I have a problem with it.
Dick if this was such a “mole hill” then why was there a month long political pressure campaign to make sure the word was included? My answer to the question is in the article. It’s because words and concepts matter in this document, and as the only “crisis”, it will drive priorities and …
No worries mrnatural. I’ve been posting on here for years and I read the comments. Granted, I don’t post as much as I used to but that’s because of my work situation, not my Council duties. I’ve seen many of your posts and I appreciate your work.
Seriously Dick? Actually, I never "saw a crisis in Monrovia", in fact, I doubt I ever used the word at all. I reserve it for situations involving more imminent danger and potential for loss of life. That just happens to be my mindset.
No Burgess, we're not creating a "fake crisis" - we're having a discussion, and we're doing it with civility. You ought to try it sometimes.
I hope you realize that arguing that the word will not change the meaning of the document is equally applicable for excluding it, as it is for including it.
Thank you for this service
Dick - those will be available in our agenda for next weeks meeting, which will be posted today