all across the board.”

Advocates for older Americans say the rule could be used to help push through benefit cuts, especially because House Republicans have opposed raising taxes.

“This is a blatant attempt on the first day members take office to sneak a rule into the process that virtually guarantees devastating cuts for beneficiaries of the Social Security disability system,” said J. David Cox, president of the American Federation of Government Employees.

David Certner, of AARP, said it would be a mistake to eliminate the option of redirecting money from the retirement fund.

“Otherwise, we could be facing a deadline, and certainly over the last couple of years, we’ve seen Congress seemingly unable to pass bills, even with deadlines in front of them,” Certner said.

New House rules will govern the chamber for the next two years. The 36-page set of rules passed by a vote of 234-172, with all Democrats opposed and almost every Republican in favor.

On page 32 is a provision that allows any representative to raise a point of order if the House tries to pass a bill redirecting tax revenue from Social Security’s retirement fund to the disability fund. The House could vote to overcome the objection, but that could be difficult, with almost every Republican supporting the rules package.

The number of workers, spouses and children receiving Social Security disability benefits has ballooned over the past decade. Members of Congress from both political parties say fraud has played a part, too.

About 11 million people get disability benefits, nearly 40 percent more than a decade ago. By comparison, about 48 million people get Social Security retirement or survivor benefits.

Unless Congress acts, the trust fund that supports the disability program will run dry sometime during the last three months of 2016, according to projections by the trustees who oversee Social Security. At that point, the program will collect only enough payroll taxes to pay 81 percent of benefits.

That would trigger an automatic 19 percent cut in benefit payments. The average monthly payment for a disabled worker is $1,146, or a little less than $14,000 a year.

Social Security is supported by a 12.4 percent tax on wages up to $118,500. Half is paid by workers and half by employers.

Most of the payroll tax — 10.6 percent of wages — goes to the retirement fund. The remaining 1.8 percent of wages goes to the disability fund.

Social Security’s retirement trust fund is projected to run dry in 2034. At that point, it would only collect enough payroll taxes to pay about 75 percent of benefits.

Social Security has more than $2.7 trillion in reserves, but the retirement program has been paying out more in benefits than it collects in payroll taxes since 2010.

The disability program has been paying out more than it collects since 2005.

If the retirement fund and the disability fund were combined, they would have enough money to pay full benefits until 2033.

 

(14) comments

DickD

The Repugants will do what the can to eliminate Social Security, like Bush trying to make it an investment on the stock market. They will never be happy until they repeal it, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, and Obama Care. There will be a lot of reasons to vote Democrat in 2016.

DickD

Both can be sustainable until 2033 with the current money by combining them. So, what do the Republicans want to do, they want to cut benefits of the disabilty portion, while offering a chance for the Democrats to commit suicide by opening up the entire Social Secuity issue. That isn't going to happen and the Republicans know it.

As Dave Cox said; “This is a blatant attempt on the first day members take office to sneak a rule into the process that virtually guarantees devastating cuts for beneficiaries of the Social Security disability system,” said J. David Cox, president of the American Federation of Government Employees.

jerseygrl42

someone needs to debate and solve these issues and we surely cannot expect the socialist Dems to do what must be done to keep these programs solvent for the truly needy and weed out the phonies of which there are MANY

MAVRICKinc7

No more excuses. The Republicans have both houses. Now it's time to see how they manage the Nations business, starting out with ways and means on how to cut Social Security, take credit for Obama's sucesses with jobs and the budget from the hole they dug for us in 2008 with two unfunded wars, unregulated Wall Street corruption and a recession that keeps on taking and giving nothing back to US.

DickD

I think the Democrats are more than willing to discuss increasing the tax and/or increasing the cap from $118,000. Of course they are not going to destroy Social Security, which is the Republian goal.

FrederickVeteran

Taking money from disable families to provide tax relief for the wealthy Americas will trickle down prosperity to disabled workers unable to work. WTH did I just say?

DickD

Seems like an easy fix to combine the two programs. They would still be good until 2033 and how any baby boomers will still be around then. A baby boomer still alive would be around 88 years old.

MAVRICKinc7

AND, of no real consequence or concern for those who will eventually take their shoes and carry on with fewer benefits from our Social Security programs? Shovel in and shovel out?

dcg326

GOssip again,just take the billions given to foreign countries for US AMERICANS, easy way.US first for a change.DONE quick too , today.

tish3101

The simple solution to this problem is to eliminate the $118,500 cap. No one seems interested in discussing that option.

vicdavy

The Democrats have been talking about this for years but they know the Repukes won't go for it. Their master Grover Norquist won't allow it.

vicdavy

The Party of Greed is at it again! Simple solution, raise the Social Security tax ceiling,problem solved! Civilized folks shake their heads at America's Oligarchy.

FrederickVeteran

I support the GOP cutting Social Secuirty, federal retirement and veterans disability 20% to give the 1% more tax relief.

DickD

I definitely do not![sad]

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, insights and experiences, not personal attacks. Ad hominen criticisms are not allowed. Focus on ideas instead.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
No trolls. Off-topic comments and comments that bait others are not allowed.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
Say it once. No repeat or repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.