After years of contentious debate, Maryland last year did away with its death penalty. The legislation, however, did not apply to the four individuals who were already awaiting execution on the state’s death row.

That exception to the new law has created a controversy that needn’t have occurred, but can be easily put to rest by Gov. Martin O’Malley — if he has the political will to do so.

To begin with, when Maryland finally decided it was against executing people, the new law should not have left four prisoners on death row. The General Assembly should have resolved the matter completely and made the law applicable to everyone. Failure to do that has created the current controversy.

A recent Washington Post story reported that Attorney General Douglas Gansler says the state does not have the legal authority to execute the men because it no longer has regulations in place detailing how to administer lethal injections. And with no death penalty on the books, the state can’t develop new regulations on carrying out executions. That reasoning sounds a bit Catch-22-like to us, but it nevertheless leaves the four condemned men in limbo, which Gansler says violates their right to due process.

Wicomico County State’s Attorney Matthew Maciarello takes issue with the state’s position, and says legislation could be introduced that would explicitly allow the executions of the men still on death row. That seems possible to us, considering the law banning executions did not apply to the four in the first place. However, it also seems possible to us that the General Assembly could pass new legislation that would make the no-execution law applicable to everyone.

The far easiest path to resolving this quandary is for O’Malley to simply commute the sentences of all four to life without parole. We think that would be the right thing to do. With the new law, Maryland decided that it was politically and morally against capital punishment. To execute anyone after that law became effective doesn’t make any sense at all.

O’Malley may be waiting for another solution to this matter. One of the condemned men has appealed to the state, which in turn is asking for an appellate court to resentence him. If that happens, it would set a precedent for the other three men.

Another of the four, however, has petitioned O’Malley himself to commute his sentence. So far, the governor hasn’t acted on the appeal, and The Post reported that his office last Thursday “declined to comment ... on the governor’s deliberations.”

O’Malley can put to rest this current conundrum by commuting the sentences of all four men, which would also put the quietus, once and for all, on Maryland’s long, divisive struggle with the death penalty.

That’s exactly what he should do.

(10) comments


Interesting front page story about alleged gerrymandering in Alabama, sounds exactly like what omalley and brown perpetrated on the citizens of Frederick County...good riddance to them both


No wonder crime is high these days, and that is because the death penalty is not used???


You have posited a cause-and-effect relationship between the death penalty and crime. Are you willing to stick to your guns (hah!) on that relationship?

If you look up the data for crime, you will find that crime is not high these days compared to previous days.

Which raises the question, is that because the death penalty is not used?


Crime is NOT high these days. Very low.

Wikipedia writes "Crime in the United States has been present since colonization. Crime rates have varied over time, with a sharp rise after World War II, before peaking between the 1970s and early 1990s. Since the early 1990s, crime has declined in the United States, and current crime rates are approximately the same as those of the 1960s."


elymus43, Get an education, the deterrence of the Death Penalty has been debunked decades ago!


OMalley has been a systemic failure in all endeavors he shouldn't do a thing until Hogan takes over.


Do you also feel the same about the BY gang?


Executing these four people for their crimes cannot possibly deter someone else from committing a similar crime for fear that they too could be executed. So the "deterrent effect" argument for capital punishment is null and void at this point.


Commute these four sentences to life without parole and be done with it.


Commute the sentences! The Death Penalty should be banned in the United States!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. No vulgar, racist, sexist or sexually-oriented language.
Engage ideas. This forum is for the exchange of ideas, not personal attacks or ad hominem criticisms.
Be civil. Don't threaten. Don't lie. Don't bait. Don't degrade others.
No trolling. Stay on topic.
No spamming. This is not the place to sell miracle cures.
No deceptive names. Apparently misleading usernames are not allowed.
Say it once. No repetitive posts, please.
Help us. Use the 'Report' link for abusive posts.

Thank you for reading!

Already a member?

Login Now
Click Here!

Currently a News-Post subscriber?

Activate your membership at no additional charge.
Click Here!

Need more information?

Learn about the benefits of membership.
Click Here!

Ready to join?

Choose the membership plan that fits your needs.
Click Here!